More Boots, And Wheels, to Afghanistan

More Boots, And Wheels, to Afghanistan

After some delay, the Obama administration is finally sending reinforcements to Afghanistan, months after they were first requested by the top American commander there, Gen. David McKiernan.

Four more combat brigades were needed to stage a counter-offensive against more than a dozen insurgent groups, McKiernan argued. Those attacks have grown increasingly brazen, such as last week’s suicide bombings in Kabul. SecDef Gates signed the orders yesterday that will send an Army Stryker brigade and a Marine Expeditionary Brigade to Afghanistan beginning this spring, a total of 12,000 combat troops, adding to the 38,000 U.S. troops already there.

As important as the added combat troops and highly mobile Strykers, the Pentagon said it is also sending a combat aviation brigade from the 82nd Airborne that is due to arrive this spring. Heavily laden U.S. troops trying to chase down fleet-footed mujahedeen fighters in Afghanistan’s rugged, mountainous terrain are hobbled by a lack of helicopters. The helicopter shortage there is so acute that American wounded must wait up to two hours, or longer, for a medevac. A single Army aviation brigade is currently in Afghanistan.


Will the additional troops make a difference? They are almost certain to have a tactical effect, if they are used to stem the free-flow of insurgents and weapons into Afghanistan from Pakistan and to establish some semblance of security on the main transportation routes, a natural mission for the Strykers. The major insurgent lines of operation are southwest of Kabul, around Khost, where insurgents cross over the mountainous border from the lawless FATA region of Pakistan, launch attacks, and then scurry back to their sanctuaries. The other major insurgent highway is the actual highway from the Pakistani city of Quetta to Kandahar.

A report by the International Council on Security and Development that compiled reported insurgent attacks in 2008 shows that those attacks closely follow the major supply routes and are directed against targets-of-opportunity, where security forces are absent. Running Strykers up and down those roads should make a big difference. But rooting out the insurgents permanently will be a much tougher task.

A report out this week, authored by RAND’s Seth Jones, a very sharp Afghanistan analyst, says that since 2002, the number of different insurgent groups operating in Afghanistan has risen sharply, they are often mutually supporting and have formed a “complex adaptive system” of “sprawling multi-organizational networks.” These networks include the Taliban and groups such as Hekmatyar’s Hezb-i-Islami, drug traffickers, warlords and their militia and local tribes. This marks a stark contrast from pre-9–11 Afghanistan when the Taliban insurgency was hierarchically structured. Now, the Afghan insurgency in many ways resembles the diffuse Iraqi insurgency. The intricate transportation network established by drug and criminal groups connecting Afghanistan to Pakistan is now used by the Taliban and other insurgents.

Jones says more troops alone will not defeat the complex and adaptive insurgency now active in Afghanistan. Its emergence occurred largely because of the absence of government, particularly at the local level. Foreign aid has largely benefitted the “urban elite,” causing intense resentment among the rural population. Weak administration and a lack of control in some provinces has allowed the Taliban and others to step into the void, taxing people and often providing security. Where resisted, they terrorize the people.

To stem the insurgency, Jones says the U.S. must focus on beefing up district-level institutions that are Afghan led and providing support to the local population; should shift from direct action attacks against the Taliban to building Afghan security forces where there is currently a 70 percent shortfall in police mentors and 30 percent shortfall for the army; remove and prosecute corrupt officials; and focus resources on fortifying Afghanistan’s porous borders.

Additional troops is a good first step. The military also needs to boost the number of trainers sent to Afghanistan and re-task some of those Army special forces units away from chasing insurgents to mentoring Afghan army battalions.

Share |

Join the Conversation

Why did GW BUSH not let us take the drug money, years ago? One Joint Interagency Task Force up armored w/ combined air was all we needed.

The delay shouldn’t be credited to President Obama; he’s only been in office one month!

To achieve a significant change in Afghanistan we must not forget the Russian experience there,esp;the folks WE trained to fight a force who operate as standard uniformed armies against other uniformed armies,their cells will ALWAYS attack&dissapear to regroup later.If the Afgans can’t or won’t be trained to oppose the“insurgants” & be willing to sacrifice for the FREEDOM for themselves(alas,muslim people usu.prefer their own dictators)Then we should know you can’t FORCE republican(not the party) ideals on others.

I saw an advance view of a powerful movie called BROTHERS AT WAR. This movie so gets it. Gary Sinise—a name every military person respects—put his name on it as executive producer. A filmmaker brother in Decatur, Illinois, embeds with his two brother’s units in Iraq—US military at work from a brother’s-eye-view. One brother graduated top of his West Point class. The other is an Army Sniper. I screened it with almost every branch of the military. They said it too: “I can’t believe he got that. That’s exactly right and no one else is showing that.” Check out http://​www​.brothersatwarmovie​.com It opens March 13 in five cities near bases: LeJeune, Bragg, Benning—and Chicago and DC. Two weeks later it rolls out nationally. TELL EVERYONE YOU KNOW. Support a war movie that does it right. Forget Hollywood and see this amazing documentary.

*required

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement