New Rules Coming for Contractors

New Rules Coming for Contractors

The war in Iraq has been a windfall for hired muscle, with private security types able to pull in hundreds of dollars a day — at times doing the same job as a soldier. In some instances, senior managers for a company like Blackwater — the North Carolina-based company whose name is synonymous with armed contractors — could pull in more than a grand a day, according to reports.

But between any future U.S-host nation status of forces agreement — including one the United States and are pushing to nail down before Dec. 31 — and the Army’s new stability operations field manual, the boomtown days of for armed contractors may be numbered, say Army officials.

In response to questions by Dod Buzz during the Association of the U.S. Army conference in Washington, D.C., officials said the rules under which Blackwater and other private security companies have been operating are going to change, including in Iraq. Furthermore, they suggested that if FM 3-07, the stability operations guide, is implemented correctly, there may be less need to have private security.

“SOFAs will direct a lot of that in the countries” the United States deploys troops to, said Lt. Gen. William Caldwell, commander of the Combined Arms Center at Ft. Leavenworth, Kansas, the command that oversees the Command and General Staff College. “We could see a major shift even next year in Iraq, if you want to talk very specifically [with] what contractors may or may not be able to do as the year 2009 rolls along.”

But if the steps spelled out in the new field manual are fully factored into planning even before any hostilities, then actions taken right after the shooting stops — establishing or re-establishing health care, a judiciary, public works and security, etc. — could reduce the need or likelihood of private security moving in.

Private contractors have proven expensive to the United States not only in terms of their financial costs, but politically. Blackwater security forces have developed a reputation as being cowboys in Iraq, particularly after a shootout in September 2007 in Baghdad that left 17 civilians dead.

At about the same time federal prosecutors announced they would investigate Blackwater for allegedly smuggling weapons into Iraq; some reports claimed the weapons were going to the Kurdish Workers’ Party, or PKK, which has been fighting a hit-and-run war with Turkey.

On Oct. 9 Blackwater announced it had organized a group of defense experts and former prosecutors to monitor itself and make sure it followed U.S. export laws.

“I can see those [rules for private security forces] changing,” Caldwell said. “I can see other nations taking a much different approach to how they allow them to operate in the future, based on things that everybody’s heard.”

Join the Conversation

I think it’s ridiculous. George Clemenceau said “War is too important a matter to be left to the military.” There are very serious flaws is the US military, but that is a different point. The US government needs contractors. They go in and do jobs the military cannot do because of political reasons. Contractors are good at what they do - they protect, kill, and get paid. I feel safe at night knowing there is a PMC killing extremists in a country where we don’t have troops. Let them work freely!

I totally agree, the Contractors are not just run of the mill soldiers they highly ex. special forces operators, the government has spent millions on them to train them to do there job at such a high level that no one can compete. So I really don’t see the problem of using PMC’s to help out outstretched military that already has serious flaws as Jake said.

Contractors an updated term for “hired guns”. Why not contract with the Mafia? This nation is losing whatever “moral authority” it ever had engaging in clandestine operations which have little to do with “American Interests” another buzzword thrown around loosely and never really defined.

They are not hired guns. Hired guns destroy an African town so a company can mine the resources nearby without any trouble. These men provide safety and security in many unstable parts of the world and get paid a very large amount of money, as they should. I don’t know where you learned of contractors, Willie, Army of Two or some other movie or video game, but that isn’t what they do.

I’ve got an idea get the military to do the things the contractors are doing like working in the chow halls or doing the force protection on the FOBs and COBs, how about the water plants or sewerage or 100’s of other things not just security out side the wire. Oh, I forgot they can’t get enough people well let’s start the draft oh that’s not PC. Well maybe they should growup and realize that not all contractors are cowboys (which is bad for the cowboys) and that some people are need.

I think contractors are just out for the money. Some of them may not have the morals needs to preserve the U.S. Government because they are not government people, but rather they are special interest groups. I feel that contractors if they choose could bring the picture a very unAmerican prospective to the picture.

Look up history every war has had it’s private soldiers some were called mercenaires some even called pirates. We have used civilians before look at the OSI and other secret groups. Hell we even used Rambo after he was out of active duty. Contractors will always be a part of war, and usually the most dangerous is the leader who is a civilian we call him the President of the US, he orders us to battle and make decisions as to when and where we go and who we fight, he is in the news every day, he wears a civilian suit and directs us to our death. So what the hell an other civilian out there is not a big deal.

I think the solution would really be to come up with some way of integrating them, at least in part, into the military. I don’t mean as a matter of being in the same command structure. Classify them as “unorganized militia,” allowing them to continue to function in their semi-autonomous way, but with that slightly higher accountability the paper pushers want.

I love the way everyone keeps calling them “contractors”. I can’t help but wonder if they actually recognize the historical implications of the term (cf. “condotteri”), or if they just wanted something that sounds better than “mercenaries”.

Also…you know, I think that this probably falls under the “letters of marque and reprisal” clause. So this is really more about Congress failing in its duty to sufficiently control the actions of (and define a proper role for) military contractors.

IF I GO IN I WANT BLACKWATER COVERING ME.

They’re not mercs, why can’t you people understand that?!?!

As a retired Army SF 0-6 and VP of a company affiliated with a security services provider in Iraq, I can say that the great majority of those providing such services are professionals who simply see themselves as soldiering on for better pay in a different venue. As has been pointed out not only by the companies themselves but by the satisfied customers, they do work that the military and the State Department security people simply don’t have the people to do themselves. And very, very few are “cowboys,” and those that are don’t last long; nobody wants a “cowboy” covering their backs.

I was a contractor during the surge for 15 months. A think couple clarifications are in order. Most of the contractors are not in security roles; rather they fill gaps in ifrastructure construction and operations. It’s not the easy street lucrative job it’s made out to be. Most live in austere conditions and close to 1200 have been KIA. A few come for the money and they don’t last long; typical employee turnover is 30%. Most of the contractors are ex military and desire to serve again. I quit a good job to go there and “Support Our Troops”. The branch of military that was my family for a time, over 30 years ago, asked for help and I decided to go. No regrets and the hell with the envious wanabees.

Having served with three PMC’s in 2004-2005, I can say that they are not all alike. Neither are the pelple who work for them.

The information officer for one of those companies would sign his route reports with, “Alert, professional, serious, and courteous PSD operators send the right message to everyone. Tough guys, gunsels, cowboys, and action adventure figures with deep xenophobia issues send a message, too: the wrong one.” Well said.

An idiot with something to prove can get you killed, embarass the company he works for, and ultimately discredit the nation. That impairs the bottom line: the mission.

After about 25,000 miles over the road, I can say that the Rules of Engagment have always been clear in Iraq and everyone knows the rules: ‘You do not approach a convoy.’Most of the time adequate warning is given where individuals forget that and everyone walks away. WHen people don’t back off it’s a pretty good sign that their intentions are hostile.

The reconstuction effort in Iraq does not move forward without contractors and reconstruction has been the mission since the end of ‘the war.’

Armed contractors are the second largest force in Iraq and ountumber the Brits about 10 to 1. Our casualty figures are testimony to that fact. The more restrictions you place on contractors the less effective they will be. The bad guys will find ways to push the envelope and more people will die, including contractors, which is what the bad guys want.

That PMC’s have their own internal problems should be no surprise. In addition to a few cowboys we have had our share of opportunists and the just plain incompetent. That doesn’t mean you paint them all with the same brush.

I agree whole heartedly with John E. I am a contractor and have been since April 2001. I have been to Iraq two times and what I have seen is a bunch of proud Americans helping our troops serve our great country. Both times I was there, I did not even carry a weapon, nor did the 35 great personnel who were with me. Most of us dont do this for the money as the possibility of losing our lives makes the money not worth it. We do this as we are Americans who love our great country and want to help win this war so our kids and grandkids dont have to do this. There are always a few bad apples who give us all a bad name but having been there, I know that the bad stories we hear in the media are the exception and not the rule. God bless the USA.

I think as a former soldier and one who’s MOS was taken over by contractors. After the restructure had to re class, the bottom line is that contractors are not helping the military, and for those who think the military is “unorganized” I would like to know who long you have been involved with the military and how much you really know about what is going on. Do you know that a contractor that is doing my same job is paid three times as much? It bothers me that people keep saying the military has serious flaws, and I wonder how long you have served. And the contractor that thinks they live in austere conditions, most have the freedom to go and do what they want when they want with much better conditions then the military.

It’s the payroll that bothers the bankers running our Republic. They have no problem with contractors…they do have a problem when JoeContractor or JoePlumber makes more than their aristocratic brains want to pay.

We are not mercenaries, look up the definition. We do a job just like everybody else does. And there have been Contracters in every war like Marshal said. We protect high profile and diplomatic personel because the State department and Military dont have enough people. We are not out there killing people and doing what ever we want. When I was in the Army over here, I had less rules then I do now when I rule out the gates.

I agree contractors are needed and there is a bad apple in everything.And if they get paid good thats good they take the risks also working in a envirement wee its dangerous make the buck.people will allways talk!we are all in this!

if only the facts would be said, that we can’t nor will we send enough military over there, so we must fill the gap. so how do we do that. hire civilians. i went over for 24 months. yes i went for the money. but, as a convoy commander with KBR. the military must have the support, at any cost. with out it, what would everybody say, if the death numbers were 10,000
or even more. the life of ever american is worth so much more, i say military as well as american contractors lose thier lives, to support OUR country. Let find something to cry about.

william cuthbertson

They get paid way too much. The only reason our government is allowing such ludacris spending is because of the money they themselves are making. Contracters are important and cover many ends our military cannot, but us, the taxpayers are getting robbed…

Thank goodness that there is Blackwater, I don’t believe that any other company or the military itself could provide the security needed for stability ops in a more professional manner. I would be honored to have the “cowboys” protect me. Do you have any idea of the unpaid compassionate services that Blackwater provides. Are mistakes never made in war? In a split second now, friend or foe, live or die.

About the money. The hourly rates are not all that great. As an engineer I was making a little over 2/3’s for what I earn in a equal stateside job. The thing that made it lucrative was working six and an half days a week and the foreign earned income exclusion. See IRS pub 54. The first $88k is tax free. Without that contracting for the U.S. military is a hazardous low pay job.

It is common for a few low ranking military to complain about contractor pay. They also complain about officer pay, and just about everything else. The senior career military get burned out from constant deployments and never let a day go by without expressing appreciation for help recieved.

It is also common for contractors to quit; some after only two weeks. Most quit and go home. A few quit and go to work in civilian jobs in the Arab GCC countries; which is quite lucrative.

Contracting companies struggle to fill positions and there are always more openings than willing bodies. The complainers should apply for the job; if they are not afraid of a little WORK!

Cowboys with guns that don’t care about colateral damage. That’s my view of them.

The ability to field a military that can meet the manning requirements is a pre-requisite. If you cannot do that… think before you use the military.

If these guys really want to serve so bad… the military is hiring… I can give any of you professional types the name of a good recruiter, if your desire to serve is as great as you claim…

Many of these “patriots” don’t like the rules of the military or the BS that they have to “put up with…” small prices to pay if your goal is true selfless service to our nation…

If you want to mow the grass, or wash the clothes, or run the Burger King on Victory… God Bless You… contract away… If you want to be an “operator” go see your recruiter or find a good Play Station game.

Don’t attempt to drape the flag across your adrenaline rush and call it patriotism. Combatants not in Uniform are terrorists or spies… at least that is how we characterize them at Gitmo…

As for Blackwater… their hiring of ex-commandos from Latin American dictatorships speaks for itself… are those guys American Patriots as well…

Give us all a break… keep lying to yourselves in the Blackwater break room… but don’t ask everyone else to believe your blathering…

If you are a Blackwater mercenary and don’t believe what I’m saying… then start checking… it’s not hard to find… especially for those who speak Spanish… those countries are roundly condemning Blackwater’s use of soldiers they consider unfit to serve in the military of a democracy…

I dont understand why some of you dont get it, Its a job and we are taking advantage of it,you all would to if you had the experience.The Army wouldnt give me what I want and then came BW and offered this and that and I couldnt pass it up. Maybe if the government would pay our Military more like they deserve , so many wouldnt be leaving.Oh ya we do care about colateral damage dvortex, we screw up its our ass and there goes our job and no more big pay checks.And to you John D, I put up with more BS and rules now then I did as a soldier so what the fuck you talking about?

I went from the Army and into straight into contracting. Frankly, I wanted a job (shame on me) and no one in Indiana was hiring. I volunteered for Bosnia, Kosovo and Afghanistan because (some of you will believe this) it allowed me to continue to serve after hitting my MRD. To JOHN D> I’m 61 - Army ain’t gonna hire me, but KBR will.

John D,
As I write this, I’m getting ready for my 4th 6-month deployment to Afghanistan. I’ve got 3 deployments to Iraq on top of that. Financially, I make about the same as a deployed CWO-4 with 25 years in service. When I’m deployed, I work 16 hours a day, 7 days a week. I’m on-call 24/7. I live in the same quarters as the soldiers I support, I eat the same chow, carry the same load, ride the same vehicles, and get shot at with the same bullets, rockets, and mortars. I’ve been shot at so many times over the last few years, I don’t even get excited about it any more. I could be sitting back in the States in a nice office, managing a program or something like that, and probably making more money, but I have a fairly unique skill set that’s needed in the field. I’m too old to enlist, even though I have to and do keep up with guys 30 years younger than myself. I have to “put up with” the same rules as the people I support.I’m subject to the UCMJ, just like everyone else.I go way, way outside the scope of my contract to ensure that the people I work for get the level of support they need to accomplish the mission. Don’t question my patriotism,or my motives. Don’t refer to me as a terrorist. Just go back to your couch and continue with your game of Halo.

There are several problems; 1, the cost, pay the military more and enlistment will go up. 2, we should know the exact forces we have in a war zone and what they are doing ( it took a long time for it to be known that we did not have 100,00 in Iraq but closer to 200,000 when everyone was counted.)

*required