<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: NG Offers Small, Light UGV</title> <atom:link href="http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/08/13/ng-offers-small-light-ugv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/08/13/ng-offers-small-light-ugv/</link> <description>Online Defense and Acquisition Journal</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:37:03 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: atacms</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/08/13/ng-offers-small-light-ugv/#comment-12464</link> <dc:creator>atacms</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:08:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=8795#comment-12464</guid> <description>Isnt this about the size of the Dragon Runner except with tracks? Why are we not fostering the second gen of Dragon Runner already?No offense to the Israelis, but we have plenty of capability here, it&#039;s just that the DOD has been lax with putting out formal program requirements for UGV&#039;s.It&#039;s as if with the demise of FCS, no one seems to be stepping up to the plate saying enough with the MULE which seems to be going nowhere after so many years. Let&#039;s get on with building this stuff and putting it in the hands of our troops!One general did mention something similar to what I&#039;m saying at the AUVSI conference, but where is the Dept. of Army or the Pentagon backing him up with MONEY AND a formal RFP??</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isnt this about the size of the Dragon Runner except with tracks? Why are we not fostering the second gen of Dragon Runner already?</p><p>No offense to the Israelis, but we have plenty of capability here, it’s just that the DOD has been lax with putting out formal program requirements for UGV’s.</p><p>It’s as if with the demise of FCS, no one seems to be stepping up to the plate saying enough with the MULE which seems to be going nowhere after so many years. Let’s get on with building this stuff and putting it in the hands of our troops!</p><p>One general did mention something similar to what I’m saying at the AUVSI conference, but where is the Dept. of Army or the Pentagon backing him up with MONEY AND a formal RFP??</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Drake1</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/08/13/ng-offers-small-light-ugv/#comment-12458</link> <dc:creator>Drake1</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 18:25:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=8795#comment-12458</guid> <description>I heard the Israelis use these things to explore tunnels under the Egypt Gaza border.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard the Israelis use these things to explore tunnels under the Egypt Gaza border.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.004 seconds using apc
Object Caching 618/619 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.dodbuzz.com

Served from: dodbuzz.com @ 2012-02-09 06:53:11 -->
