Landmark Speech by Gen. Schwartz

Landmark Speech by Gen. Schwartz

Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Norton Schwartz delivered an hour-long address to the Air Force Association today that will probably be remembered as a landmark in the remaking of the service.

The most enduring comments for the service will probably be those addressing the issue of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) in which Schwartz called for a shift from the fighter pilot-centric service to one that treats unmanned aircraft pilots with equal respect, “not as a leper community.”

In a passionate address, Schwartz also criticized industry for going too far during the tanker competition and criticized former general officers who came out in favor of particular programs. What did the blue suiters think of Schwartz’s speech? They gave him a 35-second standing ovation.

One thing sure to send shudders through the defense industry was the general’s comments about former generals working for industry and touting specific weapons. After the speech he told reporters that “taking public positions in major acquisition programs and indicating you are doing so on the basis of your prior active duty service” was not acceptable. “What I think we need to avoid is having the American public believe is that their military leadership can be bought,” he told us.

Throughout the speech the difficulty of Schwartz’s balancing act between pointing out the flaws of the service when he took it over and the changes he hopes to implement grew more and more obvious. “We find the Air Force is at a critical point,” he said, adding that he needed “everyone’s help, especially the folks who are in this room.”

Just a few sentences later, he veered to admonish those who might feel that the service — beset by the tanker fiasco, the CSAR-X debacle, the nuclear miscues, the firing of the service’s two top leaders — is in a tailspin. “But don’t let anyone see your head hanging in despair,” he said. Then he went on to relate tales of heroism and competence by airmen. Interestingly, the two examples he detailed involved special operations personnel. He did not mention any pilots.

He noted that the service faces “some significant institutional obstacles” in terms of acquisition and, he said, “we must deal with them in short order.” Relations between industry and the service are crucial, he pointed out. But there has been an “unfortunate deterioration of the relationship between the Air Force and the industry that of late manifests hyperbole, insensitivity and a lack of proper communication.”

He asked if acquisition decisions should be “excessively influenced by interests other than military requirements inside and outside of government.” Instead, “we must exercise caution with systems that a particular vendor wishes to build or those programs which satisfy a particular constituency.” This, he said, is “a matter of trust.” How important is this? “The health of Department of Defense acquisition is at stake.”

Schwartz went on at some length during his speech to tell his audience that the fighter mafia was no longer in charge of the Air Force. He announced during his speech that that the service would create a new program training pilots for unmanned aerial systems.

“We are going to transform our culture,” Brig. Gen. Lyn Sherlock, director of air operations for the directorate of operations, told reporters at a briefing held after Schwartz’s speech. The service plans to train up to 1,100 UAS pilots by 2012, starting with a pilot program of 10 pilots, Sherlock said. The program should start in January.

In his remarks, Schwartz made clear that the Air Force was no longer run by the fighter mafia, saying that being close to the target conferred no special status on someone. After his speech I asked him if he was trying to create an unmanned mafia. His response, sure to be long remembered by fighter pilots everywhere: “I don’t believe in tribes.”

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Join the Conversation

The return of a strategic command?

Disregarding retired Generals shilling for contractors?

The destruction of the fighter pilot mafia?

The Air Force is finally on the right track with the right leader.

Um…can we ditch AFSO21 now?

Wow–what a message–finally. The Core Values just might return after all. Maybe the Thunderbirds don’t need a $50M “Jumbotron” Strategic Messaging billboard afterall, even though a retired 4-star co-owns the company selling them. Maybe, just maybe, we do not need to spend billions on Raptors when our ememies live in populated cities and have no aircraft. Now this is really crazy–maybe we do not need all of the spy hardware, since our enemies mostly communicate in-person and sometimes only use a piece of paper the size of an index card.

There is not a lot of money in consulting if you are not selling aircraft or space satellites. No big money in selling index cards.

Is there a retired General Officer that’s not cashing in on his stars? Anybody that is NOT working for a beltway bandit?

How about this–create a “Save our Generals” fund, or SOG. Get people together to make monthly donations to the retired GOs. For just dollars a day, YOU could sponsor a GO an ensure he/she maintains the lifestyle they are accustomed to–private jets, Mediterranean vacations, European or Pacific Northwest dining (depending upon EADS-Boeing viewpoint) and big ol’ offices!

A lot of GOs out there shilling for contractors. When they were on Active Duty, they were shilling officer promotions for the guys they were sponsoring–with top cover from their retired, contractor-entrenched sponsors. It almost seems like a version of the Sapranos. Look at the number of GOs out there who’s father was a GO. Was it genetics or destiny that brough Jr up through the ranks? Some do make it to the upper ranks on merit and proven ability to perform and get results—and one of those guys FINALLY made it to the top rung. Just what the Air Force needed–just in time.

I disagree about not needing more Raptors. Our enemies today may not be our enemies tomorrow. The Raptor is needed to maintain air superiority against a peer or near-peer power.

We need the F22s in case we have to fight the Decepticons.

The military leadership can be bought. Look at the DOD manager of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program. He parrots everything LM says about the jet. A jet which has a lot of problems to solve, has little flight testing done and well given that new build F-16s can do most AEFs ( not all hence F-22s to clear the way )… it seems the program manager has gone native.

USAF is running out of fighters and the F-35 is not the answer. Too much gold plating.

How will the General deal with the never ending congressional gravy train of C-17s all while the C-5 upgrade languishes?

Where is the stand-off jammer (B-52 mod )?

Will the ping-pong game by PowerPoint Warriors by putting maintenance under ops and back and forth ever end?

The General has a lot of work to do.

It is interesting to watch the Marching Band, Cheerleaders, and Drill Team and Water Boys cheering the firing of the Old Coach. This Coach, in trying to build a good team in preparation for the big game, was declared to be “out of step” with the egalitarian populism of the School’s Administration because he insisted that serious money be spent in recruiting talented players. The Administration however, is more concerned that there might not be enough funds for next week’s homecoming parade and dance which, after all, will benefit more people than just the football players.

Never mind that those applauding the Coach’s firing have always been a bit jealous of the Coach and the players for all the attention they’ve received over the years.

Things will be much better now that our priorities are straight. The New Coach understands that it is more important for the Band and the Drill Team to feel that they are as important as the football players, and if it means losing the big game,well.. that will be a small price to pay for our new feel good atmosphere. Besides, the New Coach knows that he will be retired before the kickoff of the Big Game.

Hay how about this, Scrap the F-22 and F-35, build new F-15s, F-16s, and new all weather day/night capable A-10s, C-5s, more C-130s and C-17s and we MUST have new tankers, I’d go for the 767 (more flexible and can get into and out of more air strips, a tanker doesn’t need to also be a full fledge cargo aircraft or passenger carrier, but able to augment them). We need to bring back the old Manuals and Regulations, end the marry-go-round of new uniforms, and concentrate on mission, leadership, responsibility and the fact that the USAF is one of the UNIFORM services, which means that we 1. Wear a uniform, 2. Do things in a uniform manner. 3. Take responsibility for your own actions and the actions of your troops, under your command, even if you are an Airman (E-2) in charge of a detail of yourself and an Airman Basic. All personnel should remember that you’ve taken an oath to defend the Constitution, not to play politics or to line your own pockets. You must be flexible in command, and service. We don’t have to spend all of the money in the mint, but need to consider just what is really needed and remember that we are responsible to the American citizen, that’s who we work for.

*required

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement