CRS Offers Prez Helo Options

CRS Offers Prez Helo Options

The Congressional Research Service possesses some of the most acute and reliable defense analysts in town. CRS has laid out four options for their lawmaker leaders to consider as they try to figure out what the heck to do with those VH-71 birds just itching to fly President Obama around. The options range from restructuring the current program and building 23 VH-71s to retrofitting the current fleet. The folks at AvWeek got their hands on the primer and their story appears below.


Capitol Hill researchers have laid out four options for providing a presidential helicopter, ranging from tweaking the VH-71 program of record to just upgrading the legacy fleet.

In its June 5 primer for U.S. lawmakers, the Congressional Research Service (CRS) attempted to take some of the heated rhetoric out of the VH-71 cancellation dispute raging between the Hill and the Pentagon by evaluating alternatives to terminating the program outright.


Four options were examined by CRS:

• Continue with the VH-71 program in its current form, with some restructuring, and procure 23 Increment II aircraft;

• Restructure the program to provide a total of 23 Increment I aircraft, including the five pilot-production Increment I aircraft already procured;

• Restructure the program to include one-for-one replacement of the existing 19-aircraft fleet with new Increment I aircraft;

• Upgrade and extend the existing fleet and pursue no new helicopter program of any kind for the next several years.

If the program is kept as-is, the Increment II aircraft would achieve initial operational capability (IOC) in FY 2019 at the earliest, according to the researchers. The Navy Department estimates the acquisition cost of this option at $13 billion or more, including sunk costs of $3 billion, CRS reported. Restructuring the program to provide 23 Increment I aircraft instead would put IOC at mid-2012 at a cost of $9.4 billion. That doesn’t include, however, the cost of maintaining and upgrading the existing fleet until the new aircraft comes online.

Over the next few months, Congress will have to determine just how urgent the need is to replace the VH-3D/VH-60N fleet and how much capability do the existing Increment I helicopters provide. There have been a number of different figures emerging from the Navy about the true service life of Increment I aircraft. The CRS report cites a March 30 Navy information paper to Congress that pegged it at 1,500 flight hours. But based on the EH-101, the base VH-71 aircraft, the helicopter should be good up to 10,000 hours.

In a recent teleconference sponsored by the Lexington Institute, Rep. Roscoe Bartlett (R-Md.) said, “There’s some confusion about the present [Increment I] helicopters. Ask the Navy about it and they will give you the best of each [aircraft] as though it’s a hybrid. We need them to come clean with us.”

According to that Navy information paper, the service did not pursue a full fatigue life certification of 10,000 hours because Increment I was only supposed to be an interim solution until even more capable Increment II aircraft were provided.

Aviation Week’s DTI | Bettina H. Chavanne | June 08, 2009
This article first appeared in Aerospace Daily & Defense Report.

Tags:

Join the Conversation

Another option — delete entire program and send the military folks back to military duties. Lease commercial helicopters in rare events President wants to ride in one. Send sack lunch.

I agree with Colonel Phillips. Obama has really enjoyed his new toys and has certainly
used them for trips to town hall meetings and a date. If a civilian form of transportation with proper security can be found then those should be used. Remember how Pelozi keeps our guys on standby for her trips to California with her family and friends and then cancels at the last minute. These perks are expensive and our guys are really needed elsewhere.

ya pelosi uses the airforce as her personal airlines..

Could someone please explain to me the need for 23 “presidential” helicopters? It seems that three would offer more than adequate redundancy and four would be overkill. Is it a COG thing? Thanks.

ditto, I’m for “privatizing” this perk, among others — we’re a bloated empire, wheezing in luxury we can no longer afford… the Chinese are patiently waiting for us, snickering if not outright laughing at our decline

This article from Jan. agrees with the Col.s
http://​www​.sandersresearch​.com/​i​n​d​e​x​.​p​h​p​?​o​p​t​i​o​n​=​c​o​m​_​c​o​n​t​e​n​t​&​a​m​p​;​t​a​s​k​=​v​i​e​w​&​a​m​p​;​i​d​=​1​3​9​4​&​a​m​p​;​I​t​e​m​i​d​=98

We don’t need 21, 8 VH-60s should be enough. And three Air Force Ones?

I know spinmasters love to bash Pelosi, and I don’t like her, but she is required to take USAF jets as she is #3 in the chain-of-command and terrorists might attack her.

It’s yhe stimulus we have been promised

In response to Col Corrigan, Sir I’m probably just a one time mud grunt who doesn’t really know anything but in comparable usage to tonnage between Air Force One and Marine One as well as specific mission needs and security concerns the issue of the number of rotor craft becomes minor. Air Force One travel with a minimum of two C5A’s and there is always another VC-20 on stand by. The only time that doesn’t happen is in extreme circumstances. Marine One in comparison is cheap.

Yo! The V22 is the best choice for the Presidential fleet. Like me, the current fleet is old worn out, and “expendable”.

With all due respect to those who think a small fleet of these helos will do the job, or that privatising the fleet will solve the problem, I think they have not given adequate thought to the security and communications functions these aircraft perform. These birds are essential components of our national security structure. They require greater than normal attention to maintenance than similar aircraft used for less critical missions, which means more hanger time, more rebuild time and more test time…which in turn translates into a need for more aircraft in the fleet.

In addition, these choppers do not self-deploy. That means if the President has three stops planned in three different cities, a separate set of birds may be required for each of the stops depending upon the schedule. At each stop, maintenance and testing must occur before the craft is certified to carry the President.

These aircraft must be perfect all the time, every time. Zero defects is the only standard. The Marines have been performing this mission since the Eisenhower administration. They know what they are doing. Let them perform their misson and give them the equipment they require to do it.

Semper Fi,
Dave

*required

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement