Blue Ribbon Works Son of FCS

Blue Ribbon Works Son of FCS

The Army announced today a June 15 workshop that will convene a wide range of experts to inform a “Ground Combat Vehicle Blue Ribbon Panel,” made up of senior DoD and Army leaders. They will use ideas from the workshop to produce operational concepts and requirements for new vehicles to replace the cancelled FCS vehicles.

“The Army is still in need of a vehicle that can protect soldiers, and cope with 21st century operational requirements,” said Gen. Peter Chiarelli, Army vice chief of staff, in a press release. “The blue ribbon panel will take a fresh look at these requirements including capabilities, technologies and lessons learned from the FCS program.”

A group of “distinguished participants” will be drawn from academia, think tanks, retired and active duty military — as well as program managers — to provide input on the future operating environment, platforms, anti-armor threats, research and development, future requirements and network considerations, the Army said. The Army said none of the workshop participants should have direct ties to major Pentagon contractors. The all-day workshop will be held at the National Defense University in Washington; a six-member executive committee will then meet July 15.


The workshop will consider six focus areas for vehicle development, including: the operational environment 2015–2025; platform characteristics 2015–2025; platform threats; commercial off the shelf versus research and development with an intended fielding date of 2017; realistic requirements for tomorrow; and network considerations.

“We will work to include both lessons learned from the current fight and what we’ve learned from technology and build a better vehicle,” said Army Chief Gen. George Casey. “Our goal is to move forward.”

Share |

Join the Conversation

Greg,

Do you know if this means that the ADM has been signed and delivered?

Thanks.

This could be very good as long as participants are willing to think out of the box and the outcome isn’t scripted in advance. Clearly, we need new vehicles to operate in this future combat environment.

Decisions,

Casey said this week that the ADM is expected within days. If I hear anything I will inform asap.

Thanks,

Greg

Thank you for the update.

Any time there is the phrase “Blue Ribbon” attached to anything it is suspect, especially now days.

After seeing the new Terminator movie and clips from the upcoming Transformers movie and reading DOD Buzz article on how we fight in Afghanistan I hope the committee can come up with a indestructable tank that can transform to a hovering aircraft. if we want the future then lets go for something that is really out of the box. Tiny robots and toy sugv and network links are not the answers. Apple IPODs are being used by the military to defeat the enemy now..they are using them to do tactical and isr and interrogations. Let’s hope the ribbon team has combat experience.

@ mike — while your tank/hovercraft might be well beyond today’s technology you do bring up a good point about having people who think out of the box. When I read the story I thought there should be military futurists, sci-tech writers and even video game producers and, yes, maybe Hollywood and comic book writers.

Of note is a company involved in UAV development wanted to develop a Terminator style “hunter killer” UAV because it would have a large “scary” factor to it.

We should get Dave Drake involved. Hammer’s Slammers FTW. “Booster! Mark movement!”

We don’t need some sort of hovertank, what we need is an advanced family of vehicles along the lines of what FCS promised but in a heavier weight class. These can be “future-proofed” to accept EM guns and other advanced technologies.

Light “RDF” units can use upgraded Strykers for the time being, although we could resurrect the FCS MGVs down the road for such a role.

This come from David Axe War is boring
“Future Combat Systems’, Transplanted into Old Bodies
The Pentagon has porting the sensors, network systems and other electronic “guts” developed for FCS, into the Army’s stalwart M-1 tanks, M-2 fighting vehicles and other, older designs. Hell, the Army’s already doing this, somewhat.

This was a contingency the defense industry has long planned for. In 2007, BAE Systems showed off an M-2 Bradley, hollowed out and fitted with all new insides, based on FCS gear. We’re talking all-digital comms, better sensors and a new, more compact turret mechanism, meaning much more head-room for the troops.“
“putting FCS tech into our existing vehicles may be a win-win. AS each vehicles goes to re-set they get upgrades and the FCS tech makes it to the troops. “
those are exactly my thoughs

Looks like there is yet another hearing within the SASC today regarding FCS related activities. What’s the point of these hearings without an ADM???

JohnD,

Hearings are scheduled pretty much without regard to what DoD plans to do and are much more attuned to what lawmakers are interested in and want answers about. They care about FCS and its budget season so they schedule a hearing.… From conversations with staff, I can tell you that they would LOVe to have had an ADM done in time for the hearing.

Thanks Colin. I’ve read transcripts of these hearings and it never seems like anything comes out of them. I just had to vent! I’ll stay tuned… thanks for the response.

*required

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement