AH-64: On Budget and On Schedule

AH-64: On Budget and On Schedule

Military acquisition is broken, crumbling, spastic — pick whatever term you wish but the experts all say that many Pentagon programs are over budget and behind schedule.

As the Government Accountability Office said in its recent report to the Senate Armed Services Committee: “Systemic problems both at the strategic and at the program level underlie cost growth and schedule delays. At the strategic level, DOD’s processes for identifying warfighter needs, allocating resources, and developing and procuring weapon systems-which together define DOD’s overall weapon system investment strategy-are fragmented and broken. At the program level, weapon system programs are initiated without sufficient knowledge about system requirements, technology, and design maturity.”

So when the good folks at Boeing held a briefing today on the Apache helicopter Block 3 upgrade, I was prepared to hear excuses, rationales and papering-overing. What I got was simple and a delight to hear. This program is on budget and on schedule. It is meeting its Key Performance Parameters with room to spare, according to Boeing’s VP for Apache programs, Al Winn. “So far, it’s a very successful program,” Winn said.

The Block 3 improvements are pretty fundamental, requiring a new airframe, more than 1 million lines of code, a new transmission system, longer range and automatic recognition radar, UAV connectivity, the ability to communicate with a much wider range of platforms (but not stealthy aircraft), software that will help the air crew make rapid decisions and a host maintenance management systems that are expected to reduce the average flight hours lost to fixing and maintaining things by 30 percent.

Basically, they are rebuilding the existing 634 strong Apache fleet. So I asked Winn what had kept them on track, what management tips could he offer the beleaguered acquisition corps. After jokingly claiming that it was all due to (his) brilliant leadership, he gave the usual answer about a great team. Then we got down to brass tacks. The program was able to rein in the requirements people.

The program at one point was “bloated” with the usual list of requirements, everything a soldier might ever want in a perfect helicopter. A “program control board” at Boeing, as well as one set up with the Army, kept a vigilant eye on the requirements. And they called in one big gun to help get things made right: Army Vice Chief of Staff Gen. Richard Cody. The general intervened and the requirements got pared down, Winn said.

Things can still spiral out of control on some front since the program is half-way to its finish date. But Cody gets weekly updates through the chain of command. And he is very close to this program. One week after the first test flight, Cody climbed into the cockpit and flew the first Block 3 chopper. Yes, there was a test pilot in the back seat, but Winn swears the general flew the bird on his own. With someone like that watching their back, we bet Winn has a decent chance of turning in a program on time and on budget. And won’t that be, sadly, all too remarkable.

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Join the Conversation

I am glad to hear this. Great work Boeing!

General Cody can give a good cleaning out of the rest of the programs that are behind. Will someone please make this General an expiditer for more than this program! Boeing you are running out of time. This should be the norm so I cannot say thank you to you.

Gen. Cody just retired.

What other Army programs do you feel are behind schedule? The Block III Apache and CH-47F are both Boeing products that are on track, as is FCS despite press grumblings. The UH-60M model will shortly be fielded to the 101st Airborne (AA) at Fort Campbell. An MH-47 derivative would be perfect for Air Force CSAR with little developmental risk.

Only the ARH is having trouble and that is hardly an Army-caused or Boeing problem. In my PERSONAL opinion we could scrap the ARH and buy additional Block III Apaches to replace ARH/OH-58D on a one AH for two OH basis and allow manned-unmanned aircraft teaming to perform the armed reconnaissance and attack helicopter mission.

*required

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement