<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: OMB Halts Reset Upgrades</title> <atom:link href="http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/07/09/abercrombie-hammers-omb-restrictions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/07/09/abercrombie-hammers-omb-restrictions/</link> <description>Online Defense and Acquisition Journal</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 06:21:51 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: tipover</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/07/09/abercrombie-hammers-omb-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-10454</link> <dc:creator>tipover</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:23:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7766#comment-10454</guid> <description>Dandy; yes the USAF have lost at least 4 fighter AC this year.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dandy; yes the USAF have lost at least 4 fighter AC this year.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DensityDuck</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/07/09/abercrombie-hammers-omb-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-10438</link> <dc:creator>DensityDuck</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 05:23:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7766#comment-10438</guid> <description>Rick:  No; it&#039;s that the Army has enough total dollars to do those things, but only some of those dollars are in the &quot;buy upgrades&quot; pile.  Other dollars are in the &quot;overseas ops&quot; pile.Now, it so happens that overseas ops doesn&#039;t need all of its pile.  You or I might say &quot;great, take the extra money and give it to the upgrades pile&quot;.  But money is allocated to piles based on a scientific process involving hands and butts and a good deal of pulling; and to simply throw money around wherever it&#039;s needed, well, that would just mess EVERYTHING up.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick:  No; it’s that the Army has enough total dollars to do those things, but only some of those dollars are in the “buy upgrades” pile.  Other dollars are in the “overseas ops” pile.</p><p>Now, it so happens that overseas ops doesn’t need all of its pile.  You or I might say “great, take the extra money and give it to the upgrades pile”.  But money is allocated to piles based on a scientific process involving hands and butts and a good deal of pulling; and to simply throw money around wherever it’s needed, well, that would just mess EVERYTHING up.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bambooviper</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/07/09/abercrombie-hammers-omb-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-10436</link> <dc:creator>Bambooviper</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 00:37:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7766#comment-10436</guid> <description>Rick --Could you tell me what Song Bird McCain and Wolf Killer Scoccer Mom Palin would have done to help this country. OK, Palin quit her job, I&#039;ll give you that one, what else, you seem to think you are well informed.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick –Could you tell me what Song Bird McCain and Wolf Killer Scoccer Mom Palin would have done to help this country. OK, Palin quit her job, I’ll give you that one, what else, you seem to think you are well informed.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rick</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/07/09/abercrombie-hammers-omb-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-10414</link> <dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 14:04:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7766#comment-10414</guid> <description>So let&#039;s see if I got this correct.1) The Army feels that it has enough money allocated to both:
a) Fight the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq (that&#039;s the &#039;overseas contingency&#039; fund).
b) Do the desired equipment upgrades.2) The Army WILL NOT use money from the war fund to upgrade equipment in case combat operations cost more than they currently project.3) Since the Army has enough money Abercrombie is going to take some of it away so they won&#039;t have enough.4) Since the Army has what they think is a good paln and this congressman wants to screw it up Obama is an anti-American child of Satan.Does that about cover it?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So let’s see if I got this correct.</p><p>1) The Army feels that it has enough money allocated to both:<br
/> a) Fight the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq (that’s the ‘overseas contingency’ fund).<br
/> b) Do the desired equipment upgrades.</p><p>2) The Army WILL NOT use money from the war fund to upgrade equipment in case combat operations cost more than they currently project.</p><p>3) Since the Army has enough money Abercrombie is going to take some of it away so they won’t have enough.</p><p>4) Since the Army has what they think is a good paln and this congressman wants to screw it up Obama is an anti-American child of Satan.</p><p>Does that about cover it?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mark S.</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/07/09/abercrombie-hammers-omb-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-10412</link> <dc:creator>Mark S.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 13:38:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7766#comment-10412</guid> <description>Hope and Change.Allah Akbar!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hope and Change.</p><p>Allah Akbar!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Daniel</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/07/09/abercrombie-hammers-omb-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-10400</link> <dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 01:36:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7766#comment-10400</guid> <description>i thought it was1) evil Zionist communist drug addict bankers2)skynet3)military industrial complex4) presidentskynet controls the PONTUS right?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i thought it was</p><p>1) evil Zionist communist drug addict bankers</p><p>2)skynet</p><p>3)military industrial complex</p><p>4) president</p><p>skynet controls the PONTUS right?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DensityDuck</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/07/09/abercrombie-hammers-omb-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-10398</link> <dc:creator>DensityDuck</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 01:24:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7766#comment-10398</guid> <description>Jason:  You forgot to blame--oh wait, you DID blame the International Zionist Conspiracy.  But you didn&#039;t blame Communist Agitators or Drug Criminals.  Troll better next time!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason:  You forgot to blame–oh wait, you DID blame the International Zionist Conspiracy.  But you didn’t blame Communist Agitators or Drug Criminals.  Troll better next time!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jason</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/07/09/abercrombie-hammers-omb-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-10392</link> <dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 22:37:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7766#comment-10392</guid> <description>The Military Industrial Complex is a well fed machine. I said it once and I will say it again, the power structure, 1 being highest:1) (International) Bankers (Wall Street)
2) Military Ind. Complex
3) PresidentObama, doesn&#039;t pull the Military strings, the bankers do.Conspiracy Theorist, I am not, but president&#039;s don&#039;t know shi* about how much funding to give the Military....</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Military Industrial Complex is a well fed machine. I said it once and I will say it again, the power structure, 1 being highest:</p><p>1) (International) Bankers (Wall Street)<br
/> 2) Military Ind. Complex<br
/> 3) President</p><p>Obama, doesn’t pull the Military strings, the bankers do.</p><p>Conspiracy Theorist, I am not, but president’s don’t know shi* about how much funding to give the Military.…</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jason</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/07/09/abercrombie-hammers-omb-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-10390</link> <dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 22:30:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7766#comment-10390</guid> <description>Dandy, thank you man. The USAF received 18+ Billion, from the Black Budget. Funds for the R&amp;D of the 2018 bomber, anyone!? Does anyone honestly believe the USAF and USN is struggling under Obama?! Jesus, it&#039;s not hard to believe, just research. The DoD will receive 767+ Billion this upcoming year, and it does NOT include the Black Budget!So, in a since, their is over 850+ Billion for ONE year! Mind you folks, we are in a DEEP FREAKING RECESSION! We should be happy we receive an 70+ billion in &quot;overall&quot; budget, Base, Supplemental, Black, .ect....Flame me if you want, I couldn&#039;t care less, but that is the truth.Numbers don&#039;t lie, people do.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dandy, thank you man. The USAF received 18+ Billion, from the Black Budget. Funds for the R&amp;D of the 2018 bomber, anyone!? Does anyone honestly believe the USAF and USN is struggling under Obama?! Jesus, it’s not hard to believe, just research. The DoD will receive 767+ Billion this upcoming year, and it does NOT include the Black Budget!</p><p> So, in a since, their is over 850+ Billion for ONE year! Mind you folks, we are in a DEEP FREAKING RECESSION! We should be happy we receive an 70+ billion in “overall” budget, Base, Supplemental, Black, .ect.…</p><p>Flame me if you want, I couldn’t care less, but that is the truth.</p><p>Numbers don’t lie, people do.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dandy</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/07/09/abercrombie-hammers-omb-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-10388</link> <dc:creator>Dandy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:31:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7766#comment-10388</guid> <description>But then Obama funded four additional F-22s with supplemental contingency funds. This was once justified as replacing lost equipment, but were four USAF jet fighters lost this past year?But I agree, the Pentagon has been covertly expanding their budgets even more by using war funds for normal ops.BTW, for those he don&#039;t read much, Obama is spending more on the military that Bush had planned. The nation is going bankrupt but the Feds boost all spending and give everyone more pay raises. Hopefully, we will get a conservative president who will slash all spending and federal pay, and withdraw from these colonial wars.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But then Obama funded four additional F-22s with supplemental contingency funds. This was once justified as replacing lost equipment, but were four USAF jet fighters lost this past year?</p><p>But I agree, the Pentagon has been covertly expanding their budgets even more by using war funds for normal ops.</p><p>BTW, for those he don’t read much, Obama is spending more on the military that Bush had planned. The nation is going bankrupt but the Feds boost all spending and give everyone more pay raises. Hopefully, we will get a conservative president who will slash all spending and federal pay, and withdraw from these colonial wars.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DC2 Jennings</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/07/09/abercrombie-hammers-omb-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-10360</link> <dc:creator>DC2 Jennings</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:11:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7766#comment-10360</guid> <description>I think DD is correct.  Can&#039;t move money from one &quot;bucket&quot; to another &quot;bucket&quot;.  Either way it looks like government is working the way it is supposed to.  Congress is questioning actions made by the Executvie Branch.  If anything needs to be fixed or adjusted it should get fixed.DC2</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think DD is correct.  Can’t move money from one “bucket” to another “bucket”.  Either way it looks like government is working the way it is supposed to.  Congress is questioning actions made by the Executvie Branch.  If anything needs to be fixed or adjusted it should get fixed.</p><p>DC2</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: dave</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/07/09/abercrombie-hammers-omb-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-10357</link> <dc:creator>dave</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:16:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7766#comment-10357</guid> <description>Ah, more of Obama&#039;s behind-the-scenes gutting of defense. Obama is a clever guy - evil, vile, and loathsome - but clever.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, more of Obama’s behind-the-scenes gutting of defense. Obama is a clever guy — evil, vile, and loathsome — but clever.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PropWash</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/07/09/abercrombie-hammers-omb-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-10349</link> <dc:creator>PropWash</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:54:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7766#comment-10349</guid> <description>Previous overseas contingency operations (OCO) supplemental funding rules allowed a certain amount of &quot;reset&quot; to include equipment upgrades, but the FY10 OCO rules became more restrictive to ensure war supplemental funds focused primarily on current ops, not enduring capabilities.  Any procurements with OCO funds must be delivered in the year of execution.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Previous overseas contingency operations (OCO) supplemental funding rules allowed a certain amount of “reset” to include equipment upgrades, but the FY10 OCO rules became more restrictive to ensure war supplemental funds focused primarily on current ops, not enduring capabilities.  Any procurements with OCO funds must be delivered in the year of execution.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DensityDuck</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/07/09/abercrombie-hammers-omb-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-10345</link> <dc:creator>DensityDuck</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:50:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7766#comment-10345</guid> <description>Yes, that&#039;s more clear now.  So the OMB won&#039;t let the Army take money from the &quot;operations&quot; pot and dump it into the &quot;upgrades&quot; pot?  Well, that&#039;s just business as usual, isn&#039;t it?  I mean, not that it&#039;s SMART, but it&#039;s standard budget practice...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that’s more clear now.  So the OMB won’t let the Army take money from the “operations” pot and dump it into the “upgrades” pot?  Well, that’s just business as usual, isn’t it?  I mean, not that it’s SMART, but it’s standard budget practice…</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Papa Ray</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/07/09/abercrombie-hammers-omb-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-10343</link> <dc:creator>Papa Ray</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:24:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7766#comment-10343</guid> <description>It might help some if you would give the full name and function of OMB.Papa Ray</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might help some if you would give the full name and function of OMB.</p><p>Papa Ray</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gray Eagle</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/07/09/abercrombie-hammers-omb-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-10336</link> <dc:creator>Gray Eagle</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:00:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7766#comment-10336</guid> <description>Shades of the OMB/McNamara FY &#039;67 fiasco.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shades of the OMB/McNamara FY ’67 fiasco.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dow</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/07/09/abercrombie-hammers-omb-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-10335</link> <dc:creator>Dow</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:53:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7766#comment-10335</guid> <description>Nothing to be confused about. Barry Obama is gutting the
military.  Hello Carter hollow force.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing to be confused about. Barry Obama is gutting the<br
/> military.  Hello Carter hollow force.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Colin Clark</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/07/09/abercrombie-hammers-omb-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-10333</link> <dc:creator>Colin Clark</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:51:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7766#comment-10333</guid> <description>Alex, DD,I rewrote some of it to clarify. Hope this helps!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex, DD,</p><p>I rewrote some of it to clarify. Hope this helps!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alex</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/07/09/abercrombie-hammers-omb-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-10321</link> <dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:35:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7766#comment-10321</guid> <description>I&#039;m confused too, thoughts in this post aren&#039;t too clear to me.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m confused too, thoughts in this post aren’t too clear to me.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DensityDuck</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/07/09/abercrombie-hammers-omb-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-10318</link> <dc:creator>DensityDuck</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:18:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7766#comment-10318</guid> <description>I&#039;m a bit confused by this post.  It seems as though Chiarelli is saying that the Army&#039;s budget is big enough, when taken as a whole, to do all the upgrades that it wants.  However, the OMB has declared that it can only spend a certain amount on upgrades, and that&#039;s NOT enough to do all of them; whereas other parts have wasted space.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m a bit confused by this post.  It seems as though Chiarelli is saying that the Army’s budget is big enough, when taken as a whole, to do all the upgrades that it wants.  However, the OMB has declared that it can only spend a certain amount on upgrades, and that’s NOT enough to do all of them; whereas other parts have wasted space.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 12/39 queries in 0.023 seconds using apc

Served from: cloud-milcom-web1.hspheredns.com @ 2010-03-17 07:04:36 -->