Comments on: StratCom Plows Ahead on Cyber http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/06/29/stratcom-plows-ahead-on-cyber/ Online Defense and Acquisition Journal Sun, 14 Mar 2010 03:04:40 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Danielhttp://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/06/29/stratcom-plows-ahead-on-cyber/comment-page-1/#comment-9823 Daniel Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:36:37 +0000 http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7556#comment-9823 I believe that the next war will in fact be fought as much with ones and zeroes as with armor and explosive power. The Chinese have a robust cyber warfare arm and- being the owner of a digital ad agency, I can tell you that there are more incredibly talented coders in places like Russia and The Ukraine than there are in Europe.Not be an alarmist. But this move to solidify our digital weaponry is not just good news, it's as important as any weapon system in existence.Daniel Civilianmilitaryintelligencegroup.com I believe that the next war will in fact be fought as much with ones and zeroes as with armor and explosive power. The Chinese have a robust cyber warfare arm and– being the owner of a digital ad agency, I can tell you that there are more incredibly talented coders in places like Russia and The Ukraine than there are in Europe.

Not be an alarmist. But this move to solidify our digital weaponry is not just good news, it’s as important as any weapon system in existence.

Daniel
Civilianmilitaryintelligencegroup.com

]]> By: bobbymikehttp://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/06/29/stratcom-plows-ahead-on-cyber/comment-page-1/#comment-9821 bobbymike Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:26:08 +0000 http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7556#comment-9821 I like Gen Kevin Chilton. He is a tireless advocate of the nuclear deterrent mission. I would prefer he concentrate on modernizing the nuclear weapons infrastructure and delivery system infrastructure. We need the RRW, NGB and a MMIII replacement. Also the nuclear labs should explore advanced weapons concepts to avoid technological surprise. I like Gen Kevin Chilton. He is a tireless advocate of the nuclear deterrent mission. I would prefer he concentrate on modernizing the nuclear weapons infrastructure and delivery system infrastructure. We need the RRW, NGB and a MMIII replacement. Also the nuclear labs should explore advanced weapons concepts to avoid technological surprise.

]]> By: Brian Whttp://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/06/29/stratcom-plows-ahead-on-cyber/comment-page-1/#comment-9817 Brian W Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:25:48 +0000 http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7556#comment-9817 There is no controversy here between the 2 4-stars as I see it. Cyber Command is going to be a force provider to STRATCOM who is the warfighter. This is no different than the USAF which is a force provider to STRATCOM for space and to CENTCOM for airplanes to use in OIF/OEF.So as the warfighter it's up to STRATCOM to lay out its needs and requirements for this mission. And then it will be up to CYBERCOM to take those requirements and go off and procure systems and train people to then provide to STRATCOM to do the mission. There is no controversy here between the 2 4-stars as I see it. Cyber Command is going to be a force provider to STRATCOM who is the warfighter. This is no different than the USAF which is a force provider to STRATCOM for space and to CENTCOM for airplanes to use in OIF/OEF.

So as the warfighter it’s up to STRATCOM to lay out its needs and requirements for this mission. And then it will be up to CYBERCOM to take those requirements and go off and procure systems and train people to then provide to STRATCOM to do the mission.

]]>