NG Offers Small, Light UGV

NG Offers Small, Light UGV

Northrop Grumman has unveiled a new unmanned ground vehicle, EyeDrive, that poses a direct threat to iRobot’s SUGV and is being pitched to the Army as a successor or replacement for SUGV for the FCS folo-on program.

The new vehicle was spawned in Israel and, according to at least one source, is already in use by some U.S. special operations troops. A video supplied by the company makes clear NG is pitching the product to the special ops community for hostage rescue. It includes pictures of hostages and bad guys in cells. (If I can shrink the video I hope to post it soon.)

Several capabilities make the EyeDrive a very interesting competitor. It is able to make small hops over obstacles, an ability that is depicted in the video. Also, the Israelis are reportedly trying to build armed versions of the EyeDrive. The video shows it dropping what could be a grenade or small bomb or an independent video camera as it moves along.


The biggest market for this is clearly the Army and Marines. I saw EyeDrive do its stuff at the AUVSI conference here. The machine is much smaller and lighter than iRobot’s SUGV and appears to offer sharper video with better coverage area. It appears to be too small to offer the kind of arm attachment that SUGV can be deployed with, but EyeDrive has a built in camera that can be tilted up to look for bombs on the undersides of vehicles or to look for booby-traps in houses.

Northrop obtained the license for EyeDrive from Israel’s ODF Optronics, a company known for making small batches of highly capable equipment for Israel’s special operations troops.

Share |

Join the Conversation

I heard the Israelis use these things to explore tunnels under the Egypt Gaza border.

Isnt this about the size of the Dragon Runner except with tracks? Why are we not fostering the second gen of Dragon Runner already?

No offense to the Israelis, but we have plenty of capability here, it’s just that the DOD has been lax with putting out formal program requirements for UGV’s.

It’s as if with the demise of FCS, no one seems to be stepping up to the plate saying enough with the MULE which seems to be going nowhere after so many years. Let’s get on with building this stuff and putting it in the hands of our troops!

One general did mention something similar to what I’m saying at the AUVSI conference, but where is the Dept. of Army or the Pentagon backing him up with MONEY AND a formal RFP??

*required

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement