<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Gates Should Say Sorry on Tanker to Boeing, Northrop CEOs</title> <atom:link href="http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/07/02/gates-should-say-sorry-on-tanker-to-boeing-northrop-ceos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/07/02/gates-should-say-sorry-on-tanker-to-boeing-northrop-ceos/</link> <description>Online Defense and Acquisition Journal</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:54:07 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: SuzyQ</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/07/02/gates-should-say-sorry-on-tanker-to-boeing-northrop-ceos/#comment-190</link> <dc:creator>SuzyQ</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 20:26:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=169#comment-190</guid> <description>Back to the subject of the Tanker Deal, it was clearly shall I say at minimal a &quot; huge mistake&quot; on the part of the USAF to award the contract to EADS/Airbus via NG.  There would be no argument to that statement had the GAO not investigated the entire matter and came to the same conclusion. And as Secretary Gates is one who is finally paying attention to matters of military/government failures, we should all pull together and fight for the cause that Boeing clearly has the better product, is years ahead of a foreign entity (EADS/FRANCE et al) and back the reversal of this absurd &quot;decision&quot;.  Thank goodness Boeing had the sense to challenge the USAF position</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back to the subject of the Tanker Deal, it was clearly shall I say at minimal a ” huge mistake” on the part of the USAF to award the contract to EADS/Airbus via NG.  There would be no argument to that statement had the GAO not investigated the entire matter and came to the same conclusion. And as Secretary Gates is one who is finally paying attention to matters of military/government failures, we should all pull together and fight for the cause that Boeing clearly has the better product, is years ahead of a foreign entity (EADS/FRANCE et al) and back the reversal of this absurd “decision”.  Thank goodness Boeing had the sense to challenge the USAF position</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Paul</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/07/02/gates-should-say-sorry-on-tanker-to-boeing-northrop-ceos/#comment-183</link> <dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 20:13:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=169#comment-183</guid> <description>Apply skills!One we can start here by posting our skills.Not using their lingo etc.But the actual lingo of scripture.Since scripture has our enemy Iran,doing nothing, we should be doing something else.But we are too overwhelmed by:Statements of terrorists?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apply skills!One we can start here by posting<br /> our skills.Not using their lingo etc.But the actual lingo of scripture.Since scripture has<br /> our enemy Iran,doing nothing, we should be doing<br /> something else.But we are too overwhelmed by:Statements of terrorists?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Paul</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/07/02/gates-should-say-sorry-on-tanker-to-boeing-northrop-ceos/#comment-182</link> <dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 20:09:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=169#comment-182</guid> <description>Clean and technical as possible? That&#039;s not possible under their own criteria.Even low level peolpe don&#039;t waste time with:Cleanness and always chase away,technicians...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clean and technical as possible? That’s not possible under their own criteria.Even low level<br /> peolpe don’t waste time with:Cleanness and always chase away,technicians…</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: TediusTim</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/07/02/gates-should-say-sorry-on-tanker-to-boeing-northrop-ceos/#comment-166</link> <dc:creator>TediusTim</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 09:02:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=169#comment-166</guid> <description>Please do not pain all Air Force Acq with the broad tar brush.  Inside of AFMC there are the Electronic System Center and outside of the AFMC there is Acquisition Group inside of Space Command.  If this is an issue of command influence by Aeronautical Systems Center(ASC) using one of these groups to take Best and Finals from both competitors rescore the proposals according to the regulations is the quickest and best way forward.It will take the open Commitment of Secretary Gates, Mr Young and the Acting Secretary of the Air Force to divert the Acq troops outside of ASC and possibly outside of AFMC to do ASC&#039;s work on the tanker proposal we have according to the regulations and the proposals in hand.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please do not pain all Air Force Acq with the broad tar brush.  Inside of AFMC there are the Electronic System Center and outside of the AFMC there is Acquisition Group inside of Space Command.  If this is an issue of command influence by Aeronautical Systems Center(ASC) using one of these groups to take Best and Finals from both competitors rescore the proposals according to the regulations is the quickest and best way forward.</p><p>It will take the open Commitment of Secretary Gates, Mr Young and the Acting Secretary of the Air Force to divert the Acq troops outside of ASC and possibly outside of AFMC to do ASC’s work on the tanker proposal we have according to the regulations and the proposals in hand.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Eric</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/07/02/gates-should-say-sorry-on-tanker-to-boeing-northrop-ceos/#comment-141</link> <dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 05:15:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=169#comment-141</guid> <description>I&#039;m so tired of the Acq workforce being blamed for all of these &quot;issues&quot; in the contract award business.  Let&#039;s face it, these contract awards are so large and politically charged that those of us who are apparently &quot;lacking in quality&quot; don&#039;t even have a chance to apply our skills and exercise our own integrity to the already extremely scrutinized process (thanks to other past criminals high up).  It&#039;s not the workforce that needs overhauled, it&#039;s the politicians and the SSAs that they should examine.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m so tired of the Acq workforce being blamed for all of these “issues” in the contract award business.  Let’s face it, these contract awards are so large and politically charged that those of us who are apparently “lacking in quality” don’t even have a chance to apply our skills and exercise our own integrity to the already extremely scrutinized process (thanks to other past criminals high up).  It’s not the workforce that needs overhauled, it’s the politicians and the SSAs that they should examine.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Colin Clark</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/07/02/gates-should-say-sorry-on-tanker-to-boeing-northrop-ceos/#comment-139</link> <dc:creator>Colin Clark</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 03:09:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=169#comment-139</guid> <description>The stand down would probably be for a few days or a week. My source didn&#039;t want to place a limit on it so as to leave that decision to those responsible for making it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The stand down would probably be for a few days or a week. My source didn’t want to place a limit on it so as to leave that decision to those responsible for making it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Penta</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/07/02/gates-should-say-sorry-on-tanker-to-boeing-northrop-ceos/#comment-135</link> <dc:creator>Penta</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 01:12:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=169#comment-135</guid> <description>Stand down the acquisition workforce...?How? For how long?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stand down the acquisition workforce…?</p><p>How? For how long?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: SuzyQ</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/07/02/gates-should-say-sorry-on-tanker-to-boeing-northrop-ceos/#comment-133</link> <dc:creator>SuzyQ</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:41:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=169#comment-133</guid> <description>GREAT ARTICLE MR. CLARK,  AND THANK YOU FOR ADDITIONAL NAMES TO CONTACT...... YOU ARE PERFORMING AN EXCELLENT SERVICE TO THE US!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GREAT ARTICLE MR. CLARK,  AND THANK YOU FOR ADDITIONAL NAMES TO CONTACT.….. YOU ARE PERFORMING AN EXCELLENT SERVICE TO THE US!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching using apc
Object Caching 682/714 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.dodbuzz.com

Served from: dodbuzz.com @ 2012-02-09 14:10:36 -->
