Comments on: Army Tries Doctrine Wikis http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/07/16/army-tries-doctrine-wikis/ Online Defense and Acquisition Journal Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:01:54 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Cal Cousineau http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/07/16/army-tries-doctrine-wikis/comment-page-1/#comment-12955 Cal Cousineau Thu, 20 Aug 2009 21:39:23 +0000 http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7998#comment-12955 that is seriously interesting. that is seriously interesting.

]]> By: Threadtheneedle http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/07/16/army-tries-doctrine-wikis/comment-page-1/#comment-10897 Threadtheneedle Sun, 19 Jul 2009 00:21:04 +0000 http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7998#comment-10897 Who in the military is really serious about defending and protecting the US Constitution anyway? Maj. Cook says that he is. Yet driving 66 MPH in a 65 zone is breaking the US constitution. Hell if our military members can not even do something simple like obey the speed limit how can we expect them to do the right thing when it comes to something difficult? Other people say dat they fight to protect their buddies. Wow that is real cute. We have a nuclear armed Hells Angles club with club houses and golf courses all over the country. 99% of the military say they have to follow the orders of those above them unless it is obviously a war crime yet they depend on those above them to define what "obvious" is despite the fact that the Nuremburg War Crime Trials determined otherwise. If we have people in the military that can not protect the Constitution under the most simple of conditions how can we rely on them to protect the Constitution under difficult conditions? The obvious answer is that we can't. Not that the Constitution is the highest good in any case. It is up to disloyal citizens to balance the scales of justice. How? How? How?? Think? Disloyal citizens disperse!! Who in the military is really serious about defending and protecting the US Constitution anyway? Maj. Cook says that he is. Yet driving 66 MPH in a 65 zone is breaking the US constitution. Hell if our military members can not even do something simple like obey the speed limit how can we expect them to do the right thing when it comes to something difficult?
Other people say dat they fight to protect their buddies. Wow that is real cute. We have a nuclear armed Hells Angles club with club houses and golf courses all over the country.
99% of the military say they have to follow the orders of those above them unless it is obviously a war crime yet they depend on those above them to define what “obvious” is despite the fact that the Nuremburg War Crime Trials determined otherwise.
If we have people in the military that can not protect the Constitution under the most simple of conditions how can we rely on them to protect the Constitution under difficult conditions? The obvious answer is that we can’t. Not that the Constitution is the highest good in any case.
It is up to disloyal citizens to balance the scales of justice.
How? How? How??
Think?
Disloyal citizens disperse!!

]]> By: Daniel Russ http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/07/16/army-tries-doctrine-wikis/comment-page-1/#comment-10755 Daniel Russ Fri, 17 Jul 2009 00:51:23 +0000 http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=7998#comment-10755 If the Army wants to be relevant to young people they are recruiting, it helps to jump into new forms of digital media where young people "congregate". Zero to 5000 users in a week and a half is not bad. Daniel Russ Civilianmilitaryintelligencegroup.com If the Army wants to be relevant to young people they are recruiting, it helps to jump into new forms of digital media where young people “congregate”. Zero to 5000 users in a week and a half is not bad.

Daniel Russ
Civilianmilitaryintelligencegroup.com

]]>