More Civil Defense, Just Don’t Call it That

More Civil Defense, Just Don’t Call it That

When the IRA was blowing up London, one saw posters in the Tube and everywhere else people congregated warning people to tell the police about unattended packages. They were simple posters, a bit scary and they worked pretty well. People reported packages and the police were able to isolate bombs on several occasions before they went off. The famous IRA warnings helped as well.

After the Madrid bombings, the British put up new posters showing a woman looking at an unattended suitcase: “If You Suspect It, Report It.” In Israel, a stray cigarette pack can draw the public’s attention. But you don’t see many warnings in New York or in Washington about packages of any sort, though there are occasional posters and security warnings. And, of course, we all remember former Department of Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge’s famous efforts to get the public to prepare their homes for a major catastrophe. (Mention of duct tape still draws rueful smiles from many of our friends who live in the city’s center.)

So when I asked the head of Northern Command, Air Force Gen. Victor Renuart if thought the US needed better civil defense efforts to deter the sort of small scale attacks (suicide vests etc) Al Qaeda and other terrorists might turn to, he approached it gingerly. He told the audience at the Heritage Foundation today that “personal prevention and our ability to be resilient in the event of an attack” were crucial. He noted that Al Qaeda faces serious command and control difficulties when it tries to mount smaller scale attacks. But, when pressed, he agreed that the country needs better “civil awareness programs.”

Perhaps we should wait until the next administration before trying to launch anything new on this front since the Bush administration has generally lost so much credibility when it comes to terror warnings and efforts to mitigate the effects of terrorist attacks. And there is always the chicken and egg problem — which came first, the small bombs and random shootings or the posters warning of them — but the American people aren’t really aware of the threat and their government is doing relatively little to ensure they can help be part of the intelligence system.

As Gen. Renuart made clear at the end of his talk, the topic carries heavy political baggage. After acknowledging the need for more civil defense, he smiled and told me: “Just don’t build a bomb shelter just yet.”

Join the Conversation

Why, you might want to ask is it so hard for people in the US to want to do the right thing? Is it because we are all driving in a different direction or is it because people care more for where they came from than for where thay are at? We are under attack but we worry that someone placed a camera in a public place more than someone placing a bomb. The world has changed as it will always do but we are not changing with it, our young people think that ” If you are nice to them they will be nice to you ” we all know that is not the case. We are in for some very hard times in the future, a great many changes will to pass and I fear that our nation is not up to it it remins me of the way we were just before the start of thw second World War trying to stick our heads in the sand and hope they would pass us by.

We ae worse than just before WW II. Then we didn’t have actual pictures or real time viewing of some of the atrocities being committed around the world. Today we have 24/7 coverage and are so use to seeing it, we choose to ignore it, because it isn’t happening to us, right now!

If you want peace, you must prepare for War. A nation that is perceived as strong militarily normally doesn’t get attacked. But the second part of this is you must be strong minded and persevere through adversity. We forget too soon and we forgive to easy.

Besides when only 1% of our nation is fighting the war while the other 99% is in the mall, you really don’t show you care very much. Support the troops openly, 24/7, speak out more forcefully for winning the war, not just ending it!

God Bless America-De Oppresso Liber!!!!

Second time I am sticking in my 2 cents worth. I am a Pearl Harbor Survivor as well as a veteran of the guadacanal battle and others later. What I am getting at is my dad was very ivolved in the civil defense in WW11. Was a Airraid Wasrden during the entire War. His Air raid Helmet sits in my garage here in Florida along with my Helmet, Veryh prooud to have them both. He passed away 31 years ago.

Sounds good; maybe should be a role of the National Guard: or what do they do these days?
Naw, really, citizens should feel free to handle it. But, ah me, where does the money come from? How is it organized? Getting into structure could be messy.

Saw Gen Renuart on C-Span and he was very impressive. Talk about having a full plate. Everything from NORAD to Homeland Security to assistance to states.

Just as the Army has embraced Stability and Civil Support on an equal basis as Offense and Defense, the Air Force should consider the dual-nature of its systems during the procurement process. A MH-47 based CSAR aircraft could greatly assist any state’s natural disaster assistance, be it flooding or forest fires. A KC-X aircraft with ample payload for pallets and fuel can deliver supplies to areas in the U.S. and overseas. Systems like Predator could be used in a block of airspace altitude, time, and lateral separation to conduct reconnaissance of disaster-stricken areas and to search for survivors.

Considering that many of these systems could end up in the National Guard enhances their capability to support both wartime and peace disaster missions.

*required