<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Strategist Mulls Expanding US Ground Forces</title> <atom:link href="http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/07/14/strategist-mulls-expanding-us-ground-forces/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/07/14/strategist-mulls-expanding-us-ground-forces/</link> <description>Online Defense and Acquisition Journal</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:54:51 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Eaat Shiite</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/07/14/strategist-mulls-expanding-us-ground-forces/#comment-19682</link> <dc:creator>Eaat Shiite</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 02:37:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=214#comment-19682</guid> <description>It&#039;s always a good laugh when the zionist/us forces get killed. I hope many more die before we finally pull our murdering forces out. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s always a good laugh when the zionist/us forces get killed. I hope many more die before we finally pull our murdering forces out.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Radarnav</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/07/14/strategist-mulls-expanding-us-ground-forces/#comment-418</link> <dc:creator>Radarnav</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:36:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=214#comment-418</guid> <description>I agree that current &amp; projected world threats means a much larger military.  Much better pay than today.  Anyone seeing a &quot;Deja Vu&quot; here to the later 70&#039;s and early 80&#039;s????However, it won&#039;t happen with the current Congressional leadership and at least 1 prospective Presidential candidate.  They want to increase social spending to increase social dependency while our enemies are gathering at the gates.History tells us that great powers die when they no longer function as great powers and try to accomodate their enemies instead of defeating them militarily, econcomically, and philosopically.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that current &amp; projected world threats means a much larger military.  Much better pay than today.  Anyone seeing a “Deja Vu” here to the later 70’s and early 80’s????</p><p>However, it won’t happen with the current Congressional leadership and at least 1 prospective Presidential candidate.  They want to increase social spending to increase social dependency while our enemies are gathering at the gates.</p><p>History tells us that great powers die when they no longer function as great powers and try to accomodate their enemies instead of defeating them militarily, econcomically, and philosopically.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Fred Avanti</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/07/14/strategist-mulls-expanding-us-ground-forces/#comment-299</link> <dc:creator>Fred Avanti</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:36:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=214#comment-299</guid> <description>Many things need to be done simultaneously in order to survive, and win. First, beef up the size and quality of all our Armed Forces, especially Ground forces (Infantry, Special Forces, Artillery &amp; Armor), raise military pay &amp; benefits smartly, improve intel capabilities, while at the same time work on the long-neglected diplomatic route thus reducing the number of enemies we will have to fight (the fewer the better); either way we should (and must) be ready for anything.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many things need to be done simultaneously in order to survive, and win. First, beef up the size and quality of all our Armed Forces, especially Ground forces (Infantry, Special Forces, Artillery &amp; Armor), raise military pay &amp; benefits smartly, improve intel capabilities, while at the same time work on the long-neglected diplomatic route thus reducing the number of enemies we will have to fight (the fewer the better); either way we should (and must) be ready for anything.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Seabee_5</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/07/14/strategist-mulls-expanding-us-ground-forces/#comment-290</link> <dc:creator>Seabee_5</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:42:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=214#comment-290</guid> <description>So, you will not publish my out cry for my Navy Brothers, which went down hard this weekend. Publish this or not Hoorah, Hoorah, and Hoorah for the Seals that gave their all. America you have forgotten your heroes, today is a very sad day!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, you will not publish my out cry for my Navy Brothers, which went down hard this weekend. Publish this or not Hoorah, Hoorah, and Hoorah for the Seals that gave their all. America you have forgotten your heroes, today is a very sad day!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Seabee_5</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/07/14/strategist-mulls-expanding-us-ground-forces/#comment-287</link> <dc:creator>Seabee_5</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:21:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=214#comment-287</guid> <description>Ed you think your statement is bad? Our top ops groups the Navy Seals are get the Medal of Honor and are making less then the regular soldiers that you quoted. Our Seals are in bad need of new recruits. We will not get them at the price we have for these warriors and we need to response to this elite forces when in trouble. Sunday four Seals got in trouble and no one came till hours later. The one survivor is in Germany and the ratio was one against 25 each bad guys. Where was the back up!!!!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed you think your statement is bad? Our top ops groups the Navy Seals are get the Medal of Honor and are making less then the regular soldiers that you quoted. Our Seals are in bad need of new recruits. We will not get them at the price we have for these warriors and we need to response to this elite forces when in trouble. Sunday four Seals got in trouble and no one came till hours later. The one survivor is in Germany and the ratio was one against 25 each bad guys. Where was the back up!!!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Cole</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/07/14/strategist-mulls-expanding-us-ground-forces/#comment-286</link> <dc:creator>Cole</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:14:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=214#comment-286</guid> <description>Never really thought about it until Boeing claimed $35 billion in savings over 40 years from claimed 25% better KC-767 fuel economy. That means using just 3-4% of the USAF fuel budget, our tankers might easily require over $105-140 billion in fuel over those 40 years...or $2.5-3.5 billion a year which would match the acquisition cost. Is that correct??Figures like those caused by rising oil costs will be THE major factor in deterring future adversary air forces. No other nation will be capable of spending anywhere near the amount we, and our allies spend in fuel, maintenance, and acquisition on air operations and training. Add to that the escalating cost of stealth, and air defenses against stealth, and it becomes clear that no nation will ever be able to afford to be a near-peer with our Joint airpower.That said, plenty of nations can cause problems with rockets and missiles..the poor nation&#039;s airpower alternative. Our airpower also cannot find many hidden targets WITHOUT ground contact and ISR cueing to reveal those targets. Even if found, targets often cannot be engaged by air due to rules of engagement, whereas less powerful ground weapons can engage and discriminate them.So the Catch 22 of our airpower is that while no other nation can match it head-to-head, they don&#039;t need to with ballistic missiles and rockets, and they can simply hide their troops or blend in with civilians. We have required ground forces in every conflict of the past, and every conflict of the future will continue to require ground forces.Sec of Defense Gates is correct that smaller conflicts will continue to dominate when our interests are threatened. As for major theater war, can&#039;t ever envision putting groundpower in mainland China or all of Iran, but defending neighbors or oil rights is always a possibility that could require troops on the ground.If Israel attacks Iran, and Iran follows through on threats to close the Straits of Hormuz, I would hope we would still have troops in Iraq to defend that nation and Kuwait, and to seize that portion of Iran closest to those narrow Straits....Like it or not, casualties or not, allies or not...only the U.S. has the budget and political will to support and deploy a large ground force anywhere in the world. But will that political will continue? We may not have a choice if Israel sees no recourse but to attack Iran.Problem is, if you think the price of gas is high NOW?? Even our nation may not be able to afford a large armed forces, and especially not a large Air Force, if our economy goes way south due to $200-250 a barrel oil caused by war with Iran. Our nation must find alternative sources of energy so that we are not held hostage by places like the Middle East.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never really thought about it until Boeing claimed $35 billion in savings over 40 years from claimed 25% better KC-767 fuel economy. That means using just 3–4% of the USAF fuel budget, our tankers might easily require over $105–140 billion in fuel over those 40 years…or $2.5–3.5 billion a year which would match the acquisition cost. Is that correct??</p><p>Figures like those caused by rising oil costs will be THE major factor in deterring future adversary air forces. No other nation will be capable of spending anywhere near the amount we, and our allies spend in fuel, maintenance, and acquisition on air operations and training. Add to that the escalating cost of stealth, and air defenses against stealth, and it becomes clear that no nation will ever be able to afford to be a near-peer with our Joint airpower.</p><p>That said, plenty of nations can cause problems with rockets and missiles..the poor nation’s airpower alternative. Our airpower also cannot find many hidden targets WITHOUT ground contact and ISR cueing to reveal those targets. Even if found, targets often cannot be engaged by air due to rules of engagement, whereas less powerful ground weapons can engage and discriminate them.</p><p>So the Catch 22 of our airpower is that while no other nation can match it head-to-head, they don’t need to with ballistic missiles and rockets, and they can simply hide their troops or blend in with civilians. We have required ground forces in every conflict of the past, and every conflict of the future will continue to require ground forces.</p><p>Sec of Defense Gates is correct that smaller conflicts will continue to dominate when our interests are threatened. As for major theater war, can’t ever envision putting groundpower in mainland China or all of Iran, but defending neighbors or oil rights is always a possibility that could require troops on the ground.</p><p>If Israel attacks Iran, and Iran follows through on threats to close the Straits of Hormuz, I would hope we would still have troops in Iraq to defend that nation and Kuwait, and to seize that portion of Iran closest to those narrow Straits.…</p><p>Like it or not, casualties or not, allies or not…only the U.S. has the budget and political will to support and deploy a large ground force anywhere in the world. But will that political will continue? We may not have a choice if Israel sees no recourse but to attack Iran.</p><p>Problem is, if you think the price of gas is high NOW?? Even our nation may not be able to afford a large armed forces, and especially not a large Air Force, if our economy goes way south due to $200–250 a barrel oil caused by war with Iran. Our nation must find alternative sources of energy so that we are not held hostage by places like the Middle East.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Seabee_5</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/07/14/strategist-mulls-expanding-us-ground-forces/#comment-285</link> <dc:creator>Seabee_5</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:15:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=214#comment-285</guid> <description>Hoorah, Hoorah, Hoorah. Bring back the draft and draft man and woman into combat units. Every time I say that brings goose bumps to me from the stand point of equality and the land of the free. We are no different than anyone else they have something we want___ DO It. More money for the combat troops you bet. If you distinguish your self in battle you get more bonuses instead of medals: how is that for more money, more money, more money.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoorah, Hoorah, Hoorah. Bring back the draft and draft man and woman into combat units. Every time I say that brings goose bumps to me from the stand point of equality and the land of the free. We are no different than anyone else they have something we want___ DO It. More money for the combat troops you bet. If you distinguish your self in battle you get more bonuses instead of medals: how is that for more money, more money, more money.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joseph B. Cryer</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/07/14/strategist-mulls-expanding-us-ground-forces/#comment-279</link> <dc:creator>Joseph B. Cryer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:24:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=214#comment-279</guid> <description>I would have to better understanding of current capabilities. I do know that the way we beat the Soviets was that we out spent them. Is that the strategy. With the oil prices at the current high prices it is enabling our enemies with financial resources usually not available.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have to better understanding of current capabilities. I do know that the way we beat the Soviets was that we out spent them. Is that the strategy. With the oil prices at the current high prices it is enabling our enemies with financial resources usually not available.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ed</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/07/14/strategist-mulls-expanding-us-ground-forces/#comment-278</link> <dc:creator>ed</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:17:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=214#comment-278</guid> <description>another thing we have to do is start increasing the amount of money we pay our military people.  it is a damn shame when we have guys sitting behind a desk in the civilian world making 60k to 200k right off the top and we have E-5 marines making 2500 a month.  And the country wonders why they lose all the good NCO&#039;s and Officers.  Pay them for what the do.  They risk their lives every day and get paid crap to do it.  Pay them the salary they deserve and you will see more guys staying in to serve....  Common sense people.  Damn i should run for office or secretary of defense.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>another thing we have to do is start increasing the amount of money we pay our military people.  it is a damn shame when we have guys sitting behind a desk in the civilian world making 60k to 200k right off the top and we have E-5 marines making 2500 a month.  And the country wonders why they lose all the good NCO’s and Officers.  Pay them for what the do.  They risk their lives every day and get paid crap to do it.  Pay them the salary they deserve and you will see more guys staying in to serve.…  Common sense people.  Damn i should run for office or secretary of defense.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ed</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/07/14/strategist-mulls-expanding-us-ground-forces/#comment-277</link> <dc:creator>ed</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:13:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=214#comment-277</guid> <description>in todays world, we have enemies all over the place and i think there are countries out there plotting against us in a big way.  we should increase our military forces to double what we have now.  i hate to say it, but places like Iran, Russia, China, France, and all the middle east countries are going to try to gang up on us one day and we need to be ready.  if we are going to maintain our status as a world super power then we need to continue increasing the amount of forces we have, not just troops, but jets, aircraft carries, subs, all of that.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in todays world, we have enemies all over the place and i think there are countries out there plotting against us in a big way.  we should increase our military forces to double what we have now.  i hate to say it, but places like Iran, Russia, China, France, and all the middle east countries are going to try to gang up on us one day and we need to be ready.  if we are going to maintain our status as a world super power then we need to continue increasing the amount of forces we have, not just troops, but jets, aircraft carries, subs, all of that.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/07/14/strategist-mulls-expanding-us-ground-forces/#comment-273</link> <dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:28:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=214#comment-273</guid> <description>Does Frederick Kagan in &quot;Ground Truth&quot; really believe that we would invade Iran with ground forces? How big is Iran? At least three times the size of Iraq, which is roughly the size of California in sq.miles. All we need is a three front war which would probably cause mutiny among some admirals and generals! I do agree with the statement that after ten years of advising and equipping the ARVN they still proved ineffective in Cambodia in 1970 and Laos in 1971. A lesson for what is going on now in Iraq.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does Frederick Kagan in “Ground Truth” really believe that we would invade Iran with ground forces? How big is Iran? At least three times the size of Iraq, which is roughly the size of California in sq.miles. All we need is a three front war which would probably cause mutiny among some admirals and generals! I do agree with the statement that after ten years of advising and equipping the ARVN they still proved ineffective in Cambodia in 1970 and Laos in 1971. A lesson for what is going on now in Iraq.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.006 seconds using apc
Object Caching 717/718 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.dodbuzz.com

Served from: dodbuzz.com @ 2012-02-09 13:15:05 -->
