Divorce, Pentagon Style

Divorce, Pentagon Style

Divorces usually leave the parties exhausted, miserable and, sometimes, a lot poorer. People fight over the kids, the dogs, the books. Only the Pentagon could be contemplating a divorce over a satellite system. But OSD is considering seeking permanent separation from NASA and NOAA, its confreres in the deeply troubled and fiscally challenged program known as NPOESS. The first recommendations on just how to divide the family assets and responsibilities are likely next week.

Here are some of the problems wracking the program. It may be as much as another $500 million over budget, roughly a 6 percent cost increase. It’s not enough to trigger another Nunn-McCurdy, but it’s a healthy increase. The original program costs were $6.8 billion. As of June 2006 they were estimated at $11.1 billion. They had risen to $14 billion as of June 2008, according to a congressional source. Tack on up to $500 million and you may be close to what the program will now cost taxpayers.

The original due date for the first satellite was this year. The first NPOESS satellite is now scheduled for launch in 2014, which some fear may leave a gap in the country’s weather forecasting abilities.

Perhaps the biggest problem NPOESS has faced –aside from continuing difficult technical issues with a sensor known as VIIRS and earlier production problems that appear to have been rectified — is its management structure.

It’s tough enough to run a highly technical and complex program with clear lines of authority. Now imagine a program that is run three — that’s right — three government agencies. The Defense Department is technically the lead agency running the program. It has milestone decision authority and the undersecretary of Defense for acquisition, technology and logistics is the executive agent for the program. But authority to run the program day to day, and week to week is vested in an entity called the Executive Committee, fondly known as the ExCom. This includes representatives from DoD, NASA and NOAA (the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, part of the Department of Commerce).

In May of 2006, two senior House Science Committee Democrats called for the removal of NOAA Administrator Conrad Lautenbacher and John Kelly deputy undersecretary for oceans and atmosphere. That didn’t happen. Instead, Lautenbacher promised to do a much better and more frequent job of reporting to Congress about NPOESS.

But two congressional aides and a senior OSD official all say that the ExCom remains a nightmare. It diffuses authority and slows the government’s ability to respond to problems. Also, the Pentagon worries that NOAA just does not possess the skill to manage a complex satellite program and NASA worries that DoD won’t listen to its scientists who help design the sensors and then depend on them for data.

Put all this together and divorce looks likely, the two congressional aides said. “I can’t imagine why we would not want a divorce,” said one Hill source. Senior Pentagon officials are in favor of the divorce.

If a divorce occurs, money may — as so often happens — be the hardest issue to solve. NOAA helps fund NPOESS but has never paid for such an expensive satellite. It is relatively little money for a Pentagon space program but the military is fed up with pouring money into a venture they can’t control and which does not seem to get much better with time.

If divorce occurs, things will in many ways return to normal for NOAA and NASA. In the past NOAA funded weather and climate satellites. NASA built them and launched them. Then NOAA ran them.

Tune in next week for the next exciting episode of, “As the Satellite Turns…”

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Join the Conversation

“the military is fed up with pouring money into a venture they can’t control and which does not seem to get much better with time.”

I find this hilarious.

To paraphrase Dr. Johnson’s comment about second marriages, an interagency satellite acquistion program is the triumph of hope over experience.

That said, the structure of ExCom may be less of the problem than inconstant oversight of a typically overeager first program manager. As a 2006 GAO report noted:

“The involvement of the NPOESS executive leadership committee was also inconsistent and indecisive—it wavered from frequent heavy involvement to occasional meetings with few resulting decisions. In the 32-month period from May 2003 through December 2005, the committee met formally six times. Despite mounting evidence of the seriousness of the
critical sensor problems, the committee did not effectively challenge the program manager’s optimistic assessments, and from May 2003 through December 2004, convened only twice to consider the program’s status.”

– “Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites, Steps Remain in Incorporating Lessons Learned from Other Satellite Programs,” http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-06–993

Aduus,

While the GAO report certainly was correct, that was then and this is now. Sources on both the civil and military side told me last week that the ExCom just doesn’t work, regardless of how fabulous or hardworking or insightful the PM might be now. Commerce doesn’t let NOAA act without clearing every decision at very high levels. The PM can’t act without clearance from NOAA. And so on and so forth. No one I spoke with held out hope that the ExCom could be fixed or rebuilt. And if that can’t be fixed the qualities of the PM matter much less than they should.

*required

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement