Army Awards JLTV Contracts

Army Awards JLTV Contracts

The Army announced today that it had awarded contracts worth $166 million to three industry teams to develop the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle, also variously known as the Humvee replacement, although this vehicle will be much more than the ubiquitous Humvee. The winners are Lockheed Martin; General Tactical Vehicles (a joint venture between General Dynamic Land Systems and AM General, manufacturer of the Humvee); and BAE Systems.

The contracts are for the technology development phase of the protracted DOD production process, expected to take 27 months, when each team will produce at least seven prototypes. The idea is to build a “family” of JLTV’s sharing common parts but available in different configurations such as a six seat infantry carrier, a four seat recon, command and control, heavy weapons carrier and ambulance. Once the prototypes are tested, the Army will hold yet another competition to down select one or more winners for the System Development and Demonstration phase. Full scale production is expected in 2013.

The Army and Marines have not finalized the total number of JLTV’s they ultimately want to buy, but an Army press release said the request for proposals included a projected production quantity of 60,000 over eight years. The ultimate production number will almost certainly be much higher. Former Army Vice Chief Gen. Richard Cody, in an appearance before a House appropriations subcommittee last year, said the Army intends for the JLTV to replace 130,000 of the service’s Humvees. Australia decided this week to join the JLTV program and might buy up to 4,200 vehicles.

The joint Army-Marine Corps JLTV will strike a balance between performance, payload and protection, said Col. John Myers, Project Manager with the Army’s Joint Combat Support Services, in the Army press release. Unlike the Humvee, which was originally designed as a rear area and garrison vehicle and was converted into a passable fighting vehicle by slapping armor and weapons onto it, the JLTV will be designed from the ground up as a fighting vehicle incorporating lessons learned from the fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Whereas the costly and lumbering MRAP vehicles (versions of which cost up to $1.2 million each) were always viewed as stop-gap to provide better protection against the scourge of roadside bombs in Iraq, the Army and Marines view JLTV as a long-term solution. To please the expeditionary focused Marines, the JLTV will be lighter than the Humvee, weighing between 3,500 and 5,100 pounds. A fully armored Humvee weighs 12,000 pounds and more. The JLTV is expected to be more resistant to mine blasts than the Humvee, will ride higher off the ground to provide added clearance and will incorporate a V-shaped hull that deflects blasts outward.

The vehicles must be light and compact enough to be carried underneath the Army’s CH-47 Chinook workhorse cargo lifter and the Marine’s CH-53 Super Stallion heavy lifter, and two JLTV vehicles must fit inside the Air Force’s C-130. The target cost per vehicle is was $200,000 to $250,000, according to a May 2006 Office of Naval Research JLTV industry day conference finding. The Army now estimates per vehicle cost at $418,000. An armored Humvee costs around $150,000.

Update: I blew it on the vehicle weight, those are payload weights. The vehicle will likely come in closer to 16,000 to 18,000 pounds. Thanks DOD Buzz readers for steering me straight.

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Join the Conversation

“May 2006: $200-260K?”

Don’t recall where, but it seems like I read it will be more like $400-450K now which somewhat shocked me until I saw what MRAPs cost. Don’t believe they envisioned quite as much armor originally.

With that armor, seems like I read that many versions will be 20,000 lbs.…which explains the Chinook and CH-53.

Here is a very recent GAO report:

http://​www​.fas​.org/​s​g​p​/​c​r​s​/​w​e​a​p​o​n​s​/​R​S​2​2​9​4​2​.​pdf

Also check out Wikipedia, Greg. The weights you listed are payloads…not the vehicle weight.

The GAO report points out that the Army may not be able to afford to buy 60,000 JLTV as originally desired. And with all the MRAP purchases and perfectly good uparmored Hummers that can be refurbished, you would think we could get by with fewer. Use the MRAPs as engineer replacements for M-113s.

I believe 16,500 is the vehicle wt requirement as stated in the PD. BAE’s JLTV scales in at 16,300 lbs which is suppose to be the only vehicle of the three winners that actually meets the weight req.

I guess I am going to need a bigger garage.

*required

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement