<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Army ‘Struggling’ for Flexible Forces</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/07/10/army-struggling-for-flexible-forces/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/07/10/army-struggling-for-flexible-forces/</link>
	<description>Online Defense and Acquisition Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:20:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nick newton</title>
		<link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/07/10/army-struggling-for-flexible-forces/comment-page-1/#comment-11475</link>
		<dc:creator>nick newton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 01:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7803#comment-11475</guid>
		<description>people want of a challanging B.C.T just look at how the marine corp is meeting its standers over the army</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>people want of a challanging B.C.T just look at how the marine corp is meeting its standers over the army</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick newton</title>
		<link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/07/10/army-struggling-for-flexible-forces/comment-page-1/#comment-11474</link>
		<dc:creator>nick newton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 01:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7803#comment-11474</guid>
		<description>The navy and marine corp should part its ways with the ground combat systems and small arms and the navy and marine corp should come up with better systems and the army would save more money for f.c.s nothing like tanks or anything like that it would dumb if they did that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The navy and marine corp should part its ways with the ground combat systems and small arms and the navy and marine corp should come up with better systems and the army would save more money for f.c.s nothing like tanks or anything like that it would dumb if they did that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick newton</title>
		<link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/07/10/army-struggling-for-flexible-forces/comment-page-1/#comment-11472</link>
		<dc:creator>nick newton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 01:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7803#comment-11472</guid>
		<description>we need a new B.C.T that is harder than what we have now. like a 17 week training program that is harder than the marine corp boot camp we have now. Which means  we should change are way to get into the army with 50% high school diplomas and 50% G.E.Ds.we also should make the u.s marine corp even stonger and the  u.s navy, u.s air fore,u.s.c.g.So what i mean is that u.s marine corp boot camp needs to be 23 weeks long and u.s navy&#039;s should also be 17 weeks long and the same with air fore and u.s.c.g.Some you of might not think this would work but it can.but the marine corp and navy change its standers to get in in with 15% more G.E.Ds than high school dipolmas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we need a new B.C.T that is harder than what we have now. like a 17 week training program that is harder than the marine corp boot camp we have now. Which means  we should change are way to get into the army with 50% high school diplomas and 50% G.E.Ds.we also should make the u.s marine corp even stonger and the  u.s navy, u.s air fore,u.s.c.g.So what i mean is that u.s marine corp boot camp needs to be 23 weeks long and u.s navy’s should also be 17 weeks long and the same with air fore and u.s.c.g.Some you of might not think this would work but it can.but the marine corp and navy change its standers to get in in with 15% more G.E.Ds than high school dipolmas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephen russell</title>
		<link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/07/10/army-struggling-for-flexible-forces/comment-page-1/#comment-10478</link>
		<dc:creator>stephen russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 01:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7803#comment-10478</guid>
		<description>CUT Army DC bureaucracy alone &amp; expand forces.
Re estd the RDF of the 80s anew.
Fwd base forces.
Merge units &amp; forces
Revive the AirCav?
Revive Armored Cav?
Use new weapons &amp; tactics.
Think Lean, Fast &amp; Smart.
Use more UAVs &amp; RPVs.

Think Paratroops BUT more Guns for defense &amp; offense but Mobile as Paratroops.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CUT Army DC bureaucracy alone &amp; expand forces.<br />
Re estd the RDF of the 80s anew.<br />
Fwd base forces.<br />
Merge units &amp; forces<br />
Revive the AirCav?<br />
Revive Armored Cav?<br />
Use new weapons &amp; tactics.<br />
Think Lean, Fast &amp; Smart.<br />
Use more UAVs &amp; RPVs.</p>
<p>Think Paratroops BUT more Guns for defense &amp; offense but Mobile as Paratroops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chief Houston</title>
		<link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/07/10/army-struggling-for-flexible-forces/comment-page-1/#comment-10455</link>
		<dc:creator>Chief Houston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7803#comment-10455</guid>
		<description>CVN,

Maybe you need to grow up someday! The only thing that is constant is constant change! Static mentality in situational leadership is a liability!

Anybody that thinks that our services cannot project power is mistaken. Maybe you are the 
Markist!

Speed and effectiveness are needed across the spectrum of our armed services. How that is portrayed in the organizational structures should be as fluid as the body&#039;s biological defense systems with stand by stem cells ready to convert on an as needed basis.

Quality in is quality out. We must look at the leadership of our services and their ability to adapt in a timely manner. If you cannot stand a rapid change muster than we have a problem, that must be addressed immediately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CVN,</p>
<p>Maybe you need to grow up someday! The only thing that is constant is constant change! Static mentality in situational leadership is a liability!</p>
<p>Anybody that thinks that our services cannot project power is mistaken. Maybe you are the<br />
Markist!</p>
<p>Speed and effectiveness are needed across the spectrum of our armed services. How that is portrayed in the organizational structures should be as fluid as the body’s biological defense systems with stand by stem cells ready to convert on an as needed basis.</p>
<p>Quality in is quality out. We must look at the leadership of our services and their ability to adapt in a timely manner. If you cannot stand a rapid change muster than we have a problem, that must be addressed immediately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rabbit</title>
		<link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/07/10/army-struggling-for-flexible-forces/comment-page-1/#comment-10411</link>
		<dc:creator>Rabbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 12:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7803#comment-10411</guid>
		<description>Were #5!
Were #5!
Were #5!
Were #5!
That chant should not be hard to get used to at all.
If the US were number 5 in so many things that would be a vast improvement.
If you do not see the connection between the chant and being an Army of One then perhaps I am in need of some vast improvement.
5 plus 1 equals 6 and that is the key to a not so secret secret.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Were #5!<br />
Were #5!<br />
Were #5!<br />
Were #5!<br />
That chant should not be hard to get used to at all.<br />
If the US were number 5 in so many things that would be a vast improvement.<br />
If you do not see the connection between the chant and being an Army of One then perhaps I am in need of some vast improvement.<br />
5 plus 1 equals 6 and that is the key to a not so secret secret.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cvn</title>
		<link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/07/10/army-struggling-for-flexible-forces/comment-page-1/#comment-10394</link>
		<dc:creator>cvn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 23:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7803#comment-10394</guid>
		<description>obama is probably looking for a constabulary force designed to put down protests like his marxist buddies in Iran and Venezuela.

No power projection needed or wanted....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>obama is probably looking for a constabulary force designed to put down protests like his marxist buddies in Iran and Venezuela.</p>
<p>No power projection needed or wanted.…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
