OMB Halts Reset Upgrades

OMB Halts Reset Upgrades

“I want to help you,” cried an exasperated Rep. Neil Abercrombie as he pressed the Army vice chief of staff today to explain whether the Army needed more money for equipment upgrades in the 2010 b udget because of the fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan. Army Gen. Peter Chiarelli said again and again that the Army had enough money in the 2010 budget request for overseas contingency funding to rebuild and refit equipment. Then Chiarelli said that OMB would not allow overseas contingency money to be spent on equipment upgrades.

You could almost see Defense Secretary Robert Gates’ spirit peering over Chiarelli’s shoulder as he got louder and louder in response to Abercrombie’s pressure. Pressed hard by Abercrombie, Chiarelli finally said: “I think it makes a lot of sense to upgrade when we can.… but the new rules are that we cannot do those upgrades.” At least one observer voiced sympathy during the hearing for Chiarelli’s difficult position — between a defense secretary and a senior lawmaker.

Abercrombie told several reporters after the hearing — as he hustled to the Capitol for a vote — that he had heard for a while about some sort of restriction on equipment upgrades but had not had the rumor confirmed. Well, the House Armed Services Committee got it confirmed today that there is new executive branch rule — or policy — or guidance — or something — from OMB that forbids the services from doing equipment upgrades with Overseas Contingency Operations money.

As Abercrombie noted, there is a great deal of money at stake and he threatened Chiarelli that he would take it away from the Army since he had pressing needs for billions of dollars elsewhere in the budget. If the end of the hearing was any indication, the army stands to lose a fair amount of change in the defense authorization bill if Abercrombie has his way. After all, this is what Chiarelli said just before the hearing stopped early so lawmakers could head off for a string of votes: “We think we are going to be in good shape in 2010 with the money you have so generously given us.”

But a great deal of to-ing and fro-ing will have to go on in the next week or two as lawmakers and their staff try to figure out just what OMB hath wrought and how the Congress should respond. It began at the end of today’s hearing, when Chiarelli and some Marine officers held a vigorous tête-à-tête with Abercrombie. I tried speaking with some of the Army aides to get a clearer idea of just who was doing what. They were very polite and said they didn’t know what OMB had done, adding that they would wait for their boss and for Congress to clarify the situation. While there is still a great deal to be learnt by all sides in this, Chiarelli may regret his staunch words when the bill finally passes. Sometimes speaking truth to power hurts.

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Join the Conversation

I’m a bit confused by this post. It seems as though Chiarelli is saying that the Army’s budget is big enough, when taken as a whole, to do all the upgrades that it wants. However, the OMB has declared that it can only spend a certain amount on upgrades, and that’s NOT enough to do all of them; whereas other parts have wasted space.

I’m confused too, thoughts in this post aren’t too clear to me.

Alex, DD,

I rewrote some of it to clarify. Hope this helps!

Nothing to be confused about. Barry Obama is gutting the
military. Hello Carter hollow force.

Shades of the OMB/McNamara FY ’67 fiasco.

It might help some if you would give the full name and function of OMB.

Papa Ray

Yes, that’s more clear now. So the OMB won’t let the Army take money from the “operations” pot and dump it into the “upgrades” pot? Well, that’s just business as usual, isn’t it? I mean, not that it’s SMART, but it’s standard budget practice…

Previous overseas contingency operations (OCO) supplemental funding rules allowed a certain amount of “reset” to include equipment upgrades, but the FY10 OCO rules became more restrictive to ensure war supplemental funds focused primarily on current ops, not enduring capabilities. Any procurements with OCO funds must be delivered in the year of execution.

Ah, more of Obama’s behind-the-scenes gutting of defense. Obama is a clever guy — evil, vile, and loathsome — but clever.

I think DD is correct. Can’t move money from one “bucket” to another “bucket”. Either way it looks like government is working the way it is supposed to. Congress is questioning actions made by the Executvie Branch. If anything needs to be fixed or adjusted it should get fixed.

DC2

But then Obama funded four additional F-22s with supplemental contingency funds. This was once justified as replacing lost equipment, but were four USAF jet fighters lost this past year?

But I agree, the Pentagon has been covertly expanding their budgets even more by using war funds for normal ops.

BTW, for those he don’t read much, Obama is spending more on the military that Bush had planned. The nation is going bankrupt but the Feds boost all spending and give everyone more pay raises. Hopefully, we will get a conservative president who will slash all spending and federal pay, and withdraw from these colonial wars.

Dandy, thank you man. The USAF received 18+ Billion, from the Black Budget. Funds for the R&D of the 2018 bomber, anyone!? Does anyone honestly believe the USAF and USN is struggling under Obama?! Jesus, it’s not hard to believe, just research. The DoD will receive 767+ Billion this upcoming year, and it does NOT include the Black Budget!

So, in a since, their is over 850+ Billion for ONE year! Mind you folks, we are in a DEEP FREAKING RECESSION! We should be happy we receive an 70+ billion in “overall” budget, Base, Supplemental, Black, .ect.…

Flame me if you want, I couldn’t care less, but that is the truth.

Numbers don’t lie, people do.

The Military Industrial Complex is a well fed machine. I said it once and I will say it again, the power structure, 1 being highest:

1) (International) Bankers (Wall Street)
2) Military Ind. Complex
3) President

Obama, doesn’t pull the Military strings, the bankers do.

Conspiracy Theorist, I am not, but president’s don’t know shi* about how much funding to give the Military.…

Jason: You forgot to blame–oh wait, you DID blame the International Zionist Conspiracy. But you didn’t blame Communist Agitators or Drug Criminals. Troll better next time!

i thought it was

1) evil Zionist communist drug addict bankers

2)skynet

3)military industrial complex

4) president

skynet controls the PONTUS right?

Hope and Change.

Allah Akbar!

So let’s see if I got this correct.

1) The Army feels that it has enough money allocated to both:
a) Fight the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq (that’s the ‘overseas contingency’ fund).
b) Do the desired equipment upgrades.

2) The Army WILL NOT use money from the war fund to upgrade equipment in case combat operations cost more than they currently project.

3) Since the Army has enough money Abercrombie is going to take some of it away so they won’t have enough.

4) Since the Army has what they think is a good paln and this congressman wants to screw it up Obama is an anti-American child of Satan.

Does that about cover it?

Rick –Could you tell me what Song Bird McCain and Wolf Killer Scoccer Mom Palin would have done to help this country. OK, Palin quit her job, I’ll give you that one, what else, you seem to think you are well informed.

Rick: No; it’s that the Army has enough total dollars to do those things, but only some of those dollars are in the “buy upgrades” pile. Other dollars are in the “overseas ops” pile.

Now, it so happens that overseas ops doesn’t need all of its pile. You or I might say “great, take the extra money and give it to the upgrades pile”. But money is allocated to piles based on a scientific process involving hands and butts and a good deal of pulling; and to simply throw money around wherever it’s needed, well, that would just mess EVERYTHING up.

Dandy; yes the USAF have lost at least 4 fighter AC this year.

*required

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement