Carter Named for ATL; Observers Praise His Brains

Carter Named for ATL; Observers Praise His Brains

I offered odds of 3:2 that Ash Carter would be nominated as undersecretary of defense for acquisition, technology and logistics and no one took them. Good thing, since he was officially nominated late this morning by President Obama.

Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said at a noon press conference that he hoped to hold a nomination hearing on Carter as soon as possible. Asked if he supported the nomination, Levin sounded lukewarm, saying he would go through the nomination process and see what he found.

Some in industry and the Pentagon’s acquisition shop have been worried and quietly sniping about Carter’s appointment, noting he has comparatively little acquisition experience. However, several sources told me over the last two days that Carter has actually done a fair amount of consulting work for industry from his Harvard perch and is more familiar with industry concerns and possibilities than one might guess from his background as a physicist, arms control expert and professor of international relations.


One very experienced Pentagon watcher praised Carter for his intelligence and grasp of the issues, saying industry may be frightened because Carter does not come bearing the baggage of an acquisition expert and may be willing to take tough decisions without first worrying about the effects it may have on a company. Of course, acquisition experts have not performed terribly well over the last decade since they often seemed unwilling to hold industry to the tough standards embodied in both existing acquisition policy and regulations.

Following is Carter’s White House bio:

Carter, a physicist and current Chair of the International & Global Affairs faculty at the Kennedy School, served as Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Policy from 1993 to 1996. He directed military planning during the 1994 crisis over North Korea’s nuclear weapons program; was instrumental in removing all nuclear weapons from the territories of Ukraine, Kazakstan, and Belarus; directed the establishment of defense and intelligence relationships with the countries of the former Soviet Union when the Cold War ended; and participated in the negotiations that led to the deployment of Russian troops as part of the Bosnia Peace Plan Implementation Force. Dr. Carter managed the multi-billion dollar Cooperative Threat Reduction (Nunn-Lugar) program to support elimination of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons of the former Soviet Union, including the secret removal of 600 kilograms of highly enriched uranium from Kazakstan in the operation code-named Project Sapphire. Dr. Carter also directed the Nuclear Posture Review and oversaw the Department of Defense’s (DOD’s) Counterproliferation Initiative. He directed the reform of DOD’s national security export controls. In 1997 Dr. Carter co-chaired the Catastrophic Terrorism Study Group with former CIA Director John M. Deutch, which urged greater attention to terrorism. From 1998 to 2000, he was deputy to William J. Perry in the North Korea Policy Review and traveled with him to Pyongyang. In 2001–2002, he served on the National Academy of Sciences Committee on Science and Technology for Countering Terrorism and advised on the creation of the Department of Homeland Security. Dr. Carter was twice awarded the Department of Defense Distinguished Service Medal, the highest award given by the Department. In addition to his current position at the Kennedy School, Carter is Co-Director (with former Secretary of Defense William J. Perry) of the Preventive Defense Project, a research collaboration of Harvard and Stanford Universities.

Join the Conversation

This could be one of the most pragmatic and effective appointments yet. I hope Obama succeeds in changing government for the better!
The past 16 years have been disheartening to say the least.

DOD acquisition is an unmitigated nightmare. (I worked in and with the process for many years as a contractor and trusted agent. It may be that new thinking can help (with the help of congress) solve some of the more serious problems.

Sheila Widnall was smart too. It didn’t make her an effective SECAF.

The acquisition mess doesn’t need a rocket scientist. Just someone with an intimate knowledge of all the business processes, office politics, and a significant amount of moral courage.

Without that in-depth knowledge of how things work, he will constantly have to depend on the mid-level managers for knowledge and advice. The same mid-level managers who are obsessed with careerism and who have nothing to gain by reforming the process.

Reply to “K”: Sheila Widnall was educated, and that does not make someone necessarily smart. She covered many times for the abuses of then-General Joseph Ashy, then head of Space Command, with his custom comfort capsule and his 21 year old blonde enlisted aide, a violation of personnel regs. When Ashy got caught abusing military travel by sending his wife off on personal junkets on AF planes as well as personal trips for himself and his hot blonde “aide”, he wrote a check to Widnall and Widnall put it in a safe and never cashed it.

Today’s Air Force is the epitome of corruption in the military. The Jill Metzger fraud and the Darleen Druyun tanker scandal are just tips of the icebergs.

As long as careerism and the revolving-door still exist at the Pentagon, Eisenhower’s 1958 warning on the military-industrial-congressional-complex still hold true today.

Well, I hope he gives the troops on the ground watever they need to win and keep themselves alive.

The nomination of Ashton Carter as the DoD’s Acquisition Executive is yet another political favor for someone who lacks the relevant experience for such a critical government position. Senators Levin and McCain recently introduced the Weapon System Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 where among other things called for an infusion of highly skilled and capable acquisition specialists into the DoD to address the problems in the defense acquisition system. I assume Mr. Carter’s nomination to lead the highly skilled acquisition corps will require another waiver by the President. It will be a sad day when program managers of the major defense acquisition programs have 20 years more acquisition experience than the executive they are seeking approval from.

Ash Carter received degrees in theoretical physics and medieval history from Oxford and Yale. The majority of his career was spent in Cambridge as a Harvard professor for International Affairs, including the time when an aspiring law student named Barack Obama was President of the Harvard Law Review. As President Obama pledges to “reform our defense budget so that we’re not paying for Cold War-era weapons systems we don’t use”, Carter’s ample publications in the Soviet Union and nuclear non-proliferation should prove invaluable.

While Ash Carter has penned plenty of publications on Defense, he has never served in the military, never worked for a defense contractor building a weapon system, and his only defense acquisition experience was briefly as a budget analyst nearly 30 years ago. His Pentagon job during the Clinton Administration was focused on International Security countering WMDs and nuclear proliferation. He will now be responsible for executing hundreds of billions of dollars, a complex acquisition system with endless policies and laws that rival the US tax code, and dealing with hostile camps of bureaucrats across DoD and Industry. As the defense acquisition community stresses the need to build its workforce with experienced professionals, it is disappointing that it will be lead by an apprentice to the industry.

If Ash Carter ever struggles to determine which defense contractor to award the next billion dollar contract to, I’m sure Deputy Secretary of Defense (and former Raytheon lobbyist) William Lynn will be able to advise him. Note to self, contact my stockbroker.

“The highly skilled acqisition corps”?!?!
I work with Air Force acquisition types in my civilian job and so far the only real skills I’ve seen displayed were the Synchronized Cross-desk Paper Shuffle, the Team Pointless Meetings and Conferences Endurance Event, the Days Till Retirement Countdown, and last but not least, the Why Won’t the Fucking DTS Take My Itinerary Change Rant-off.
The actual highly skilled professionals that are still working in acquisition are working for Boeing, Lockheed-Martin, EADS, and a few companies that have contracts to do acquisition work for the government. The ones left here are all biding their time to retirement.

soonergrunt…your description of the acquisition corps office where i work is the same. Military officer’s come in and spend their time handling office special event parties, admin worthless stuff, and travel to other offices on TDY constantly, going to cnferences in florida in the winter, and a sitting around reading on the internet. The DCMA offices and PMO offices complain about decreased resources…not. Those positions that were eliminated were transferred to DFAS, and other agencies. DCMA closed down 12 district DCASR overhead offices which got rid of about 500 paper pushers per office who never saw a contract or contractor or weapons systems, so that was good. More streamlining is needed. A skilled work force that works is the answer to the waste not more employees. But this past week in hearings in a house subcommittee the retired generals who ran the show for acquistion and contracting the past ten years said the cure for pentagon was to hire more of them…unbelievable…America needs to get the media to focus in on this instead of AIG. The trillion dollars a year of taxpayers money being spent at DoD is a hundreds times worst. Hopefully an outsider can bring a new perspective.

mike: We’re all used to thinking of bankers as being rich, evil fat cats though. The negative stereotype of soldiers is “evil babykillers”. Nobody thinks of someone in a uniform being a useless moneywaster.

Part of the issue is that, along the way, someone decided that the key to acquisition management was to run it like any other business. Methods developed for mass-producing toasters and lightbulbs were now going to be applied to one-off billion-dollar radio satellites, and to programs that would build 150 aircraft that were expected to last 50 years (instead of four million mp3 players that would be lucky if they made it past 3 years.)

*required

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement