Paris Opera and JSF F-136

Paris Opera and JSF F-136

Sharp dress uniforms and gorgeous Parisian confections known as dresses dotted the crowd as I strolled through the press of aerospace executives, military officers, wives and nieces at United Technologies’ Paris Air Show gala at the sumptuous Paris Opera.

Champagne flowed, the loggia was packed and the tour guide explaining the Chagall ceiling was tres charmant. But the big buckets of cash spent making the evening such a hit were dispensed in part for a very serious purpose — beating back the GE/Rolls Royce engine program for the Joint Strike Fighter.

While the whole evening wasn’t put on just to ensure Pratt & Whitney gets all the gold spent on the JSF engine program, that was the only topic mentioned by a company representative we spoke with. And company officials are publicly pushing that line here at the Paris Air Show.


The Pentagon already sides with P&W. So it is on Capitol Hill where the battle will be won or lost. The battle has been waged with sharp elbows. Sen. Joe Lieberman, a good friend to P&W, restated his opposition to the second engine program earlier this month from his perch as chairman of the Senate Armed Services airland subcommittee. But bipartisan support in both chambers has ensured that the second engine program has been every year in spite of opposition from the Pentagon and from Lieberman.

Given the strong support from both authorizers and appropriators I think P&W’s party at the Opera will leave many with a warm glow — and probably help generate some new business leads — but I think GE and Rolls Royce will win congressional funding because Congress fears the possible ramifications of a significant technical failure or delay to JSF. Lawmakers would rather spend more for peace of mind, even in a tough budget environment.

Join the Conversation

How do I get invited to parties like that!!!

I would say to Mr. Lieberman et al, that based on track record alone, P/W is a poor choice for engines. My 2 cents comes from 26 years of wrenching on their junk iron. The greatest advance in military A/C engines was in buying GE.
Too bad we couldn’t build the A4-SU (like Singapore) instead of that A7 throwaway trash preceding the F/A 18.

America’s strength was her manufacturing and engineering base. We should never depart too far from our strength—independence. Vision and determination will determine this engine issue.

ADC M D Keller — You must be kidding. As a retired aircraft engine mechanic who worked for Pratt & Whitney for 40 yrs. primarily on military engines, I’ve heard nothing but glowing reports from airforce pilots and mechanics who fly and maintain those dependable engines. After the Kuwait invasion, when those F-15’s and F-16’s returned for overhaul, the quality of those F100 engines was quite apparent. We removed a lot of sand from those engines and the performance and integrity of the engine parts was amazing. History reveals that during WWII, pilots relied on Pratt engines to get them home. Our main competitor, GE builds disposible engines — two for the price of one. Thats why most F-16’s equipped with GE are grounded most of the time. Granted, not everything is perfect all of the time, but, the record speaks for itself. PRATT and WHITNEY — DEPENDABLE ENGINES; it’s on our logo and it stands for what we do best — building and maintaining the best military and commercial jet aircraft engines in the world.

The people supporting the single engine option are conventiently forgetting that this program started out as a two engine solution. When the UK bought into the project it was on that basis. Now part way through after we have sunk Millions of GBP into the R&D on the project, now it is all right to turn round and change the rules of the game and stick it to your closest ally ?? I think not !

*required

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement