Space Radar Plan, React In — All Hush Hush

Space Radar Plan, React In — All Hush Hush

The intelligence community has sent its detailed plans for the next version of the Space Radar program to the House and Senate intelligence committees, fulfilling an obligation place upon it by lawmakers in last year’s defense authorization bill.

That word came from Vice Adm. Robert Murrett, director of the National Geospatial Intelligence Agency (NGA) at a breakfast he had with Defense Writers Group reporters this morning. When I asked Murrett if he and his cohorts had sent the plan to Congress, he affirmed that they had and added one interesting detail: the plan calls for a “multi-tiered constellation.”

He wouldn’t elaborate (heading out the door in a rush as he was) but I understand this includes a mix of foreign radar data, possible US commercial systems and the highly classified radar system that was the object of the last five years of unsuccessful haggling between the military and the intelligence community. The basic disagreement was over conflicting requirements for surface moving target indication required by the military and the so-called strategic radar system for which the intelligence folks rooted. It all ended about nine months ago when the NRO formally canceled the program admitting it would cost too much and might be just too technologically challenging.

A source familiar with the program told me after the breakfast that there is detailed language reacting to the new plan in the classified portion of the just-passed appropriations conference report. But, of course, since it’s classified I did not get any details.

This source also argued that the Space Radar program should be taken from the black realm where it currently resides and be moved to the Air Force because the intelligence community — particularly the NRO — is just not competent enough to manage such a highly complex program: “Bottom line, I think it it is time to put Space Radar back in the Air Force. I’ve got to tell you the Air Force is better placed to handle this program than the NRO.”

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Join the Conversation

“I’ve got to tell you the Air Force is better placed to handle this program than the NRO.”

Yes, after all, just imagine the horrible dog’s breakfast that NRO would have made of something like SBIRS!

Density,

The source I spoke with voiced very specific concerns about SR program management. I had to leave them out because the source could be probably be identified from reading them… This isn’t so much about AF vs. NRO in terms of competence (you’re right — neither has been very uplifting when it comes to space program execution in the last five years — all those launches notwithstanidng…) but more about the people and policies involved in SR.

Colin

Well, the last paragraph claims that it’s a systemic problem; “the intelligence community…is just not competent enough…”

Seems like the chief problem here is that you have two different users, with completely different requirements, and some idiot in Congress is making them work together because “hey, it’s all Radar, right?” As though binoculars and cameras were the same thing because they both involve lenses!

*required

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement