Budget Gag Orders Stopped Leaks: Gates

Budget Gag Orders Stopped Leaks: Gates

The nondisclosure agreements Defense Secretary Robert Gates required everyone involved in the 2010 budget deliberations to sign, may well become standard operating procedure given how successful they were in preventing leaks from a notoriously porous Pentagon about the secretary’s “hard choices.” Gates said it was nothing short of a “miracle” that few details on spending or decisions on key weapons programs were leaked to the press, Congress or industry during more than three months of deliberations with the service chiefs, the Joint Chiefs, senior civilians and combatant commanders.

[Eds. note: Buzz readers will note that Gates’ miracle was flawed as we broke the news about the FCS MGV cancellation plans.]

“[It] was critically important as we considered dramatic changes in the way we were going to procure things and programmatic changes to specific programs was that we be able to have those deliberations among the senior military and the senior civilians in the department without the newspapers printing, every single day, the results of our deliberations the preceding day,” Gates said last week, speaking at the Naval War College, Newport R.I.

Gates took the unusual step earlier this year of requiring everyone involved in the 2010 budget deliberations sign nondisclosure agreements. The 2010 defense budget had already become politically hot well before deliberations began in earnest when news got out that the Joint Chiefs of Staff had prepared a draft budget request of $584 billion (an 8 percent increase over 2009), putting the incoming Obama administration into the position of having to “cut” defense. The Obama administration’s 2010 defense budget request is $527 billion.

Gates said the nondisclosure agreements allowed participants to concentrate on making decisions that were sure to rile some, instead of, “looking over our shoulder at contractors and Congress and everybody else, and trying preemptively to see how we would get around their objections.”

While the SecDef said there were multiple discussions with the service chiefs throughout the process, major weapons program decisions made very late in the game likely caught some service chiefs by surprise. Gates said he finally decided to cut the bulk of the Army’s FCS modernization program over the weekend before he announced his decisions on Monday. Gates said the Army leadership had made it clear they opposed the cut.

Gates said the budget deliberations were a “collaborative effort” and that all of the services’ programs were examined: “I also thought it was important for the service chiefs each to see that they were not being singled out — that we were looking at the programs of all the services.”

Gates made it clear he understands that the real battle over the 2010 budget has yet to be joined: “We’ll get into the political tradeoffs once the Congress starts looking at this budget.”

There’s a good chance Pentagon lawyers will bust out the nondisclosure agreements at some point during the QDR strategic review, set to begin later this month. Gates said he intends the QDR to determine the fate of a number of big weapons programs such as the Marine Corps Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle and the Air Force’s plans for a long range bomber.

The signed agreements weren’t the only thing keeping participants quiet. Gates said the size of the group involved in the budget talks was large enough to get input from different stakeholders but was not so large that it would be impossible to figure out who leaked if information got out.

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Join the Conversation

If you liked the management style of McNamara, Brown and Rumsfeld, then you are going to love Mr. Gates style. Just one question: How did things turn out under the McNamara, Brown & Rumsfeld??

FUBAR

What is Mr Gates tryin to hide?

The chain of command is the heart of the military. Without it there would be revolution after revolution in this country. The military obeyed orders just as the neo-con hero Ollie North did under Reagan. PEO and PMO offices need to stay out of the Congressional marks and let the SecDEF do the job that the President appointed him to do. Decisions made with the approval and thumbs up for the changes should be what makes it, not the whims of those who seek their “money”

Mike,
Thx for the civics lesson but you miss the point. It is the duty of the CJCS/VJCS and Service Chiefs to provide military advice and obey orders. If the advice is ignored or discarded on a vital national security issue(s), then it would be the duty said officer(s) to resign as a matter of good faith and honor. Evidently, either Adm Mullen & Co agree with Obama or they are lackeys. None of us has access to “tank” conversations, so we cannot determine ground truth. That said, if Gen Schwartz agrees with the Obama agenda, then he should do as he has done; but CSAF should not be surprised to receive a “Weapon’s School debrief” from others in the Air Force and Defense community. The “right” to issue that “debrief” is our right…1st Amendment.

Clasic case of mushroom therapy — left in the dark and fed a bunch of shit. Mr. Gates does not want the details of his reforms public ‚because anyone with half a brain is going to say ” WHAT The HELL”. In terms of national security , I do not know about you but I am not worried about insurgents attacking us here at home. I also understand that the ground pounders need some help but the rape and pillage of the Air Force and possibly the Marines is apalling!!

Having closed the debate, the Sec Def missed many opportunities to develop alternative courses which could maximize a positive outcome; notably, he had the opportunity to export 60 F 22s to Japan and possibly 20 to Australia; but by terminiating the F-22 program as he has no such option existsl by buyin two more years of F-22s that would be 40 for the US he ends up with possibly 120 F22s more in the Pacific; and such an announcement after the N Koreans lobbed missiles towards us would have had an effect; and continuing to deny deployment to the middile east as part of our exit and engagement strategy to deal with Iran as we “withdraw” from Iraq would demonstrate strategic leadeship as opposed to this sideshow on “defense cuts” to sustain our occupation forces.

Ahhhhh.…The Jimmy Carter era all over again. Remember the “Desert Rescue”? Made possible by judicious Defense spending for three years. You remember the “Peace Dividend”, right?

Gutting our conventional capability only makes it more likely that a future conflict will go nuclear. If we don’t have sufficient numbers of F-22s, bombers, and other aircraft to hold the enemy and/or push them back into their own territory, decision makers will be forced to escalate. We knew that a Soviet invasion of western Europe would go nuclear real quick because we lacked the conventional forces to hold back the inrushing tide. 183 first line 5th generation fighters (F-22s), 19 B-2s, and a dwindling number of legacy fighters and bombers are not going to be able to do the job. Gates has said that the Generals and Admirals are always planning to fight the last war — unfortunately, Mr. Gates isn’t planning to fight any wars.

I do agree, our closest allies should have access to the F-22. Japan, for one is maybe the closest to China, and wants them. The Brits? They have pretty much been there when we needed them, and I believe if they want them, should get them. Again, its $ thats blocking it. If we sell them, that means more Raptors in the air against a potential opponent-CHINA.

Jimmy Carter era? The Desert rescue? It was not Jmmy Carter who messed that up. The facts are is the the Procurement office messed up the mission. Factual history is that the wrong filters were purchased for the SEA KING helicopters, the contractor, who was located in Florida near Tampa warned the PMO that they were buying the wrong filters and the PMO ignored them. The mission at the time for Sea Kings were sea rescue and land rescue. The contractor suggested a better filter to block the desert sand from messing up the helicopters and the acquistion side of the military would not listen. The helicopters would not operate without sand filters. NOW YOU KNOW THE REST OF THE STORY!!!

Now you know the rest of the story!!!

It was Carter’s decision to mount such a weak response to Iran in the first place. The helicopter’s crashing were just icing on the cake. Much like the under-supported Army in Mogadishu in 1993. Dem president’s are minimalists when it comes to military responses and it ends up hurting our troops.

SAE KINGS, What sea Kins, they were not involved. If your knowledge on this matter is as screwed up as your imput thus far you better start all over YDS.
CH 53’s were the helios used in the operation. By the way former pres carter was against using forec to protect the LZ’s. He was really concerned about the safety of the operators involved.
Almost as concerned as former pres clinton was when his comment about troop losses at Mog ” How could you do(let ) this(happen) to me“
I pray for our comrades under the current admin daily

MaCH/RH-53D Sea Stallion Helicopter
Mag 1… I stand corrected on the sea kings, I meant Sea Stallions, eight of them, read your history. Your anger is frightening and your military mind set is what Americans should be wary of. The US did not even have a standing army through out its history, read the history of AMERICA. WE ONLY KEPT THE COAST GUARD CONTINOUSLY. After WWII we have a continuous Air Force, Army, Marines, etc., to defend agianst possible communists. Keeping a huge pentagon with thousands of redundant systems and programs of power point charts does not make america strong, we the people do. We spend more than the next 14 countries in the world together do and 11 of them are our allies. Why?

Actually, RH53D Sea Stallions were used. The USN’s version of the H53 platform, which the USN used for minesweeping.

I love how Gates claims that this was a collaborative effort with buy-in from all the services. I’m wondering how he reconciles that with “sign-or-resign” NDA.

****

mike: If someone cuts you off in traffic, you honk. You don’t follow him back to his house and then burn the place down with him and his whole family trapped inside. It’s a question of proportionate response; and with no significant conventional force, there is no possibility of proportionate response.

Unless you subscribe to the attitude that all those goo–uh, ASIANS ought to take care of their own problems and we don’t need whi–uh, AMERICANS getting involved.

Maybe Darby Conley can sign a NDA on his way to sensitivity classes or does that not FIT into the new STIMULUS plan? What would truly be SHOCKING and a MIRACLE would be if JUSTICE made a come back. Specifically for “unspeakable” heinous crimes against innocent American Civilians, including children, used as lifelong guinea pigs used for political/defense/monetary agenda’s which produce BILLIONS from the suffering and destruction of innocent lives, compounded by media psychopaths that add insult to injury with double entendre jokes or threats.
But that would probably be asking too much in the LAND OF THE FREE. Maybe they can get BO the portugeese dog to go fetch the Constitution. I’m sure that would make a real SPLASH for those DIE HARD ghosts of Our Founding Fathers.

http://comics.com/get_fuzzy/2009–04-21/
http://comics.com/get_fuzzy/2009–04-22/
http://​comics​.com/​g​e​t​_​f​u​z​zy/

Jane Doe,
Guess you picked a bad day to give up crystal meth? LOL

It sounds like political correctness is in if the powers that be find it to their liking.

This is much ado about nothing–when I worked on Army budget issues in the Pentagon in the 90s, all budget-related documents were classified SECRET–I bet they still are.

The NDAs I think are meant to remind people not to leak classified information outside the DoD until the numbers are final, to preclude the usual piecemeal leaking of data about programs that then get politicians and contractors and other folks, including those inside the rest of the government excited and who then start defending their turf. Gates is right–this doesn’t stifle dissent, it frees people to speak their minds and consider other options.

Will Obama “Openness & Transparency” finally shed light on government contractors performance? A request filed pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act seeking the rating scores of government contractors has finally reached the Office of the Under Secretary at the Department of Defense for final review and decision. During the past several years FOIA Group, Inc., a Washington based information firm, has repeatedly attempted to secure these ratings under FOIA, but met strong resistant from the Bush Administration bureaucracy. This resistant, according to FOIA Group Counsel Jeff Stachewicz, was due to the potential embarrassment of poor performing contractors continuing to receive major awards, particularly involving Iraq. These awards often exceed several hundreds millions dollars. There is no reason for the federal government to hide these ratings, Mr. Stachewicz stated. Equivalent type of performance ratings, often on the same companies, are maintained and published by State governments. Stachewicz points out that they are seeking only the rating scores, not detailed comments or discussion. Mr. Stachewicz noted that the timing of the final decision could not be better, in the new age of the President’s transparency and openness policy. Why shouldn’t the public have the right to know how contractors are performing using our tax dollars? DoD is expected to make a final decision within a few weeks.

*required

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement