<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Blue Ribbon Works Son of FCS</title> <atom:link href="http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/06/11/blue-ribbon-works-son-of-fcs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/06/11/blue-ribbon-works-son-of-fcs/</link> <description>Online Defense and Acquisition Journal</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 08:32:38 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: JohnD</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/06/11/blue-ribbon-works-son-of-fcs/comment-page-1/#comment-9217</link> <dc:creator>JohnD</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:57:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7095#comment-9217</guid> <description>Thanks Colin.  I&#039;ve read transcripts of these hearings and it never seems like anything comes out of them.  I just had to vent!  I&#039;ll stay tuned... thanks for the response.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Colin.  I’ve read transcripts of these hearings and it never seems like anything comes out of them.  I just had to vent!  I’ll stay tuned… thanks for the response.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Colin Clark</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/06/11/blue-ribbon-works-son-of-fcs/comment-page-1/#comment-9215</link> <dc:creator>Colin Clark</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:43:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7095#comment-9215</guid> <description>JohnD,Hearings are scheduled pretty much without regard to what DoD plans to do and are much more attuned to what lawmakers are interested in and want answers about. They care about FCS and its budget season so they schedule a hearing.... From conversations with staff, I can tell you that they would LOVe to have had an ADM done in time for the hearing.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JohnD,</p><p>Hearings are scheduled pretty much without regard to what DoD plans to do and are much more attuned to what lawmakers are interested in and want answers about. They care about FCS and its budget season so they schedule a hearing.… From conversations with staff, I can tell you that they would LOVe to have had an ADM done in time for the hearing.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JohnD</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/06/11/blue-ribbon-works-son-of-fcs/comment-page-1/#comment-9213</link> <dc:creator>JohnD</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:27:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7095#comment-9213</guid> <description>Looks like there is yet another hearing within the SASC today regarding FCS related activities.  What&#039;s the point of these hearings without an ADM???</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like there is yet another hearing within the SASC today regarding FCS related activities.  What’s the point of these hearings without an ADM???</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: elgatoso</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/06/11/blue-ribbon-works-son-of-fcs/comment-page-1/#comment-9153</link> <dc:creator>elgatoso</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 07:22:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7095#comment-9153</guid> <description>This come from David Axe War is boring
&quot;Future Combat Systems’, Transplanted into Old Bodies
The Pentagon has porting the sensors, network systems and other electronic “guts” developed for FCS, into the Army’s stalwart M-1 tanks, M-2 fighting vehicles and other, older designs. Hell, the Army’s already doing this, somewhat.This was a contingency the defense industry has long planned for. In 2007, BAE Systems showed off an M-2 Bradley, hollowed out and fitted with all new insides, based on FCS gear. We’re talking all-digital comms, better sensors and a new, more compact turret mechanism, meaning much more head-room for the troops.&quot;
&quot;putting FCS tech into our existing vehicles may be a win-win. AS each vehicles goes to re-set they get upgrades and the FCS tech makes it to the troops. &quot;
those are exactly my thoughs</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This come from David Axe War is boring<br
/> “Future Combat Systems’, Transplanted into Old Bodies<br
/> The Pentagon has porting the sensors, network systems and other electronic “guts” developed for FCS, into the Army’s stalwart M-1 tanks, M-2 fighting vehicles and other, older designs. Hell, the Army’s already doing this, somewhat.</p><p>This was a contingency the defense industry has long planned for. In 2007, BAE Systems showed off an M-2 Bradley, hollowed out and fitted with all new insides, based on FCS gear. We’re talking all-digital comms, better sensors and a new, more compact turret mechanism, meaning much more head-room for the troops.“<br
/> “putting FCS tech into our existing vehicles may be a win-win. AS each vehicles goes to re-set they get upgrades and the FCS tech makes it to the troops. “<br
/> those are exactly my thoughs</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ReconTeam</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/06/11/blue-ribbon-works-son-of-fcs/comment-page-1/#comment-9151</link> <dc:creator>ReconTeam</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 03:02:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7095#comment-9151</guid> <description>We don&#039;t need some sort of hovertank, what we need is an advanced family of vehicles along the lines of what FCS promised but in a heavier weight class. These can be &quot;future-proofed&quot; to accept EM guns and other advanced technologies.Light &quot;RDF&quot; units can use upgraded Strykers for the time being, although we could resurrect the FCS MGVs down the road for such a role.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We don’t need some sort of hovertank, what we need is an advanced family of vehicles along the lines of what FCS promised but in a heavier weight class. These can be “future-proofed” to accept EM guns and other advanced technologies.</p><p>Light “RDF” units can use upgraded Strykers for the time being, although we could resurrect the FCS MGVs down the road for such a role.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DensityDuck</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/06/11/blue-ribbon-works-son-of-fcs/comment-page-1/#comment-9124</link> <dc:creator>DensityDuck</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 23:59:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7095#comment-9124</guid> <description>We should get Dave Drake involved.  Hammer&#039;s Slammers FTW.  &quot;Booster!  Mark movement!&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We should get Dave Drake involved.  Hammer’s Slammers FTW.  “Booster!  Mark movement!”</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bobbymike</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/06/11/blue-ribbon-works-son-of-fcs/comment-page-1/#comment-9118</link> <dc:creator>bobbymike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 19:57:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7095#comment-9118</guid> <description>@ mike - while your tank/hovercraft might be well beyond today&#039;s technology you do bring up a good point about having people who think out of the box. When I read the story I thought there should be military futurists, sci-tech writers and even video game producers and, yes, maybe Hollywood and comic book writers.Of note is a company involved in UAV development wanted to develop a Terminator style &quot;hunter killer&quot; UAV because it would have a large &quot;scary&quot; factor to it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ mike — while your tank/hovercraft might be well beyond today’s technology you do bring up a good point about having people who think out of the box. When I read the story I thought there should be military futurists, sci-tech writers and even video game producers and, yes, maybe Hollywood and comic book writers.</p><p>Of note is a company involved in UAV development wanted to develop a Terminator style “hunter killer” UAV because it would have a large “scary” factor to it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mike</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/06/11/blue-ribbon-works-son-of-fcs/comment-page-1/#comment-9114</link> <dc:creator>mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:51:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7095#comment-9114</guid> <description>After seeing the new Terminator movie and clips from the upcoming Transformers movie and reading DOD Buzz article on how we fight in Afghanistan I hope the committee can come up with a indestructable tank that can transform to a hovering aircraft.  if we want the future then lets go for something that is really out of the box. Tiny robots and toy sugv and network links are not the answers. Apple IPODs are being used by the military to defeat the enemy now..they are using them to do tactical and isr and interrogations.  Let&#039;s hope the ribbon team has combat experience.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After seeing the new Terminator movie and clips from the upcoming Transformers movie and reading DOD Buzz article on how we fight in Afghanistan I hope the committee can come up with a indestructable tank that can transform to a hovering aircraft.  if we want the future then lets go for something that is really out of the box. Tiny robots and toy sugv and network links are not the answers. Apple IPODs are being used by the military to defeat the enemy now..they are using them to do tactical and isr and interrogations.  Let’s hope the ribbon team has combat experience.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MacMan</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/06/11/blue-ribbon-works-son-of-fcs/comment-page-1/#comment-9109</link> <dc:creator>MacMan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 17:17:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7095#comment-9109</guid> <description>Any time there is the phrase &quot;Blue Ribbon&quot; attached to anything it is suspect, especially now days.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any time there is the phrase “Blue Ribbon” attached to anything it is suspect, especially now days.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Decisions</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/06/11/blue-ribbon-works-son-of-fcs/comment-page-1/#comment-9107</link> <dc:creator>Decisions</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:25:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7095#comment-9107</guid> <description>Thank you for the update.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the update.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Greg Grant</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/06/11/blue-ribbon-works-son-of-fcs/comment-page-1/#comment-9104</link> <dc:creator>Greg Grant</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:34:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7095#comment-9104</guid> <description>Decisions,Casey said this week that the ADM is expected within days. If I hear anything I will inform asap.Thanks,Greg</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Decisions,</p><p>Casey said this week that the ADM is expected within days. If I hear anything I will inform asap.</p><p>Thanks,</p><p>Greg</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: stargazer</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/06/11/blue-ribbon-works-son-of-fcs/comment-page-1/#comment-9101</link> <dc:creator>stargazer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:16:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7095#comment-9101</guid> <description>This could be very good as long as participants are willing to think out of the box and the outcome isn&#039;t scripted in advance.  Clearly, we need new vehicles to operate in this future combat environment.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This could be very good as long as participants are willing to think out of the box and the outcome isn’t scripted in advance.  Clearly, we need new vehicles to operate in this future combat environment.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Decisions</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/06/11/blue-ribbon-works-son-of-fcs/comment-page-1/#comment-9098</link> <dc:creator>Decisions</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:13:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7095#comment-9098</guid> <description>Greg,Do you know if this means that the ADM has been signed and delivered?Thanks.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg,</p><p>Do you know if this means that the ADM has been signed and delivered?</p><p>Thanks.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 11/33 queries in 0.020 seconds using apc

Served from: cloud-milcom-web1.hspheredns.com @ 2010-03-14 12:59:48 -->