<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Lynn Opposed By Four Groups</title> <atom:link href="http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/01/23/lynn-opposed-by-four-groups/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/01/23/lynn-opposed-by-four-groups/</link> <description>Online Defense and Acquisition Journal</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:49:43 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Hitch Hiker</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/01/23/lynn-opposed-by-four-groups/#comment-4948</link> <dc:creator>Hitch Hiker</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:39:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=3913#comment-4948</guid> <description>There are so many hidden foxes in DoD procurement program hen houses that worrying about Lynn is stomping on ants while the elephants are running through the rose bushes. The difference is that Lynn will be operating out in the open under intense scrutiny from the DoD Secretary, Congress and the President not to mention the press corps. Why not assume he has the skills and integrity necessary to do the job or he wouldn&#039;t have been nominated?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are so many hidden foxes in DoD procurement program hen houses that worrying about Lynn is stomping on ants while the elephants are running through the rose bushes. The difference is that Lynn will be operating out in the open under intense scrutiny from the DoD Secretary, Congress and the President not to mention the press corps. Why not assume he has the skills and integrity necessary to do the job or he wouldn’t have been nominated?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: RICHARD DIEFENBACH</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/01/23/lynn-opposed-by-four-groups/#comment-4919</link> <dc:creator>RICHARD DIEFENBACH</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 15:27:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=3913#comment-4919</guid> <description>NO PROBLEM THE CHOSEN ONE HAS GRANTED A WAIVER.  NO WORRIES, DON&#039;T PAY YOUR TAXES BECOME SEC OF TREASURY IN CHARGE OF IRS.  A DEFENSE LOBBIST BECOME 2ND IN CHARGE OF DEFENSE DEPARTMENT WHERE YOU WILL HAVE A SAY IN WHERE TO LET CONTRACTS. STATE DEPT BEING IN CHARGE OF INSURING BILL CLINTONS CHARATIES STAY ABOVE BOARD WHEN IT IS WELL KNOW THAT IF YOU CROSS HILLARY YOU LOSE YOUR JOB. WHAT IS THE OLD SAYING THE FOX GUARDING THE HEN HOUSE. I GUESS THE CHANGE WE SAY IS THE FEW JOBS THAT PRESIDENT OBAMA COULDN&#039;T FIND CLINTON RETREADS TO HEAD.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NO PROBLEM THE CHOSEN ONE HAS GRANTED A WAIVER.  NO WORRIES, DON’T PAY YOUR TAXES BECOME SEC OF TREASURY IN CHARGE OF IRS.  A DEFENSE LOBBIST BECOME 2ND IN CHARGE OF DEFENSE DEPARTMENT WHERE YOU WILL HAVE A SAY IN WHERE TO LET CONTRACTS. STATE DEPT BEING IN CHARGE OF INSURING BILL CLINTONS CHARATIES STAY ABOVE BOARD WHEN IT IS WELL KNOW THAT IF YOU CROSS HILLARY YOU LOSE YOUR JOB. WHAT IS THE OLD SAYING THE FOX GUARDING THE HEN HOUSE. I GUESS THE CHANGE WE SAY IS THE FEW JOBS THAT PRESIDENT OBAMA COULDN’T FIND CLINTON RETREADS TO HEAD.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John Sandoval Jr.</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/01/23/lynn-opposed-by-four-groups/#comment-4918</link> <dc:creator>John Sandoval Jr.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 06:42:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=3913#comment-4918</guid> <description>What is the problem? Lynn has been a lobbyist within the last two years. Is it so hard to understand that he is not eligible in light of the legislation prohibited from serving? Many things may be brought up to justify his appointment. But it can not change that he was a lobbyist for a defense contractor. Why have a law that needs to be explained? Blackcoat</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the problem? Lynn has been a lobbyist within the last two years. Is it so hard to understand that he is not eligible in light of the legislation prohibited from serving? Many things may be brought up to justify his appointment. But it can not change that he was a lobbyist for a defense contractor. Why have a law that needs to be explained? Blackcoat</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.005 seconds using apc
Object Caching 629/630 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.dodbuzz.com

Served from: dodbuzz.com @ 2012-02-09 07:46:34 -->
