<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: SASC OKs More F-22s</title> <atom:link href="http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/06/25/sasc-oks-more-f-22s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/06/25/sasc-oks-more-f-22s/</link> <description>Online Defense and Acquisition Journal</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:34:12 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Bobby Crittenden</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/06/25/sasc-oks-more-f-22s/#comment-15887</link> <dc:creator>Bobby Crittenden</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:20:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7541#comment-15887</guid> <description>When will the 2010 Compensation Rates for Disabled Veteran Service Connected be published. and it they are where can I find them. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When will the 2010 Compensation Rates for Disabled Veteran Service Connected be published. and it they are where can I find them.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bambooviper</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/06/25/sasc-oks-more-f-22s/#comment-9765</link> <dc:creator>Bambooviper</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 21:46:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7541#comment-9765</guid> <description>My thought is this, take the 100 richest people from all countries, give them 7 days supply of food, each an M-16, 5 magazines, 1000 rounds of 5.62. 10 frags, 1 clamore, 1 law, 1 set of used jungle utilitys. 1 new pait of socks and boots, fly them into a jungle with,tigers,poisonist snakes, malaria, wild bore, and every other kind of death around the corner, huvor 15ft over the elephant grass and tell them to jump out as they are being shot at. Then they can all try to kill each other while trying to servive the elements, don&#039;t resupply them for 11 days. Have fantoms and gunships blowing every part of the jungle apart, drop naplam in their laps, have spooky come by at 3AM and shoot bursts in front of them, make them carry their died and wounded for days, while hoping to reach a place to get them evact out. Let the working class watch and say, Oh our poor rich guys. Then after a few years whoever is left, bring them home and we can call them names and hit &#039;em with roitton tomatoes and eggs, and give them a 50% disability rating after 40 years and a pretty blue ribbon with a gold boarder on it as a feel good prize, then they will get this war thing out of their system. Before you say that is dumb, they did it to me.BV</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My thought is this, take the 100 richest people from all countries, give them 7 days supply of food, each an M-16, 5 magazines, 1000 rounds of 5.62. 10 frags, 1 clamore, 1 law, 1 set of used jungle utilitys. 1 new pait of socks and boots, fly them into a jungle with,tigers,poisonist snakes, malaria, wild bore, and every other kind of death around the corner, huvor 15ft over the elephant grass and tell them to jump out as they are being shot at. Then they can all try to kill each other while trying to servive the elements, don’t resupply them for 11 days. Have fantoms and gunships blowing every part of the jungle apart, drop naplam in their laps, have spooky come by at 3AM and shoot bursts in front of them, make them carry their died and wounded for days, while hoping to reach a place to get them evact out. Let the working class watch and say, Oh our poor rich guys. Then after a few years whoever is left, bring them home and we can call them names and hit ‘em with roitton tomatoes and eggs, and give them a 50% disability rating after 40 years and a pretty blue ribbon with a gold boarder on it as a feel good prize, then they will get this war thing out of their system. Before you say that is dumb, they did it to me.BV</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: A Friend</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/06/25/sasc-oks-more-f-22s/#comment-9760</link> <dc:creator>A Friend</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 18:13:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7541#comment-9760</guid> <description>Jason, exactly.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason, exactly.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jason</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/06/25/sasc-oks-more-f-22s/#comment-9746</link> <dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 08:12:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7541#comment-9746</guid> <description>I say, sell the F-22&#039;s to Israil, Japan, and Australia. It will keep the lines open, and make future purchases for the USAF much, much cheaper. And wasn&#039;t the President&#039;s moto, strength in Allie numbers?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say, sell the F-22’s to Israil, Japan, and Australia. It will keep the lines open, and make future purchases for the USAF much, much cheaper. And wasn’t the President’s moto, strength in Allie numbers?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chief K, USAF</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/06/25/sasc-oks-more-f-22s/#comment-9735</link> <dc:creator>Chief K, USAF</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 01:55:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7541#comment-9735</guid> <description>In my opinion, lobbyists control Congress and the F-22, the world’s greatest air superiority fifth generation fighter, and its demise…it may have had some promising news today, but it will die on the Senate floor in two weeks because of the veto threat from the administration.The “problem” is that the F-22 is being fielded during an unconventional war with a Democratic administration and Congress. It was designed and initially produced with the belief that its production line never being shut down due to politics i.e. voters and white collar jobs. We live in a current news cycle society fueled with Twitter driven by national and international perceptions and polls. These perceptions and polls drive the administration’s defense acquisition policies (along with the voting majority power in Congress and their pay back for the last eight years on the sidelines).The current battlefield engagement strategy determines the future of defense acquisitions (look at our history and you’ll see something familiar). We’ll see how the Quadrennial Defense Review’s recommendations will be written to support the current administration’s defense acquisition strategic plan i.e. cheaper systems. Defense spending will dramatically decrease once we are out of Iraq. A smaller force will continue to kill “Taliban” fighters in Afghanistan to keep the polls in the positive.I’m not a proponent of the F-22 or F-35 simply because we have the technology to build stealthy unmanned platforms that would be capable of surpassing any of the F-22’s capabilities. The F-35 is desired by the current administration and Congress because it can be sold for a profit to other nations. Any profits in this current recession would help pay for national healthcare and other proposed socialized programs.Unfortunately for the fighter pilot community, computers and satellites are the future of conventional and unconventional aerial warfare. Range, speed, duration, maintenance, capability, performance and COST are significantly enhanced over manned systems due to the survival systems required for these manned platforms. The Reaper unmanned aerial killing machine is the concept of an unmanned fifth generation fighter that should be developed instead of the manned F-22 or F-35 aircraft.Nuclear deterrence died after the cold war and the axis of evil nations are not deterred by the F-22 or “Shock and awe” bombing campaigns. Iran and Nk continue to thumb their nose at us because of the administration’s reaction to France’s polls and perceptions. They are however, “scared” to death of the Reaper though…in my opinion.Check six.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion, lobbyists control Congress and the F-22, the world’s greatest air superiority fifth generation fighter, and its demise…it may have had some promising news today, but it will die on the Senate floor in two weeks because of the veto threat from the administration.</p><p>The “problem” is that the F-22 is being fielded during an unconventional war with a Democratic administration and Congress. It was designed and initially produced with the belief that its production line never being shut down due to politics i.e. voters and white collar jobs. We live in a current news cycle society fueled with Twitter driven by national and international perceptions and polls. These perceptions and polls drive the administration’s defense acquisition policies (along with the voting majority power in Congress and their pay back for the last eight years on the sidelines).</p><p>The current battlefield engagement strategy determines the future of defense acquisitions (look at our history and you’ll see something familiar). We’ll see how the Quadrennial Defense Review’s recommendations will be written to support the current administration’s defense acquisition strategic plan i.e. cheaper systems. Defense spending will dramatically decrease once we are out of Iraq. A smaller force will continue to kill “Taliban” fighters in Afghanistan to keep the polls in the positive.</p><p>I’m not a proponent of the F-22 or F-35 simply because we have the technology to build stealthy unmanned platforms that would be capable of surpassing any of the F-22’s capabilities. The F-35 is desired by the current administration and Congress because it can be sold for a profit to other nations. Any profits in this current recession would help pay for national healthcare and other proposed socialized programs.</p><p>Unfortunately for the fighter pilot community, computers and satellites are the future of conventional and unconventional aerial warfare. Range, speed, duration, maintenance, capability, performance and COST are significantly enhanced over manned systems due to the survival systems required for these manned platforms. The Reaper unmanned aerial killing machine is the concept of an unmanned fifth generation fighter that should be developed instead of the manned F-22 or F-35 aircraft.</p><p>Nuclear deterrence died after the cold war and the axis of evil nations are not deterred by the F-22 or “Shock and awe” bombing campaigns. Iran and Nk continue to thumb their nose at us because of the administration’s reaction to France’s polls and perceptions. They are however, “scared” to death of the Reaper though…in my opinion.</p><p>Check six.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Zach</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/06/25/sasc-oks-more-f-22s/#comment-9733</link> <dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 01:45:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7541#comment-9733</guid> <description>Chris, You don&#039;t agree with giving our trusted KEY allies technology that will make them be counters to countries that don&#039;t like us, or even hate us? Like Japan, they want F-22&#039;s and can counter China, and North Korea. Along with anyone else that pops up in that area.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, You don’t agree with giving our trusted KEY allies technology that will make them be counters to countries that don’t like us, or even hate us? Like Japan, they want F-22’s and can counter China, and North Korea. Along with anyone else that pops up in that area.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/06/25/sasc-oks-more-f-22s/#comment-9730</link> <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 01:09:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7541#comment-9730</guid> <description>Why did the DoD even want to stop the production of F-22s? This administration is spending billions on completely useless stuff, but wants to cut our development of the aircraft that would long guarantee our supremacy in the air? Also, what&#039;s with the coming up with an F-22 variation to sell to other countries? If we&#039;re going to make them, we might as well use them!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why did the DoD even want to stop the production of F-22s? This administration is spending billions on completely useless stuff, but wants to cut our development of the aircraft that would long guarantee our supremacy in the air? Also, what’s with the coming up with an F-22 variation to sell to other countries? If we’re going to make them, we might as well use them!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Drake</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/06/25/sasc-oks-more-f-22s/#comment-9722</link> <dc:creator>Drake</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 17:19:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7541#comment-9722</guid> <description>Looks like put up or shut up time for the President. Congressional Democrats do not seem to be too concerned about a White House veto, when you hear comments like this from Rep. Neil Abercrombie, D-Hawaii,&quot;Rep. Neil Abercrombie, D-Hawaii, said June 18 that a presidential veto of the $680 billion spending bill is virtually out of the question.”&quot;Does anybody seriously believe, given that we have troops in the field in two wars and the possibility of other deployments that may come up, that people in this country would put up with a veto?” Abercrombie asked. Besides, “it would be overridden in a nanosecond,” he said.&quot;The idea that the President can deal with his own party with kid gloves, and just hope to win them over  by the strength of his charisma is going to be tested real soon on a variety of legislative fronts.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like put up or shut up time for the President. Congressional Democrats do not seem to be too concerned about a White House veto, when you hear comments like this from Rep. Neil Abercrombie, D-Hawaii,</p><p>“Rep. Neil Abercrombie, D-Hawaii, said June 18 that a presidential veto of the $680 billion spending bill is virtually out of the question.”</p><p>“Does anybody seriously believe, given that we have troops in the field in two wars and the possibility of other deployments that may come up, that people in this country would put up with a veto?” Abercrombie asked. Besides, “it would be overridden in a nanosecond,” he said.”</p><p>The idea that the President can deal with his own party with kid gloves, and just hope to win them over  by the strength of his charisma is going to be tested real soon on a variety of legislative fronts.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Phillips</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/06/25/sasc-oks-more-f-22s/#comment-9715</link> <dc:creator>Phillips</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:07:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7541#comment-9715</guid> <description>Washington Times published an F-22 Op-Ed: http://washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jun/26/hill-battle-for-the-f-22/</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Washington Times published an F-22 Op-Ed:<br /> <a href="http://washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jun/26/hill-battle-for-the-f-22/" rel="nofollow">http://washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jun/26/hill-battle-for-the-f-22/</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Zach</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/06/25/sasc-oks-more-f-22s/#comment-9700</link> <dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 09:37:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7541#comment-9700</guid> <description>Love they are going to keep making F-22&#039;s. But not sure what to make of the FCS howitzer, do they mean they want the FCS version? Or that the new army vehicle program is required to make a howitzer?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love they are going to keep making F-22’s. But not sure what to make of the FCS howitzer, do they mean they want the FCS version? Or that the new army vehicle program is required to make a howitzer?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.007 seconds using apc
Object Caching 706/707 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.dodbuzz.com

Served from: dodbuzz.com @ 2012-02-09 00:49:24 -->
