2008 — Afghanistan’s Lost Year

2008 — Afghanistan’s Lost Year

In 2008, Afghanistan went from the “forgotten war,” to a war the U.S. and NATO could very well lose. Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair gave the intel community’s global threat assessment to the Senate Armed Services Committee on Tuesday and their read on developments in Afghanistan was gloomy to say the least.

The past year has witnessed a dramatic jump in both the frequency and geographic scope of attacks by the Taliban-led insurgency as it has spread to previously peaceful areas around Kabul and in west Afghanistan. Insurgents are showing greater battlefield skill and more “aggressiveness.”

Insurgent gains have come “despite” U.S. and NATO military strikes “targeting insurgent command and control networks,” says the report provided by Blair. The country is slipping into chaos and there is little government control outside Kabul and even NGOs are often unable to provide help to the Afghan people for fear of being knocked off by the Taliban. The government’s glaring ineffectiveness in the face of an intractable insurgency cause tribal and other local leaders to either sit on the fence, instead of supporting the central government or, worse, cast their lot with the insurgents. The Afghan people’s confidence in their own government is hampered by “endemic corruption” and the burgeoning drug trade. Efforts to build the Afghan security forces are struggling.

“Continued progress has been made in expanding and fielding the Afghan National Army, but the shortage of international trainers in the field, high operational tempo, attrition, and absenteeism hamper efforts to make units capable of independent action. The Afghan National Police remains a largely untrained force with high rates of corruption and absenteeism. Limitations to training, mentoring, and equipping combined with an ineffective Ministry of Interior and large parts of the country that have not been effectively “cleared” hinder the progress and effectiveness of the policy.”

A GAO report out this week says the number of insurgent attacks on Afghan security forces rose from 97 in October 2007 to 289 in October 2008. At least 3,400 Afghan police have been killed or wounded since January 2007.

To better understand why the Taliban are proving such a difficult enemy read this excellent tactical and operational assessment of the enemy by retired Australian army officer David Kilcullen, former counterinsurgency advisor to Gen. David Petraeus, in National Review. As he explains, the Taliban “are the most tactically competent enemy we currently face in any theater.” Most Taliban groups combine a local clandestine network with a main force of guerrilla fighters, along with large numbers of fanatical young men from the madrassas across the border in Pakistan to serve as cannon fodder.

The insurgent’s small unit skills in ambushing, use of IEDs, sniping and field defense are very good. Insurgent equipment has improved substantially and is now better than that of the Afghan army and police, he writes. Taliban snipers are very good: they “have graduated from the category of Marksmen to become true sniper pairs in the professional military sense. This bespeaks at least some training by professionally qualified military snipers.”

Local warlords and the Taliban wield vast power in the absence of any government authority. The drug trade fuels the insurgency, providing insurgent commanders the funds to buy fighters, weapons and bribe any government officials who remain on the job. UN estimates put the total value to producers of Afghan opium in 2008 at $730 million.

The intel community report said the Predator bomber offensive against Al Qaeda targets in Pakistan’s Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) has been relatively successful over the past year and that the group has lost “significant parts” of its command structure. They assessed the strikes against Al Qaeda lieutenants to be as “damaging to the group as any since the fall of the Taliban in late 2001.”

As long as the Afghan insurgency has a sanctuary in neighboring Pakistan, defeating the various groups that hop back and forth across the border is impossible, the report says. The top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, Gen. David McKiernan, told the BBC this week, there are large areas of southern and eastern Afghanistan, “where we are not winning.”

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Join the Conversation

All
My Opine.
1. Tactically, we need to increase the Overhead Watch of the Predators, combined with more directed SPEC OPS strikes.
2. Initiate an Agent Orange defloiation of the Heroin crops. The strike, for only one season, would effectively end the money flow.
3. Strike the Pakistani/Afghanistan border areas with Heavy Bomber strikes, similar to the ancient Cambodian strikes of yesteryear. Continue these til the area is a Moon Scape.
From the FP State Dept Front. Send Hillary there and keep her there, to send the Mrs Thatcher message of no longer tolerating a Texas Two Step procedure.
end

Did the Russians fail afganistan?????? was it there Vietnam??????

History People .…. Read your History.….

Then Learn from it…

Apply it. or … History repetes itself

I am currently fighting in A-stan. The enemy is tactically incompetent. Their tactical incompetence is unfortunately only exceeded by the operational incompetence of the Coalition.
There is no overarching COIN strategy, no unity of command and no unity of effort. The enemy is numerically, technologically and tactically outmatched in almost every category. Sniper attacks are few and far between.
THE COALITION NEEDS TO SECURE THE POPULATION. This can only be accomplished by pushing out into the viliages in mutually supportive positions. The people have no choice but to support the Taliban at this time. ANSF paired with CF trainer/enablers needs to push out into the population centers and the Taliban will have no choice but to fight or flee. IEDs cannot be successfully emplaced under constant surveillance. When the Taliban choose to fight CF enabled ANSF they lose every time. Securing the population is the only path to victory. Done correctly, vast swaths of the countryside will become uninhabitable to the Taliban in a very short amount of time.

I agree with Tenn Slim. Tactical air strikes would disrupt the drug trade in afghanistan and put an economic strain on the drug lords. Air supremacy is helpful to any military victory. Air power used like artillery would make it more difficult for heroin and opium crops to fund insurgent offensives. Heavy Bomber strikes like from c-130’s were used in the past and we can use these flying fortresses to gain ground control.

You know we are not in afghanistan for the afghani’s. We are there because the Taliban were allowing the Al-qaeda to strike out at other country’s from their borders and getting involved with the al-qaeda group!. In reality we do not give a hoot about the Afghan’s . The people of afghan let their country be taken over by the thugs, the Taliban. The people are armed. They have always been armed. But no they let the Taliban take over. They let the Taliban tell them that the women of their nation can not be schooled ‚they kill them if they think they have done some thing to embarrass the family name. You know that is asinine. But that is the way it is over there. So why should we be concerned with the way they chose to live.They are tribal,clannish, There religion and their clerics dictates to them how they will live. Their clerics judge them by their Koran and by what he “the cleric“thinks. they don’t like each other. So let them kill each other off. Why push our way of life on some one that has lived the way they have for thousands of years. They will go the way of the cave man in the long run. All we need to do is keep them and their kind out of our country!!!.No I have no sympathy for some one that is as hard headed, Blind,and Really Stupid to let some thing like this happen to them.Germany let it happen back in the 1930’s with Hitler and the Nazis Thur economic desperation, and prejudicial feelings of hate for ( the supposed true cause of the whole worlds troubles the “Jews”)???.Well it’s not like that. It is how we listen to who ever has the best line of Bull S__T out there to sway our feelings!!!.

It seems we let outselves in for another Vietnam. Just like before, another democratic party and congress. Anybody who doesn‘t remember, we fought, and pulled out of vietnam. The problem is that people like pelosi and reid, are opposed to military action that threatens their political careers. In this website at shock and awe, is a video about 38 terrorist training camps in our country. When we are attacked here by radicalized muslims, that live here and train here, all heck will break loose. We should be there and check these people who would kill us. Stonewall is right about letting them kill each other. musliims don‘t like it when you criticize radical muslims. So right there is the mentality of the religion of peace. As a vietnam veteran I believe that everyone who has written here are correct in their opinions. The populace needs to be secured, in our day it was called hearts and minds. And still they brutalized the hamlets, and executed people. One other point, the nazi party outlawed christianity, so what make you think that the taliban are any different? I just hope this insanity plays itself before this old man has to fight them.

Unlike vietnam.…. We went to afgan for a reason… a pretty darn goood, clear reason if you as me! If pakistan took care of them on there side, we wouldnt have to chase them back and forth over the border… everytime they get in trouble they end up running back to pakistan…

What I think is needed is to not fight this war for them, but to help them support there own government and start makeing them take baby steps to help be able to support them selves.

More and more GI’s lose there lifes because we have to take action for them, I know that we DO work with them. But its time that plans be made AND FOLLOWED THOUGH WITH to see that they will be able to support them sevles.

Insurgents are showing greater battlefield skill and more “aggressiveness.” Do you think that they might be getting training from some one. I havent read or seen anything stating that fact.

I find it disheartening that people would try and retread failed Viet Nam strategies like carpet bombing civilians. Please do some elemental research on the continuing damage that persists to this day in Laos and Cambodia.

*required

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement