New Tactics, Combined Ops for Afghanistan

New Tactics, Combined Ops for Afghanistan

The military is taking new ways of fighting, learned on Iraq’s battlefields, to Afghanistan. The new approach combines troops operating in distributed teams on the ground supported by vast numbers of aerial drones, satellites, precision weapons and spies working informants, according to Gen. David Petraeus.

“This is the answer,” the Central Command chief said before an overflow crowd yesterday at the annual CNAS conference in Washington, “This is how we fight, when we can, with all of the assets that we have.” While acknowledging that the rural and mountainous Afghan landscape is very different from Iraq’s concentrated urban battle zones, to counter the “Pashtun insurgency,” the military is trying to replicate the same operational approach that proved highly effective in battling a shadowy enemy in Iraq.

He showed a slide depicting a snap shot of the fighting in Sadr City in April 2008, and contrasted the new way of fighting in that battle with the old way of fighting as exemplified by the 2004 battles in Fallujah. To root out entrenched guerrillas there, Marines and soldiers were forced to fight street-by-street and house-to-house, and in the process, particularly in the case of the Marines, suffered heavy casualties and leveled much of the city.

The Sadr city offensive was very different, using precision firepower and targeted raids based on accurate human and electronic intelligence. In spring 2008, the Mahdi Army and other Shiite militia launched counterattacks in Baghdad in response to the U.S. and Iraqi offensive to root out Shiite militias in the southern city of, Basra. They attacked the Green Zone and other targets around Baghdad, primarily with rockets, from inside Sadr City.

American commanders responded with a high-low mix of special operations and regular troops on the ground conducting targeted raids and aggressive sniping, supported by a fantastic array of electronic eyes overhead, and a network of spies and informants in the shadows. Petraeus listed the assets that supported soldiers, tanks, Bradleys and Strykers in the streets and alleys: 11 UAVs overhead 24 hours a day including armed Predators, 3 each Shadows and Ravens, a special intelligence drone, a SOF drone, satellites, fire-finder radars ringing the city, surveillance blimps, cameras atop towers, SEAL sniper teams and CIA spies. In three weeks, they destroyed 77 rocket teams and took out about 780 militia fighters, Petraeus said.

“We’re shifting these kinds of assets to Afghanistan,” he said, “we’re taking those lessons from Iraq and trying to apply them in Afghanistan.” The focus of the U.S. counteroffensive in Afghanistan is the Pashtun insurgency, Petraeus said, based in Kandahar and Helmand provinces where U.S. troops are now flowing. The newly appointed American commander in Afghanistan, Gen. Stanley McChrystal, will have a much larger force to battle the insurgents than did his predecessor Gen. McKiernan. U.S. troop strength there is rising from the 31,000 troops at the end of last year to what will be nearly 68,000 by the fall.

An additional Combat Aviation Brigade is being sent to Kandahar, which, along with the Marine aircraft, doubles the number of helicopters in Afghanistan; Petraeus said it increases by six-fold the number of helicopters available for combat operations because so many of the helicopters there now are tasked with the medevac mission. The Marine Expeditionary Brigade is going into Helmand province, which is being prepped for their arrival by special operations forces. The Stryker brigade, just now arriving, will go to Kandahar. A brigade from the 82nd, beefed up with additional junior officers and NCOs, will be scattered about to provide advisers for Afghan military and police units, again primarily in the south.

The paratroopers will hopefully help address what Petraeus said is the biggest challenge at the moment: trying to rapidly build the Afghan army. Finding good Afghan division, brigade and battalion commanders along with large numbers of field grades to provide needed field staff is proving particularly difficult. Producing those leaders will take years of experience, education and training, he said.

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Join the Conversation

Buddalovespaine,

There are other blogs that can accept your
rant. I would like to think that you could stay on topic or read your comics quietly to yourself.

Fallujah to Sadr City. Sadr City ops should have happened at Fallujah. I could not stand to see the USMC being pulled out of the city. Any comment why it was fought the way it was?

The mountain people of the Vietnam highlands were trained by Green Berets. The Viet Cong raided their villages for plunder, food and young men simliar to what the Taliban has done in Afghanistan. It took around 8 weeks, but they still did not like to go out on patrol until they understood the need for them in order to defend their village. Village radios and combined defense of the local villages worked.

If you look at the success ratios of LRRP’s, SEALS and Force Recon in Vietnam, you start to wonder why it is that Commanders were so reluctant to build on their success. If you were able to get actionable intelligence based on captured enemy soldiers and the subsequent ambush was successful, you were probably going back to the same LZ even though it was full of Charlie waiting to bite your ass. Sometimes this was done 3 or 4 times in a row. These actions were in Laos and Cambodia and cut secret supply lines and infiltration routes before they could get to Vietnam.

What has to happen in Afghanistan may be happening but it is surely in the hands of the Commanders to use their resources effectively. Do not get jealous of someone else’s success since it only helps the fight. Sounds simply but is it really?

Afganistan broke the back of the USSR. It will surely do the sme to the USA.

Learned from history. correct it. Don’t repeats the same mistake taken from previous predecessors. Tactics will be difference or approach. USSR came in 1979 with the mission to established Communism in Afghanistan and all the people in that country revolts again the government and USSR. Its totally difference scenarios and times. US government must first win the heart and mind of the people there. stop bombing discriminately . it only cause resentment towards US soldiers.

JFC, not only is the US not in any position to give others moral lessons, when US leaders need moral lessons so badly themselves, its leadership is in no position to give tactical lessons either.
If I had even 10% of the resources that are available to the US military, in 6 months I could build a military that could defeat the US military in 6 minutes and that is even with giving the US the advantage of being able to attack first. No Nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons would be necessary either.
Any one who would delete some of my comments while not deleting others so that they can not be read in context has got to be a real chicken.
By the way 2 Rosas stopped in today to say hello. They are on their way to Tibet by way of Damascus. They offered me a sling shot but I had to turn them down. Gozt to run.

“Afganistan broke the back of the USSR. It will surely do the sme to the USA.”

When the Afganistan “Broke the back” of the USSR alot of money was given to Afganistan by the US gouvernement to help defend their nation. They will not receive this funding now to use against the Us military.

Information Operations and Intellegence is always the key to winning in the COIN environment. It is not about winning “hearts and minds” it is about assisting people to meet their basic needs inorder to raise their families. It is also about ensuring the established government of that country is trusted, sovern and just, it does not have to be a patterned democracy like the US, their culture is different and our goals and expectations need to be taylored based on those differences. The General is right, use all assets available and target the enemy, minimize colateral damage and continue to support the needs of the ligitimate government and good people in that country, that is why we are successful in Iraq and that is how we will win in Afghanistan.

I really wish the media wouldn’t ask the brass how we’re going to beat the enemy, because the brass are dumb enough to tell them and then it’s put into print for our enemy to decipher and adapt to. For once people, learn what OPSEC is intended for!

Further more, I don’t care wht tactics are used to beat the little 8ast@rd$ as long as it works.

Now, those of you in positions of knowing and authority: shut your mouths so we can finish this thing.

One key to winning in Afghanistan is to force our NATO and Arab Gulf coalition partners to stop just PROMISING support and to actually deliver it. The USG should quietly arrange for the various promises from each nation to be publicized, along with the equipment and people in Afghanistan actually sent to date. We are going to need LOTS of friendly troops to help us train, patrol, supply and support US, Afghan and Coalition troops in that terrain. The Taliban and Al Qaida are threats to ALL civilized nations and it is time other countries, besides the US, the UK and a few others, stood up and were counted instead of hanging back, waiting for others to commit and invest. It is gut-check time in AF-PAK.

I really ain’t counting on our NATO “allies” to really engage the enemy and fight. There are French, Dutch, Canadian, Brit, Lith, Estonians who really do fight. Sorry if I missed any, don’t mean to offend. But, this is the TRUTH. Now, Fallujah couldn’t be avoided, I don’t think we had the assets in place for the same kind of battle in Sadr City. That is really Kick-azz tactics and strategy. Could we have avoided the urban warfare of fallujah? I don’t think so. I agree with Mack, the threat is not realized fully by the West. Wat is the goal of the Jihadist;s? Its the spread of islam by any means neccesary. We are in a war with people who want to turn back the clock to 700AD. Europe is in danger of being outpopulated by moslems. Look at the birthrates. That is a story for another day, but check it.

*required

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement