Boeing Touts Obama Export Policies

Boeing Touts Obama Export Policies

It was a bit jarring to hear Boeing’s top military salesman say the Obama administration’s export polices are looking better than they did under the Bush administration. Of course, it would be a bit jarring to hear any defense executive say any administration is looking better on arms export policies.

In a decade of covering arms exports I have rarely heard a kind word said by the defense industry about US arms export policies. So when Boeing’s Chris Raymond told reporters at a pre-Paris Air Show briefing that this administration is “more forward leaning” on arms exports, I sat up a bit straighter.

“I think we see a more active discussion on these things,” Raymond said, noting rhetoric from the Obama administration about working more closely with allies and ensuring they have the capabilities they need to work with the US.

The F-22 is the greatest single challenge on the arms export front. The so-called Obey Amendment forbids foreign sales of the plane and even bars the spending of money to analyse whether the plane could responsibly be exported. Raymond sidestepped questions about the plane, noting that Lockheed is the lead. But I know that the Japanese prime minister wrote President Obama asking for the plane before the president took the oath of office — a very bold move for Japan and a clear indication of just how hungry they are for the plane. And Sen. Daniel Inouye, chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee, appears likely to push for export to Japan.

Even if the Japanese plane costs an estimated $250 million per plane — after it is stripped of some its most sensitive techs for export — I would not be surprised if they continue their push to buy a plane that would give them a clear advantage over both China and North Korea.

Raymond almost undermined his own argument about the Obama administration’s stance when he cited the State Department approvals of C-17 sales to Australia, UK and Canada, which as Jim Wolf of Reuters noted, were approved by the Bush administration. But Raymond is clearly looking ahead, and he cited combatant commander conversations about cooperating with allies and a focus by the Obama administration on the Middle East and “building partnerships…”

With the Paris Air Show starting on Monday, these comments are sure to be a staple of conversation in the chalets, as NATO allies continue to try and pry open the massive American market. Of course, the Russians and Chinese will also be watching the US stance on arms exports since they rely on foreign sales as important foreign policy tools and tend to be just a bit less restrictive in the levels of technology and capability they will sell to their bestest friends.

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Join the Conversation

The GEIA vision conference in October 08 had an Obama spokesman make some bold statements regarding US export laws, in particular how the Obama administration would like to significantly reform ITAR, calling it a relic of the cold war.

And just how are they planning on reforming the ITAR? I seriously doubt they’ve read the ITAR (22cfr120-130). I enforce it for a living and it is nice to have the teeth that it has.
I’m not holding my breath that they will do a better job then has been done in the past.

ALL
The problem with listening to the OBNA Rhetoric, regardless of subject, is that the language is tailored to the listener. If the subject is DOD Tech Exports and the talker senses a vote out there, then the rhetoric is adjusted.
Listen close, BUT watch the actual directed, dedicated and closely monitored moves made by the various DOD agencies. The OBNA now has control down to the cubicle level, and that is where the decisions are made. Rhetoric, sensed positive or negative vibes are pure OBNA Aesopian language. Beware the talk, watch the actions.
end

Damn, no wonder most of our allies have no airlift capacity. Yes! Let them buy the planes. Its a no brainer…and yes I would sell the F-22 to the Japanese-WITH all the goodies. F– the Chi-coms and the NK’s. We NEED capable alllies.

Japan for the F-22,Israel needs the F-22 as a deterrent . But that will never happen under Obama.

*required

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement