<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: A Brown Water Navy?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/11/14/a-brown-water-navy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/11/14/a-brown-water-navy/</link> <description>Online Defense and Acquisition Journal</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:07:57 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: badmac</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/11/14/a-brown-water-navy/comment-page-1/#comment-16513</link> <dc:creator>badmac</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:49:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=2579#comment-16513</guid> <description>Also a Brownwater vet, Sea Float/Sea Anchor, this article is meant to confuse people.  The new LCS&#039; cannot be considered a part of the Brownwater Navy. They are much too large to penetrate desolate waterways. Perhaps the closest craft I can think of was our ATCs/Monitors. And they were about 60 feet long and around 18 or 20 feet wide. At least they were able to traverse some pretty narrow rivers and canals. And carry troops and had kick-azz firepower! This Tri-Model fleet idea is not going to work unless all conditions are perfect. And I haven&#039;t seen that yet.
I&#039;m all for improved small littoral craft, even though our current inventory of small combat craft looks impressing. I suppose all this difference of opinion comes down to one&#039;s definition of &quot;littoral&quot;. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also a Brownwater vet, Sea Float/Sea Anchor, this article is meant to confuse people.  The new LCS’ cannot be considered a part of the Brownwater Navy. They are much too large to penetrate desolate waterways. Perhaps the closest craft I can think of was our ATCs/Monitors. And they were about 60 feet long and around 18 or 20 feet wide. At least they were able to traverse some pretty narrow rivers and canals. And carry troops and had kick-azz firepower! This Tri-Model fleet idea is not going to work unless all conditions are perfect. And I haven’t seen that yet.</p><p>I’m all for improved small littoral craft, even though our current inventory of small combat craft looks impressing. I suppose all this difference of opinion comes down to one’s definition of “littoral”.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: leesea</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2008/11/14/a-brown-water-navy/comment-page-1/#comment-3514</link> <dc:creator>leesea</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:34:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=2579#comment-3514</guid> <description>As a Brownwater Navy vet I say: let&#039;s get the name of this article corrected to read &quot;greenwater&quot;.  That is where littoral warfare, GFS and Offshore Parternering will happen NOT up the rivers, bays and lakes.  Brownwater ops are different and not well funded.The Navy should be tri-modal to operate in all three environments</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Brownwater Navy vet I say: let’s get the name of this article corrected to read “greenwater”.  That is where littoral warfare, GFS and Offshore Parternering will happen NOT up the rivers, bays and lakes.  Brownwater ops are different and not well funded.</p><p>The Navy should be tri-modal to operate in all three environments</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 10/21 queries in 0.011 seconds using apc

Served from: cloud-milcom-web1.hspheredns.com @ 2010-03-11 23:50:31 -->