CIA Scandal Erupts

CIA Scandal Erupts

It must be the worst nightmare of every CIA director — the agency ignores its own rules and regulations and kills innocent Americans, and then the people in charge of the operation lie to Congress and cover up what happened.

The nightmare has apparently come to life and it became public today when Rep. Pete Hoekstra (R-Mich.) announced that a report by the CIA’s own inspector general found that agency officers apparently ignored standing rules and regulations governing when they could shoot at aircraft in the drug war in Latin America. The lapses led to the death of at least 10 innocent civilians, Hoekstra said, including two Americans, Veronica “Roni” Bowers and her daughter, Charity, in April 2001. They were missionaries in Peru heading home when the CIA ordered a Peruvian Air Force jet to shoot down their plane. The shoot down was part of a joint U.S.-Peruvian anti-drug program that began in the mid-1990s. CIA officers worked with Peruvian pilots to spot planes believed to be carrying illegal drugs.

“It is a blot, a dark stain, a sad day for CIA,” Hoekstra told reporters this morning. “The CIA knew about repeated serious issues with this program, but took no corrective actions, which could have prevented this needless tragedy. Making matters worse, the inspector general found continuous efforts to cover the matter up and potentially block criminal investigation.”


While Hoekstra has taken a keen interest in the case from the beginning, since both victims were from Michigan, he clearly sees the case as having much wider significance than a single tragic event.

“This issue goes to the heart of the American people’s ability to trust the CIA,” said Hoekstra, the senior Republican on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. “Americans deserve to know that agencies given the power to operate on their behalf aren’t abusing that power or their trust.”

Hoekstra based his harsh criticisms on findings in a voluminous and classified report by the agency’s inspector general: “Procedures Used in the Narcotics Airbridge Denial Program in Peru, 1995–2001.” The report was completed late this summer and Hoekstra’s committee received its copy around the time that Congress recessed for the elections, the first week of October, he said.

In an Oct. 6 letter to CIA Director Mike Hayden, Hoekstra cited “repeated failures to follow procedures that resulted in loss of life; false or misleading statements to Congress by CIA officials, up to and including former Director George Tenet; and potential obstruction of justice by CIA officials with respect to a Department of Justice criminal investigation.”

A former senior CIA officer familiar with the anti-drug program was skeptical of Hoekstra’s conclusions. “The Airbridge Denial Program was ruthlessly successful for years, stopping Peruvian cocaine base from the Upper Huallaga Valley up into Colombia from being refined. When the two Americans were shot down in their private plane, my understanding was it was a clear error, committed by the Peruvian pilots. They did not follow all the procedures,” the retired official said. “To say the agency was ‘responsible’ is a stretch. The procedures were written by us and overseen by us, so I guess to that extent the agency was responsible.”

Hoekstra told reporters he will press for extended hearings by the intelligence committee, headed by Rep. Silvestre Reyes (D-Texas). The Republican lawmaker also wants the Justice Department to take a close look at whether it needs to reopen the criminal investigation into the case. No one was charged as a result of an earlier investigation and Hoekstra made it clear he thinks the Justice Department may not have had access to all the relevant facts when it first investigated the case.

I asked Hoekstra if he believed there are still fundamental problems with the CIA’s culture today and if he believed the Director of National Intelligence — which did not exist at the time of the shootdown — had made improvements to CIA and the intelligence community’s culture. “I think the DNI is doing everything he can to strengthen his relationship with Congress,” he said.

In addition to his press conference, Hoekstra wrote a letter today to the CIA Inspector General, John Helgerson, asking him to declassify as much of his report as possible. In a clear shot across the CIA’s bow, Hoekstra reminded Helgerson that information must not be classified to “conceal violations of law, inefficiency, or administrative error” or to “prevent embarrassment to a person, organization or agency…”

Hoekstra ended his letter to Hayden with a clear warning, and a promise: “I will not let this matter rest.”

Join the Conversation

Bad headline. It didn’t ‘erupt.’ Hoekstra has dredged it up for some political reason. He has gone out of his way to criticize the CIA for years. I saw little in your report that did not come out at the time.

Here’s the initial report LINK. Such reports are always fragmentary and subject to change as more details emerge. Here’s another after more details came out LINK.

Much ado that will do nothing to help those killed.

Great website, the information is good, and the content will keep me coming back, thanks again.

Well nothing to be shock on this i think most of CIA info is fake from other people who try to blame the agency of CIA.
cause as i am analist i know fake people from difrent company’s at the wold they cheating as cooperating with CIA but this is not true.…

Tupac lives! My team has something to offer…
Relaeted or Unrelated? You decide!

Shining Path, Tupac Amaru (Peru, leftists)
Author: Kathryn Gregory

Updated: September 25, 2008

Introduction
Origins of Terrorism in Peru
Strategies
U.S. Policy
Buying and Selling Power in Peru (A Narco-Alliance)
Decline of Shining Path
Resurgence of Shining Path

——————————————————————————–

Introduction
The two main Peruvian rebel groups, both leftist, are the Maoist group Shining Path (Sendero Luminoso) and the Cuban-inspired Tupac Amaru Revolutionary Movement (Movimiento Revolucionario Tupac Amaru). Both organizations operated most forcefully in the 1980s and early 1990s, when Peru’s government fought a costly war against both insurgencies, but disproportionately the Shining Path. The U.S. State Department identifies Shining Path as a terrorist organization, but Tupac Amaru hasn’t been listed as such since 1999. Shining Path had a period of dormancy in the 1990s, but Peruvian government reports say it has now revived somewhat in the mountainous regions of Peru.

Origins of Terrorism in Peru
The Shining Path began in the late 1960s as a small communist revolutionary group led by a philosophy professor named Abimael Guzmán. Guzmán opposed Peru’s prevailing political elites. His followers drew on Marxism and the example of Cuba’s Fidel Castro, and coalesced into a significant and violent guerrilla army which regularly used terrorist tactics in their effort to destabilize and overthrow the Peruvian government. At the height of its power, Shining Path’s ranks numbered around ten thousand, according to a report from the Jamestown Foundation. A paper from the Council on Hemispheric Affairs (COHA) says the main goal of Shining Path has always been to overthrow the existing Peruvian government and political institutions and replace them with a communist revolutionary command. Guzmán, adopting the nom de guerre Presidente Gonzalo, attempted to do all of this while resisting overt ties with foreign powers or other Latin American leftist groups, including the contemporary Peruvian group known as the Tupac Amaru Revolutionary Movement.

Tupac Amaru, or MRTA, was named for an eighteenth-century rebel leader who fought Spanish colonial control. The group, which is Marxist, was founded to rid Peru of all imperialist elements and supported many of the communist principles that led to the Cuban revolution. It took up arms in 1984 and operated mainly in rural areas. According to the book “Peru’s MRTA: Tupac Amaru Revolutionary Movement,” which examines the group’s philosophy and tactics, the MRTA’s primary goal was to reform the Peruvian government and create a society in which ownership of property was shared and everyone enjoyed similar levels of prosperity. MRTA members decided the best way to fight the war was to attack the holdings of Peru’s wealthy elite, but sought to cause the least amount of injuries possible by frequently warning of its attacks in advance. Experts say Tupac Amaru has been less violent, in general, than Shining Path.

In December 1996, during the rule of Peruvian President Alberto Fujimori, fourteen MRTA members occupied the Japanese Ambassador’s residence in Lima, holding 72 hostages for over four months. Fujimori ordered armed forces to raid the residence in April 1997, rescuing all but one of the remaining hostages and killing all fourteen MRTA militants, including the remaining leaders of the terrorist organization. Shortly after this uprising, MRTA’s powers and operations within Peru scaled back dramatically.

Strategies
Shining Path’s strategy, according to the COHA paper, was to use violence to bring down Peru’s democratic government, disrupt the economy, destroy the state’s reputation among the peasantry and, ultimately, ruin its reputation among the population in general. A New York Times report looking at rebuilding efforts in the aftermath of Shining Path violence says the group often hacked its victims to death with machetes to save ammunition. The Peruvian government-sponsored Truth and Reconciliation Commission issued a report (PDF) in 2004 saying that the group’s human rights violations evolved into “generalized and systemic practice.” Guzmán’s capture and imprisonment in 1992 derailed the Shining Path’s momentum, and remnants of the group now operate mainly in remote jungle areas. Shining Path is not sponsored by any state and has no known links to other terrorist groups. It considers itself the only remaining true communist revolutionary movement.

Initially, Shining Path targeted local authorities, such as mayors, mid-level bureaucrats, police, and local political leaders. Since 1983, however, the group has gradually expanded its target list to include wealthy locals and state agency heads. The Truth and Reconciliation Commission report says that Shining Path attacks killed as many as 11,000 civilians, though it estimates as many as 70,000 people were killed overall in fighting between the Peruvian government and the Shining Path. According to an article in the Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs,the campaign cost the Peruvian government over $10 billion.

U.S. Policy
During the 1970s and 1980s, Washington pursued a policy of lending money and giving military aid to Peru to help the country’s government wage war against Shining Path. This policy continued even after President Alan Garcia’s administration defaulted on some of its loans, despite a longstanding U.S. policy making a country ineligible for aid if it failed to repay military assistance debt for more than a year. In February 1990, the United States and several Andean countries, including Peru, signed the Cartagena Agreement (PDF), a pact aimed at expanding economic and military assistance to help bolster both counternarcotics and counterinsurgency efforts. The assistance program was approved in 1992 as part of a $30-million counternarcotics package of aid, but was suspended in April 1992 under President Fujimori. The Americas Watch Committee, a U.S. based non-governmental organization that conducts research and advocacy on human rights and is part of Human Rights Watch, issued a report in 1991 that urged the United States to stop sending military aid to Peru until they reformed their standards of human rights, including abusive treatment of detainees, intimidation of media and human rights groups, and an orchestrated campaign of political assassinations. The report worried that “U.S. aid would be used to facilitate murders, abductions, or torture.”

Buying and Selling Power in Peru (A Narco-Alliance)
Similar to other revolutionary uprisings, Shining Path funded many of its operations through narcotrafficking and forced taxes on small business and individuals in the areas they predominately operated within. At its height, Sendero financed itself mainly through drug-trafficking taxes. In return, it insured peasant growers fair prices for coca crops and provided them shelter from violence from traffickers and security forces. Today, the U.S. State Department says that Shining Path is attempting to reestablish a financial relationship (Reuters) with Peru’s coca growers. As military offensives in Colombia have taken a toll on the operations of the FARC guerilla movement, coca production has in many cases shifted to Peru. It is unknown how much money Shining Path has today to support itself.

Decline of Shining Path
On April 5, 1992, President Alberto Fujimori’s administration staged a coup that led to the dissolution of Peru’s Congress and the dismantling of the country’s legal system. After the coup, Fujimori took over the country’s media organizations and almost all its other free institutions, promising that a return to democracy would occur within the year. The accumulation of near absolute power in the hands of the president and his coterie precipitated a campaign of murder and abduction against those thought to be enemies of the state, without having any legal system capable of challenging them. Under these new laws, Lima’s security forces are thought to have vastly increased a campaign of violence against Peruvians thought to be sympathetic to, or part of, Shining Path. The United States was alarmed at the turn of events and withdrew all government aid other than humanitarian assistance, but didn’t permanently sever ties with Peru.

On September 12, 1992, Abimael Guzmán, the head of Shining Path, was captured and imprisoned, destroying the group’s chain of command. After this, the insurgency quieted down and assassinations and attacks decreased. A few years after his capture, Guzmán called for a peace deal, which caused the remaining insurgents to split into two groups-one that insisted on continuing to fight and another that wanted to put down its weapons.

Resurgence of Shining Path
Recent information suggests that Shining Path has staged a moderate resurgence in the mountainous regions of Peru. Some Peruvian officials suspect that the remnants of the Maoist Shining Path have turned to cocaine production to fund their operations, which includes their campaign to overthrow the Peruvian government. The U.S Department of State continues to classify Shining Path as a terrorist organization in its most recent Country Reports on Terrorism. “This makes Sendero Luminoso a multi-edged weapon aimed at not only Peruvian national security, but that of Latin America and the United States as well,” writes Frank Hyland, CEO of S&F Enterprises and a man who has been involved with counterterrorism for over twenty-five years. “Without even pulling a trigger, Sendero Luminoso continues to contribute to the multi-billion dollar annual drain on the U.S. economy,” he writes.

The reformed Shining Path has managed to inflict minor damage on Peru’s military and police force. In December 2006, Shining Path killed five Peruvian police officers and two workers from the National Coca Company. Shining Path has easily gained ground in the country due to indifference or outright apathy on the part of the peasantry, writes Hyland.

Currently the head of the rebel group, known as Comrade Artemio, is the only high-profile Shining Path leader who has not been caught or killed. On March 25, 2008, Shining Path members working with drug traffickers killed a police officer and wounded eleven on an anti-drug patrol. The unit is said to have been lead by Comrade Artemio. Artemio has stated that even though the Shining Path hasn’t been very active since the 1992 capture of Guzmán, who received a life sentence in October 2006, they are rising again and intend to grow and work in secrecy.

Christians in Action firing on Christians in Action? Why not Bible thump on the ground? My cynicism comes from the link by Ken White. Either an accident or a Murphy..or nothing at all.

Currently seeing the wild action in Mumbai from real terrorist cum..seem since ya’ll got this news on the 21st and today is the 27th I’ve missed a week somewhere.

No surprise here. The Agency’s a rogue organization and has been since the early ‘60s.

There is the perception by both detractors and supporters that the CIA is a sleek and highly efficient organization –for better or worse. The reality is that the CIA is often a mass of bureaucracy like many other government agencies. For instance the time a CIA supervisor choked a subordinate and as a result they promoted the supervisor. Yes, that and other incidents like it have happened.

“I will not let this matter rest.” Hoekstra. Of course not. He’s found something to do when he’s not joining his comrades to bankrupt the country with “discretionary” spending. Congressman, turn your attention to the critical issues President-Elect Obama and the Congress face now. In other words, quit stomping on ants while the elephants are running through the rose bushes.

CIA don’t hired ex military personel ; situation like that happens with a bunch of colleges boys without experiences.

Does this newly reported event seem to smack John Foster Berlet?

“CIA don’t hire ex-military”??of course they do and have been for mucho years…as for missionaries in harms way — be invisible!

..as to the” CIA not hiring ex-military”..of course they do and have been for mucho years!! As for missionaries, better be invisible if you insist on being in harms way

Sir, For the greater good, a small loss is considered (to me) acceptable. If you can’t take a bloody nose, you shouldn’t be in the game!

The missionaries, like all true missionaries know the risk of the foriegn field they endeavor to reach for the glory of the Lord Jesus Christ. Our loss is their gain in glory with the Lord, and they earned it in earnest, surely to receive the martyrs crown from the Lord. The issue is we are killing our own and hiding it, lying about it. Have we become the evil we claim to be against… I’d like to hear more about the CIA plane that ran out of fuel over Mexico being denied the usual pit stop for fuel. It alledgedly crash on the way to America and x tons of cocaine was on board…

Acceptable Losses?

I hope you, your wife, and/or children are next.

Line the CIA agents up against the wall and shoot them.

I mean, since you obviously censor comments expressing more than a token degree of anger over cavalier people who consider the murder of American citizens as dismissable “acceptable losses”, why not just go whole hog and say that the people who kill innocent americans should be shot down like dogs .… no matter who they work for.

Has no one been punished even after so many years later? This is disgusting. We can’t let the government control everything. More people need to be pissed off.

when youve got a job to do your going to have casualties i should no ive got a body count of 300,000 plus just do it and follow orders to your best catfish

And people wonder WHY Americans don’t trust our own government agencies! I don’t even trust them enough to put my real name on this,obviously many others don’t either. If an agency can’t even follow the rules and regulations that it’s own wrote, how can they be expected to follow anything? They are above the law. I am thankful for the missionaries who take the risk to go to foreign lands to spread the word of our Lord Jesus Christ knowing that they don’t just have to look out for the foreign government trying to kill them, their own government may do the same as in this case.

And people wonder WHY Americans don’t trust our own government agencies! I don’t even trust them enough to put my real name on this,
xxxx

lmao…

don’t you know just sending this message gave away the location and account number of your computer? cmthu

I JUST FOLLOW ORDERS ILL PULL THE PLUG AND STILL GET THE JOB DONE THE PROFESSIONAL

People, if you really think that the CIA, FBI, Military branches and our Government do EVERYTHING CORRECT, you gotta wake up and smell the coffee. I spend 10 years flying our nations leaders around the world and I know for a fact, that, a whole lot of them, are not abiding by the laws, rules and regulations that are set for them to follow. This CIA incident is nothing new. Its been going on for years and its time that it comes out.

The overview is much different with boots to the ground in all decision making regarding Military action where life is concerned.

The war on Narcotics is exactly that, a war and more often than not today, the FARC and other organizations are formally equipped and our units are outnumbered, but given a prime directive. The decision making surrounding the prime directive has protocol and throughout history the protocol is a guide, not an absolute. Much as Bible verse is used. Its a guide.

Unfortunately, the Politics of the situation circumvents the actuality of the gains.

How many lives have been saved from drugs not reaching their destination?

All wars have acceptable overall colleratial damage and humans make mistakes.

Collateral damage is really sad, truly a sad thing, Veronica!

But Dang!

You got zips in the wire and so you bring your daughter down to see the show?

Casualties of war are very sad and unfortunite. But like all wars there are casualties. Including drug wars and Shawdow wars. Deep down we all know that it takes a few deaths to save many. Nobody has found a blood less way to save the world.

*required

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement