Pakistani Taliban Hit NATO Supply Lines, Again

Pakistani Taliban Hit NATO Supply Lines, Again

Militants attacked a trucking terminal in the northern Pakistan city of Peshawar today, setting ablaze 16 Humvees and bulldozers bound for U.S. and NATO forces. Today’s attack follows similar attack yesterday where militants set fire to more than 20 trucks that were also sat on a lot, loaded with supplies for NATO forces, the Pakistani English language paper Dawn reported.

Both attacks occurred within Peshawar’s environs, not on some isolated stretch of road up in the Khyber. In both cases, at least two dozen militants disarmed the security guards, who I’m guessing were not that heavily armed, and then went about torching the vehicles.

As Bill Roggio over at Long War Journal notes, yesterday’s attack was the first since a Feb. 3 attack on a NATO convoy in the Jamrud region in the Khyber tribal agency. Roggio counts up at least 450 NATO vehicles and containers having been destroyed by militant attacks in the Peshawar area in recent months. Pakistani Taliban lieutenant Hakeemullah Mehsud is leading the supply line attacks as he expands his power and influence in the tribal territories, Roggio writes.

Close to 80 percent of supplies bound for U.S. and NATO troops run the overland route from the Pakistani port city of Karachi, north to Peshawar, then across the Khyber Pass into Afghanistan. Cargo ships offload in Karachi, a city more under the control of various militant and criminal gangs than the government, then the road either skirts or transits directly through Pakistani Taliban territory almost its entire length. As the Pakistani Taliban have grown in strength over the past few years, attacks on the supply line have correspondingly increased.

To keep a modern land army fed, fueled and armed requires a secure land route. Aerial resupply is not an option. The U.S. and NATO have negotiated with Russia for an overland route through the Central Asian republics. Some NATO countries, and reportedly even the U.S., are in discussions with Iran over possibly using Iranian ports and highways to move supplies and equipment to Afghanistan.

Keeping the coalition in Afghanistan supplied is shaping up to be one of the most challenging aspects of the entire endeavor, and one which didn’t really exist a year or so ago. Maintaining an army of some 140,000 troops in Iraq would have been impossible without Kuwait’s good graces, a friendly nation that allowed us to turn it’s territory into a supply depot, training ground and transit point for men and material. Pakistan is not and never will be a Kuwait.

When the Russians occupied Afghanistan, they at least had a secure overland route to friendly territory. There may be an upper limit to the number of troops the Obama administration can deploy to Afghanistan until they get the supply issue nailed down.

Photo: Photobucket​.com

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Join the Conversation

What in the world is wrong with this set-up; Literly(sp) I don’t NATO, the do nothing POS of the world just give the crap to the taliban. This really smells. Spary the damn area with pigs blood and intrails. I find NATO, and am underwhelmed if the spelling is wrong as stated above POS’S. I find this mess to be another way for NATO to pay us back for going in to this with out their consent. I’d like to cr*p down their neck and put the head on backwards and stuffed somewhere dark and moist.

God Bless the Fire Eaters
Semper Fi

Why not make the Pakistani Army responsible for the security of all our supplies and convoys? We are giving them billions of dollars every year. It is time for them to “man up” and do their duty. If our supplies are “lost” or destroyed, the replacement cost (including transportation) should come out of what we have been giving them.

450 destroyed vehicles and containers worth an average of possibly $100,000 each is $45 million (remember the good stuff goes by air). Seems like a drop in the bucket to what we are giving Pakistan and spending on both wars each month. Half a percent of the monthly dollar total? Suspect some Soldiers will be happy they ends up with a $1 million M-ATV instead of an uparmored HMMWV.

In addition, StrategyPage says we have been delivering 20% more containers daily than the 78 required. Problem yes. Game changer no.

well the pak army has this almost mythical fear to the taliban theyd rather fight indians.i remeber seeing all the stories of darpa working on big airships that could move these supplies without having to cross any other roads and could land on the major fobs in country for distribution from the inside outwards.something that would be next to impossible to stop.

So why should the Pakistani Goverment care its not theirs!!!. they probably told them about what was there!. Are some one with inside information???.

It’s hard to guard and protect this equipment when 1, there getting their kickback and 2, It’s hard to shootback/defend when your’e running the other direction.

I’m convinced we have morons running the military. Do they get their jobs based on PC, or by kissing ass? Why would they move materiel through Pakistan, which is unsecured and unreliable? There are alternatives. There are
other countries that can channel supplies to
Afghanistan without most of it being ripped off
and winding up in the hands of our enemies. Fly
in most of the stuff. We do have an airfield in
Afghanistan. And we have relations with Turkmenistan. They have ports to receive military cargo by boat. Both options are certainly better than Pakistan. Fire the
morons in charge and bring in civilian logistics experts.

Bomb the Damn stageing area on our way out!
Stop all funding to the Paks.

i agree with the bomb the hell outta the area on our way oput , bring in supplies thru any country that will allow us.. some that would trust us if Obama doesnt screw up the promised missle batteries as bush had signed into place.
so far i see a man who declared he would change things and all i can see is him doing exactly as bush was doing. makes one wonder how many obamanites can we find now.

*required

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement