Up and Away for the Airborne

Up and Away for the Airborne

Yemen has seen the future of airborne training, and it is in the past.

When Yemeni officials went to Dubai to watch a tethered balloon carry tourists and locals 300 meters – almost 1,000 feet – into the air they saw a relatively cheap way to expose their airborne-soldier wannabes to parachuting, said Mattieu Gobbi, director general and co-founder of Aerophile, the Paris-based manufacturer of the balloon.

And that’s just what they’ve been doing since March, when Gobbi’s company set up the army’s balloon in the desert just a few miles from the Red Sea port city of Hodeidah.

“The troops need to be trained [to jump] from a plane … At the end of the day the operational skill is to be able to jump from a plane,” said Gotti, who knows that from experience, having served in the French airborne. But Yemen, and some other countries that he has been talking with — France, Portugal, Egypt and Saudi Arabia — estimate they can cut their airplane jump training by half.

So far he has had no contact with the U.S. Army, but obviously he would like to.

Cost benefits, alone, at a time of tightening budgets, would appear incentive enough to explore balloon jumping. Every jump that can be made without a plane is a jump without fuel costs or wear and tear on an aircraft. Annual operating costs of a balloon jump station is about $250,000 a year — that includes an operating team of three, maintenance and helium. Over the course of 25,000 jumps, he said, that means $22 per jump.

The other benefit is that a balloon is green — no carbon footprint to speak off.

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Join the Conversation

Good idea… but jumping from a static ballon and a moving aircraft is totally different experience.. Sure is better than those static towers im sure! (not even sure if they use those anymore). If you could mix the two im sure it would work out to reduce the costs..

Sure ‚it is an option,but not exactly realistic,you need to feel that slipstream,and get buffeted around,to see your buddies below you,smell that fuel smell,feel the wind,the noise,the prop blast,if someone could duplicate all of this,then they would have a real winner.

it would make a fine first boot camp jump training course, low stress, calm easy jump and focus on landing right :D once the landing sklls and manuvering around is learnt, then the next stage is the more expensive plane based jumps.

For those of you unfamiliar with the history of the Airborne this is an old, very old, concept. The British first used ballons in the Second World War because of a shortage of suitable airframes and continued to use them post-war. During the 70’s the concept was explored here in the United States because of the fuel crisis and the difficulty in obtaining aircraft for training the reserve component airborne units.

We’ll save the planet, but lose the war.

I agree with Ruckim, nothing more exciting than jumping out of a perfectly working aircraft! Hooah! “ASA Lives!”

*required

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement