<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Wynne Criticizes Young’s F-22 Decision</title> <atom:link href="http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/11/12/youngs-oks-more-f-22s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/11/12/youngs-oks-more-f-22s/</link> <description>Online Defense and Acquisition Journal</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:58:28 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: dino</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/11/12/youngs-oks-more-f-22s/#comment-5087</link> <dc:creator>dino</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 02:43:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=2539#comment-5087</guid> <description>always entertaining and yet disturbing to see the expert opinions of highly-uneducated yet still great Americans who might vote.  Please guys--you don&#039;t see me telling you how to clean up vomit, don&#039;t tell us what the AF needs.  (Do use spell check for pete&#039;s sake)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>always entertaining and yet disturbing to see the expert opinions of highly-uneducated yet still great Americans who might vote.  Please guys–you don’t see me telling you how to clean up vomit, don’t tell us what the AF needs.  (Do use spell check for pete’s sake)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Old Squid</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/11/12/youngs-oks-more-f-22s/#comment-5082</link> <dc:creator>Old Squid</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 20:43:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=2539#comment-5082</guid> <description>OPPOS. Over Priced piece of shit. No one jet does it all, this is not the save all of the US armed forces. It has the same frickin radar as the Super Hornet! ohhhhhh-ahhhhhhhhhh it&#039;s stealth! and has &quot;simulated kill ratio&quot; of 144 to 0. Frickin air farce acts liek a totally seprate entity of the US armed forces, no Marines, Army Navy needed, we are all just idiots, all that is required is the awesome F-22, what a joke. Kil the damn thing and spend the money elsewhere. airborne laser technology is more deadly than any airplane. And do you suppose that a carrier borne aircraft can kill a bogie? no way!? Hornets have been combat proven since Desert storm, are cheaper to pruce and very lethal. I so tired of hearing of the wonderful OPPOS F-22 it makes me wana puke.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OPPOS. Over Priced piece of shit. No one jet does it all, this is not the save all of the US armed forces. It has the same frickin radar as the Super Hornet! ohhhhhh-ahhhhhhhhhh it’s stealth! and has “simulated kill ratio” of 144 to 0. Frickin air farce acts liek a totally seprate entity of the US armed forces, no Marines, Army Navy needed, we are all just idiots, all that is required is the awesome F-22, what a joke. Kil the damn thing and spend the money elsewhere. airborne laser technology is more deadly than any airplane. And do you suppose that a carrier borne aircraft can kill a bogie? no way!? Hornets have been combat proven since Desert storm, are cheaper to pruce and very lethal. I so tired of hearing of the wonderful OPPOS F-22 it makes me wana puke.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: dsueii</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/11/12/youngs-oks-more-f-22s/#comment-4035</link> <dc:creator>dsueii</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:47:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=2539#comment-4035</guid> <description>I&#039;m a little late weighin in but I don&#039;t have to say much. John above got it all right. Your the man John, I&#039;d almost bet I know you.I helped write the first specs for the ATF back in the early 1980&#039;s and have watched the program VERY closely ever since. Too many holes and overall a very disappointing effort no matter how you slice it. Given the current made-public performance numbers things are probably even worse.It&#039;s pretty obvious why this program is still alive....the hillmen and the generals. A wise man told me once that there were only three things in life that I could count on: I&#039;ll pay taxes, I&#039;ll die and the AF will &quot;need&quot; a new fighter.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m a little late weighin in but I don’t have to say much. John above got it all right. Your the man John, I’d almost bet I know you.</p><p>I helped write the first specs for the ATF back in the early 1980’s and have watched the program VERY closely ever since. Too many holes and overall a very disappointing effort no matter how you slice it. Given the current made-public performance numbers things are probably even worse.</p><p>It’s pretty obvious why this program is still alive.…the hillmen and the generals. A wise man told me once that there were only three things in life that I could count on: I’ll pay taxes, I’ll die and the AF will “need” a new fighter.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: anthony bauwens</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/11/12/youngs-oks-more-f-22s/#comment-4011</link> <dc:creator>anthony bauwens</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:17:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=2539#comment-4011</guid> <description>Lets fly !</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets fly !</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Maximus</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/11/12/youngs-oks-more-f-22s/#comment-3707</link> <dc:creator>Maximus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:23:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=2539#comment-3707</guid> <description>Massiveguns, well said.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Massiveguns, well said.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DUMB MARINE</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/11/12/youngs-oks-more-f-22s/#comment-3699</link> <dc:creator>DUMB MARINE</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:12:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=2539#comment-3699</guid> <description>I hope all you spend the last dime in the bank dorks get all the crap you want, In less than ten years this flying fart will be obosleet. But the US taxpayers will still be paying for your wanting to have a better toy. The country is broak, no medical for anywone even the VA sucks. but you get to watch them chop this flying fart, cut into little pices in you lifetime. Get your heads out of the military industrial machine cheeks and take a wake up pill.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope all you spend the last dime in the bank dorks get all the crap you want, In less than ten years this flying fart will be obosleet. But the US taxpayers will still be paying for your wanting to have a better toy. The country is broak, no medical for anywone even the VA sucks. but you get to watch them chop this flying fart, cut into little pices in you lifetime. Get your heads out of the military industrial machine cheeks and take a wake up pill.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/11/12/youngs-oks-more-f-22s/#comment-3646</link> <dc:creator>John</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:04:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=2539#comment-3646</guid> <description>For the record, Mike Wynne could not be more wrong.  The Lockheed proposal for the Advanced procurement priced the 4 + 16 option at exactly the same price as contracting for 20.  Plus, Lockheed made the 16 AP option valid until mid-March.  The decision exactly reflects Secretary Gates intent - and Mike knows it. 20 more F-22&#039;s will cost $3 billion - the next adminstration deserves the chance to decide whether to purchase these airplanes.  The taxpayer should not waste $90 million buying parts for airplanes that may never be built.  The F-22 and F-35 are both 5th generation fighters.  The F-22 has an advantage in certain air-to-air missions.  The F-35 has dramatic advantages in air-to-ground missions and has several capability features that the F-22 does not have.  The Nation will have to spend over $8 billion just to get the F-22&#039;s we have purchased to a full level of capability.  This does not address the poor mission capability rate of F-22, the increasing cost of maintaining F-22, the failure of the F-22 to meet its requirements through operational test, and the extreme complexity and cost of developing future capability upgrades for the F-22&#039;s highly integrated, 1980&#039;s avionics architecture.  No one wants to kill the program, but everyone should analyze this program based on facts and data instead of the logo on their sleeves or their profit motives.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the record, Mike Wynne could not be more wrong.  The Lockheed proposal for the Advanced procurement priced the 4 + 16 option at exactly the same price as contracting for 20.  Plus, Lockheed made the 16 AP option valid until mid-March.  The decision exactly reflects Secretary Gates intent — and Mike knows it.<br /> 20 more F-22’s will cost $3 billion — the next adminstration deserves the chance to decide whether to purchase these airplanes.  The taxpayer should not waste $90 million buying parts for airplanes that may never be built.  The F-22 and F-35 are both 5th generation fighters.  The F-22 has an advantage in certain air-to-air missions.  The F-35 has dramatic advantages in air-to-ground missions and has several capability features that the F-22 does not have.  The Nation will have to spend over $8 billion just to get the F-22’s we have purchased to a full level of capability.  This does not address the poor mission capability rate of F-22, the increasing cost of maintaining F-22, the failure of the F-22 to meet its requirements through operational test, and the extreme complexity and cost of developing future capability upgrades for the F-22’s highly integrated, 1980’s avionics architecture.  No one wants to kill the program, but everyone should analyze this program based on facts and data instead of the logo on their sleeves or their profit motives.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Phil</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/11/12/youngs-oks-more-f-22s/#comment-3569</link> <dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:31:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=2539#comment-3569</guid> <description>&quot;I do like the F-22’s, and I do think we need them to counter forces from CHN and RUS, but it’s unrealistic to have a fleet of them. Upgrade the F-15’s and -16’s with vectored thrust, conformal tanks which increase stealthiness and improve range, and make some awesome weapons to reach out and touch someone.&quot;By the time that you&#039;re finished upgrading an F-15 or F-16 with all of the latest electronics and avionics and redesigning the airframe to be stealthy you&#039;ll have ended up with an F-22 and F-35 and wasted a lot of time and money in the process. You have to understand that the F-15 &amp; F-16 are old, they were designed back in the late 60&#039;s/early 70&#039;s and there&#039;s only so much that you can do with a 30 some odd year old design. Sure they can be upgraded to be a little better than they currently are but they&#039;d still wouldn&#039;t nearly as good as an F-22 or F-35 and would still end up being outclassed by every other next generation aircraft being fielded like the many SU-30 variants. We don&#039;t want a fighter that&#039;s only nearly as good or just as good as any other fighter out there, we want to better; much, much better.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“I do like the F-22’s, and I do think we need them to counter forces from CHN and RUS, but it’s unrealistic to have a fleet of them. Upgrade the F-15’s and –16’s with vectored thrust, conformal tanks which increase stealthiness and improve range, and make some awesome weapons to reach out and touch someone.”</p><p>By the time that you’re finished upgrading an F-15 or F-16 with all of the latest electronics and avionics and redesigning the airframe to be stealthy you’ll have ended up with an F-22 and F-35 and wasted a lot of time and money in the process. You have to understand that the F-15 &amp; F-16 are old, they were designed back in the late 60’s/early 70’s and there’s only so much that you can do with a 30 some odd year old design. Sure they can be upgraded to be a little better than they currently are but they’d still wouldn’t nearly as good as an F-22 or F-35 and would still end up being outclassed by every other next generation aircraft being fielded like the many SU-30 variants. We don’t want a fighter that’s only nearly as good or just as good as any other fighter out there, we want to better; much, much better.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: massiveguns</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/11/12/youngs-oks-more-f-22s/#comment-3526</link> <dc:creator>massiveguns</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 23:19:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=2539#comment-3526</guid> <description>I enjoy the obvious critical thinking process behind the comments for and against the Raptor...and also about other weapons systems and military processes that need refurbishment.However, when it comes to the political aspects of what some are posting...reading that nonsense is enough to pull what little hair I have left right out of my cranium.There are those that continue to castigate President Elect Obama as if he is the Anti-Christ.  The man is going to be the President...how insipid is he supposed to be?  There is not one President alive or dead that managed to fulfill every single ideal or issue he thought was important or mentioned as part of his platform while running for election.Not only that, but most politicians if not all usually experience a &quot;coming of age&quot; so to speak after taking office. They usually find that a lot of the rhetoric they were forced to spew has nothing to do with real life or the management and direction of a nation as great ours.I just cannot believe the level of ignorance and fear demonstrated by individuals who feel as if this nation is threatened from within because a man named Obama is getting ready to take office.  I&#039;m not an Obama supporter but so far he&#039;s not managed to sexually harrass a female worker, so far he&#039;s not managed to create a hostile environment between the military, secret service, and the presidential staff.  So far he has not managed to strip the military structure so far down to the bone that when a miltary conflict occurred troops did not have the proper equipment.  So far he has not selected a command staff that when questioned by junior NCO&#039;s about why they did not have the proper equipment the answer was &quot;what would you rather go to war with, equipment you&#039;d like to have or what you already have?&quot; (Paraphrase).We (this country) needs to stop urinating and crying about Obama and start working on our elected officials and begin pressuring them to get out country ready for the next major conflict.Here&#039;s some ideas: Reset our military and replace our depleted/ damaged equipment levels to include replacing all forward deployed non-used but stressed items.Continue the development and use of land and space based ISR technologyUnderstand the economics of the drug trade and how and why it&#039;s destabilizing our southern bordersStrengthen our critical infrastructure (railways, tunnels, shipping, electricity, roadways).  We&#039;ve already seen what natural disasters can do.  The damage may not be preventable but the response can always be better and different.  If this nation cannot respond correctly to a natural disaster what are we going to do when the next terrorist attack comes?Begin training the everyday citizen to understand the biggest and least expensive sensor that can be employed to detect anomolous activity is in fact the citizen.People need to wake-up and stop the &quot;sheep centered&quot; group think.  The best armed soldier in the world is a smart, non-biased, intelligent and well informed American...wake-up, be informed, and learn about what&#039;s going on around you.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoy the obvious critical thinking process behind the comments for and against the Raptor…and also about other weapons systems and military processes that need refurbishment.</p><p>However, when it comes to the political aspects of what some are posting…reading that nonsense is enough to pull what little hair I have left right out of my cranium.</p><p>There are those that continue to castigate President Elect Obama as if he is the Anti-Christ.  The man is going to be the President…how insipid is he supposed to be?  There is not one President alive or dead that managed to fulfill every single ideal or issue he thought was important or mentioned as part of his platform while running for election.</p><p>Not only that, but most politicians if not all usually experience a “coming of age” so to speak after taking office. They usually find that a lot of the rhetoric they were forced to spew has nothing to do with real life or the management and direction of a nation as great ours.</p><p>I just cannot believe the level of ignorance and fear demonstrated by individuals who feel as if this nation is threatened from within because a man named Obama is getting ready to take office.  I’m not an Obama supporter but so far he’s not managed to sexually harrass a female worker, so far he’s not managed to create a hostile environment between the military, secret service, and the presidential staff.  So far he has not managed to strip the military structure so far down to the bone that when a miltary conflict occurred troops did not have the proper equipment.  So far he has not selected a command staff that when questioned by junior NCO’s about why they did not have the proper equipment the answer was “what would you rather go to war with, equipment you’d like to have or what you already have?” (Paraphrase).</p><p>We (this country) needs to stop urinating and crying about Obama and start working on our elected officials and begin pressuring them to get out country ready for the next major conflict.</p><p>Here’s some ideas:<br /> Reset our military and replace our depleted/ damaged equipment levels to include replacing all forward deployed non-used but stressed items.</p><p>Continue the development and use of land and space based ISR technology</p><p>Understand the economics of the drug trade and how and why it’s destabilizing our southern borders</p><p>Strengthen our critical infrastructure (railways, tunnels, shipping, electricity, roadways).  We’ve already seen what natural disasters can do.  The damage may not be preventable but the response can always be better and different.  If this nation cannot respond correctly to a natural disaster what are we going to do when the next terrorist attack comes?</p><p>Begin training the everyday citizen to understand the biggest and least expensive sensor that can be employed to detect anomolous<br /> activity is in fact the citizen.</p><p>People need to wake-up and stop the “sheep centered” group think.  The best armed soldier in the world is a smart, non-biased, intelligent and well informed American…wake-up, be informed, and learn about what’s going on around you.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Robert</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/11/12/youngs-oks-more-f-22s/#comment-3515</link> <dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 18:26:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=2539#comment-3515</guid> <description>I agree with Steve. Expand that view across the board. For the P-8, we are using converted airliners. We could modify other aircraft to conduct supply, refueling, long-range loiter, etc. Picture a 747 as a mobile missile platform say as an extension of THAAD or heavy lift. different tires, different engines, but same overall purpose. Deliver product where it needs to be.I do like the F-22&#039;s, and I do think we need them to counter forces from CHN and RUS, but it&#039;s unrealistic to have a fleet of them. Upgrade the F-15&#039;s and -16&#039;s with vectored thrust, conformal tanks which increase stealthiness and improve range, and make some awesome weapons to reach out and touch someone.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Steve. Expand that view across the board. For the P-8, we are using converted airliners. We could modify other aircraft to conduct supply, refueling, long-range loiter, etc. Picture a 747 as a mobile missile platform say as an extension of THAAD or heavy lift. different tires, different engines, but same overall purpose. Deliver product where it needs to be.</p><p>I do like the F-22’s, and I do think we need them to counter forces from CHN and RUS, but it’s unrealistic to have a fleet of them. Upgrade the F-15’s and –16’s with vectored thrust, conformal tanks which increase stealthiness and improve range, and make some awesome weapons to reach out and touch someone.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: pfcem</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/11/12/youngs-oks-more-f-22s/#comment-3497</link> <dc:creator>pfcem</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 05:41:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=2539#comment-3497</guid> <description>Steve,Thanks GOD you are not making ANY decisions concerning our military.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p><p>Thanks GOD you are not making ANY decisions concerning our military.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Steve</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/11/12/youngs-oks-more-f-22s/#comment-3483</link> <dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 19:49:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=2539#comment-3483</guid> <description>Only one poster nailed the purpose of the F-22.  It is a weapon platform.Given improved weapons, any of our existing weapon platforms can carry the battle to the enemy.  Keeping the F-15 or F-16 lines open would have been a much better solution.  New weapon platforms based on proven technology carrying the world&#039;s best weapons is the only way to go--unless you need to provide R&amp;D jobs.  An even worse reason to argue for bleeding edge &quot;fighters&quot;:  if you happen to be a retired military officer with your hand in the tax payer&#039;s cookie jar--you&#039;d have a reason to back the F-22, F-35, and other future weapon platforms.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only one poster nailed the purpose of the F-22.  It is a weapon platform.</p><p>Given improved weapons, any of our existing weapon platforms can carry the battle to the enemy.  Keeping the F-15 or F-16 lines open would have been a much better solution.  New weapon platforms based on proven technology carrying the world’s best weapons is the only way to go–unless you need to provide R&amp;D jobs.  An even worse reason to argue for bleeding edge “fighters”:  if you happen to be a retired military officer with your hand in the tax payer’s cookie jar–you’d have a reason to back the F-22, F-35, and other future weapon platforms.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Stephen</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/11/12/youngs-oks-more-f-22s/#comment-3457</link> <dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 01:23:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=2539#comment-3457</guid> <description>Senator McCain would have been the answer but, the majority of American people have spoken… heaven help us all!Heaven did help you all. Palin said it&#039;s in god&#039;s hands and god has decided. Get over it.XXXXXYeah, right. The man that was against the new GI bill. The one that ensures that wounded soldiers can get the care they should be getting w/o a lot of b/s on the side. Not to mention improved opportunities in education and trades that previous generations of vets got. While he and Bush were against this bill, when Bush had to sign it, he tried to give McCain credit for it knowing full well that McCain was against it too.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senator McCain would have been the answer but, the majority of American people have spoken… heaven help us all!</p><p>Heaven did help you all. Palin said it’s in god’s hands and god has decided. Get over it.</p><p>XXXXX</p><p>Yeah, right. The man that was against the new GI bill. The one that ensures that wounded soldiers can get the care they should be getting w/o a lot of b/s on the side. Not to mention improved opportunities in education and trades that previous generations of vets got.<br /> While he and Bush were against this bill, when Bush had to sign it, he tried to give McCain credit for it knowing full well that McCain was against it too.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tracy</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/11/12/youngs-oks-more-f-22s/#comment-3446</link> <dc:creator>Tracy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 15:02:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=2539#comment-3446</guid> <description>We want whatever it takes to keep our military strong and our service members with the best support ever!Senator McCain would have been the answer but, the majority of American people have spoken... heaven help us all!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We want whatever it takes to keep our military strong and our service members with the best support ever!</p><p>Senator McCain would have been the answer but, the majority of American people have spoken… heaven help us all!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rhyno2-327</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/11/12/youngs-oks-more-f-22s/#comment-3445</link> <dc:creator>Rhyno2-327</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 14:54:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=2539#comment-3445</guid> <description>Air supremacy is the key to winning a battle on the ground. A rather large battle. Wat have we been doing lately? Obama is NOT gonna strip the military, and Gates wants $ to fight THIS war. More UAV&#039;s, Reapers, all the way down to the sqaud level. Knowing wats on the other side of that ridge is wat I wanna know. 183 for now, and lets see wat develops. Don&#039;t believe all the hype about the Su-27 etcetera, etcetera...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Air supremacy is the key to winning a battle on the ground. A rather large battle. Wat have we been doing lately? Obama is NOT gonna strip the military, and Gates wants $ to fight THIS war. More UAV’s, Reapers, all the way down to the sqaud level. Knowing wats on the other side of that ridge is wat I wanna know. 183 for now, and lets see wat develops. Don’t believe all the hype about the Su-27 etcetera, etcetera…</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: pvtrick</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/11/12/youngs-oks-more-f-22s/#comment-3426</link> <dc:creator>pvtrick</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 19:38:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=2539#comment-3426</guid> <description>I spose that if you can SEE a f-22 . you know how it works and how good it is..</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spose that if you can SEE a f-22 . you know how it works and how good it is..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: F101 VOODOO Crew Chief</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/11/12/youngs-oks-more-f-22s/#comment-3407</link> <dc:creator>F101 VOODOO Crew Chief</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:25:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=2539#comment-3407</guid> <description>General Dynamics, OOPS Lockheed Martin develop a fine weapons platform. I think we all realize that the state of our ecconomy dictates the number of fighter jets we can afford to fabricate.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>General Dynamics, OOPS Lockheed Martin develop a fine weapons platform. I think we all realize that the state of our ecconomy dictates the number of fighter jets we can afford to fabricate.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DANIEL OSEI AM[PADU</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/11/12/youngs-oks-more-f-22s/#comment-3402</link> <dc:creator>DANIEL OSEI AM[PADU</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 11:59:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=2539#comment-3402</guid> <description>You guys are doing great! Keep up with the good work.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys are doing great!<br /> Keep up with the good work.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Stephen</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/11/12/youngs-oks-more-f-22s/#comment-3398</link> <dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 05:18:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=2539#comment-3398</guid> <description>&quot;Mr. Obama will kill the F-22 and the F-35, along with all new military weapon systems. He is a pacifist. He believes he can talk to our enemies and beg them not to hurt us. He has said that even if attacked with nuclear weapons, it would be wrong to respond in kind&quot; xxx These comments show an ignorance Rush would be proud of. The sheer stupidity is astounding.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Mr. Obama will kill the F-22 and the F-35, along with all new military weapon systems. He is a pacifist. He believes he can talk to our enemies and beg them not to hurt us. He has said that even if attacked with nuclear weapons, it would be wrong to respond in kind“<br /> xxx<br /> These comments show an ignorance Rush would be proud of. The sheer stupidity is astounding.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Stephen</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/11/12/youngs-oks-more-f-22s/#comment-3397</link> <dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 05:15:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=2539#comment-3397</guid> <description>&quot;We don’t want to end up like the Brits in the Falklands with Harriers Fighting off Mirage fighters.&quot; xxx SeaHarriers shot down 21 Argentine aircraft in combat for ZERO losses. WTH is wrong with that?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“We don’t want to end up like the Brits in the Falklands with Harriers Fighting off Mirage fighters.“<br /> xxx<br /> SeaHarriers shot down 21 Argentine aircraft in combat for ZERO losses.<br /> WTH is wrong with that?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.006 seconds using apc
Object Caching 816/817 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.dodbuzz.com

Served from: dodbuzz.com @ 2012-02-09 01:11:49 -->
