<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Tanker Testing Missile Detector</title> <atom:link href="http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/06/17/tanker-testing-rpg-detector/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/06/17/tanker-testing-rpg-detector/</link> <description>Online Defense and Acquisition Journal</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 02:32:28 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Greg Grant</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/06/17/tanker-testing-rpg-detector/comment-page-1/#comment-9299</link> <dc:creator>Greg Grant</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:04:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7357#comment-9299</guid> <description>Cole,Luckily, MANPADS are fairly sensitive instruments and tend to degrade if not properly cared for, even the sturdier Russian versions. They also are rather more conspicuous than RPGs and are harder to transport or transact.However, the mere threat of insurgents in the area having MANPADS is enough. During the bad years in Iraq, 2004-2007, officers complained about having to send a big chunk of their unit to go conduct counter-MANPAD patrols beneath the flight path at Baghdad International. Big planes are particularly vulnerable during take off and landing.Greg</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cole,</p><p>Luckily, MANPADS are fairly sensitive instruments and tend to degrade if not properly cared for, even the sturdier Russian versions. They also are rather more conspicuous than RPGs and are harder to transport or transact.</p><p>However, the mere threat of insurgents in the area having MANPADS is enough. During the bad years in Iraq, 2004–2007, officers complained about having to send a big chunk of their unit to go conduct counter-MANPAD patrols beneath the flight path at Baghdad International. Big planes are particularly vulnerable during take off and landing.</p><p>Greg</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alex</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/06/17/tanker-testing-rpg-detector/comment-page-1/#comment-9285</link> <dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 06:14:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7357#comment-9285</guid> <description>Cole, I imagine the tanker needs the countermeasures for takeoff and landing.  MANPADs won&#039;t be a threat at altitude.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cole, I imagine the tanker needs the countermeasures for takeoff and landing.  MANPADs won’t be a threat at altitude.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mike j</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/06/17/tanker-testing-rpg-detector/comment-page-1/#comment-9283</link> <dc:creator>mike j</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 05:43:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7357#comment-9283</guid> <description>A-10 also hides the exhausts over the tail, and is tough enough to take the hit from a manpad.  Hell, it&#039;s tough enough to take an SA-6.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A-10 also hides the exhausts over the tail, and is tough enough to take the hit from a manpad.  Hell, it’s tough enough to take an SA-6.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Cole</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/06/17/tanker-testing-rpg-detector/comment-page-1/#comment-9266</link> <dc:creator>Cole</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 01:44:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7357#comment-9266</guid> <description>Greg are you Bryant?:) I don&#039;t think you would have made that mistake.SA-7, SA-14, SA-16, and SA-18 are much harder to access, and require greater training than an RPG. Only low-flying helicopters need fear unguided RPGs and then only if bad guys are lucky or fire massed volleys or both.Is the KC-135R going to get the large aircraft IR countermeasures of the C-17 or the Apache system which I doubt weighs 500 lbs??Does this mean they will routinely land KC-135R near insurgents? Don&#039;t they normally fly high enough to avoid MANPAD? If not, why not?Does this mean the USAF will deliver fuel to the Army/Marines at times?;) I&#039;m kind of amazed if the A-10 lacks IR countermeasures other than flares!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg are you Bryant?:) I don’t think you would have made that mistake.</p><p>SA-7, SA-14, SA-16, and SA-18 are much harder to access, and require greater training than an RPG. Only low-flying helicopters need fear unguided RPGs and then only if bad guys are lucky or fire massed volleys or both.</p><p>Is the KC-135R going to get the large aircraft IR countermeasures of the C-17 or the Apache system which I doubt weighs 500 lbs??</p><p>Does this mean they will routinely land KC-135R near insurgents? Don’t they normally fly high enough to avoid MANPAD? If not, why not?</p><p>Does this mean the USAF will deliver fuel to the Army/Marines at times?;) I’m kind of amazed if the A-10 lacks IR countermeasures other than flares!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Greg Grant</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/06/17/tanker-testing-rpg-detector/comment-page-1/#comment-9264</link> <dc:creator>Greg Grant</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 01:18:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7357#comment-9264</guid> <description>Alex,You are so very right.Thanks,Greg</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex,</p><p>You are so very right.</p><p>Thanks,</p><p>Greg</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alex</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/06/17/tanker-testing-rpg-detector/comment-page-1/#comment-9262</link> <dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 23:17:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7357#comment-9262</guid> <description>Yes.  An RPG is a grenade with wings, a MANPAD is a portable missile :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes.  An RPG is a grenade with wings, a MANPAD is a portable missile <img
src='http://www.dodbuzz.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: doc75</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/06/17/tanker-testing-rpg-detector/comment-page-1/#comment-9258</link> <dc:creator>doc75</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:58:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7357#comment-9258</guid> <description>Umm, I could be wrong but isn&#039;t there a difference between a MANPAD and an RPG</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm, I could be wrong but isn’t there a difference between a MANPAD and an RPG</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 11/26 queries in 0.040 seconds using apc

Served from: cloud-milcom-web1.hspheredns.com @ 2010-03-17 00:40:55 -->