Last Hurrahs for T-Sat

Last Hurrahs for T-Sat

The first details about what is happening inside one of the biggest programs marked for cancellation by Defense Secretary Gates are beginning to filter out. In the days after Gates announced its planned demise, Boeing and Lockheed Martin went through what may well be the last design reviews for the Transformational Satellite program.

A source familiar with the program told us that the attitude during the reviews was pretty “fatalistic,” which would certainly not be in keeping with the approach many contractors are going to take to programs targeted by Gates. While some in industry talk about the secretary’s speech last week helping things by clearing the air or introducing more stability into the fevered atmosphere surrounding the defense industry the last month or so, many defense industr6y types have been loading up for bear, preparing detailed lobbying campaigns and community outreach. But the Boeing and Lockheed teams were apparently resigned to the end of their program.

One source said, “everyone seems to figure that this was the last hurrah for the program.” One data point — the contracts for the Boeing and Lockheed efforts only run until July. In one worrying signal to the space defense industrial base, this source said many program employees “are definitely working on their resumes, but nobody’s panicking.”


Our source offered a detailed analysis of what may have led to Gates’ decision to stop funding the $29 billion program. One of the biggest hammers to fall on T-Sat was the decision last year to go with what some called T-Sat light, which would have dropped the laser communications allowing two T-Sats to laze data to each other at very high speed. That appeared to leave congressional aides skeptical that T-Sat would provide a greatly increased capability at an acceptable level of risk. While eliminating the lasers reduced much of the technical risk, it also left the military wondering what it was getting that was so much better than the current AEHF satellite program. “Eliminating lasercom really knocked out the lion’s share of the technical issues; although it also knocked out the primary reason for going to a completely new bus instead of an overgrown AEHF,” our source said.

Another factor in killing the program was the decision at the beginning of the program to require use of a military standard bus, the structure into which the satellite is integrated. “Meeting the requirements for 1540E drove a lot of the design details for TSAT; it wasn’t just a question of stuffing all the payload into the box,” our source explains.

However, it remains to be seen what mix of capabilities the Pentagon will go with, in addition to the fifth AEHF Gates has committed to buy. Commercial satellite companies are eager for the business and will battle hard to win some of the T-Sat dollars.

Join the Conversation

Colin, correct me if I’m wrong, but Gates hasn’t “canceled” anything yet, right? As far as I know, they don’t even have a formal budget proposal yet.

Aurora, You are right. He has not cancelled anything. I edited the piece to reflect that he plans to cancel it…

Aurora: At this point, the only things to be overturned will likely be strongly redolent of the pork-barrel. There are no members of Congress who’ve spoken in favor of TSAT–it’s very likely that few of them even know what it is. And even an “industry support” argument won’t fly, because Gates is ordering the USAF to buy more AEHF (and LockMart would have ended up building TSAT anyway, and they’re building AEHF right now.)

No guarantee that Lockheed would have gotten the nod for TSAT. Although they are building the AEHF, Boeing has the WGS contract. If we were talking about reconnaissance satellites I might have agreed with you Density.

yeah, nothing is official until congress meets. but one would think that out of all the programs cut, congress will probably care about this one the least.

as for who would win, it is hard to say. but it would certainly be Boeing or Lockheed. hell, the TSAT Bidder’s Library is entitled “The Boeing/Lockheed Bidder’s Library” (something to that effect).

bryan: considering that Boeing and Lockheed were the only two contractors bidding on TSAT, I’d suggest that the winner being Boeing or Lockheed was a virtual certainty! 8D

Hi Colin,

am I wrong, or is the picture showing an artist’s view of the European Artemis satellite communicating via laser link (with Envisat?)?

To be honest, Im not sure. It’s the best illustration of the laser coms concept I could find!

Oh come on, you couldn’t find a shark with a FRICKIN LASER attached to its forehead?

Since one of the major players who would have required the TSAT deployment, and its huge networking upgrade, FCS, is also in danger, they appear to be joined at the hip in the cost cutting bowl. If one has been reading all the previous hype of net centric warfare and the need for a GIG-BE, jointed together with a Joint Tactical Edge Network, we can see that many of the functions that are or were looking to also benefit from that architecture and the huge data rates it was going to provide , may also be in danger.
Yes we can keep looking for adding more of existing technology, but still no major increase of overall bandwidth. The functions of being able to cross network these Sats together via laser, was a major technology advancement, and allowed them to be full routers not just point to point , bridges. In addition the major improvement in bandwidth is really what is being looked for by all of the services, not just small increments. The only real major winners here, are the other service providers who will see the demise of TSAT as a starters gun to launch many more of their own private satellites to fill in the gaps and look at maybe a few working together to see how they can provide some kind of TSAT Lite, with the very cross routing that TSAT may have provided, along with the imense improvement in data rates, and over all bandwidth to/for the warfighter. I understand we cannot afford everything, but this would have been a major improvement to all of the warfighters, in all of the servives to expand the very critical improvements to their own information systems, that everyone claims needs to be expanded and updated. Without the additional bandwidth, controlled ‚secured and Monitored by the Military, we will always be a step slow and force the services to come up with their own place holders at a much lower level of the sky to help them provide that GIG/BE they had been promised. That may cost much more than TSAT, and provide much less.

*required

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement