The Battle of Kandahar

The Battle of Kandahar

A wave of insurgent attacks have hit Afghanistan’s capital, Kabul, in recent days as the country’s presidential elections draw near. The spectacular attacks may distract from a greater danger down south, according to a number of Afghanistan watchers, who warn of the possibility of a Taliban takeover of Kandahar city. The former Taliban stronghold has emerged as the key piece of terrain in the current phase of the Afghan war.

Occasional adviser to the U.S. command in Afghanistan, Andrew Exum, a fellow at the Center for a New American Security, recently warned that the fall of Kandahar would not come in the Tet offensive version, that is, not with Taliban flying columns loaded in Toyota pickups. Instead, the fear is of a creeping takeover of the city by insurgents operating in the shadows, assassinating or intimidating the police, judges and local leaders. Counterinsurgency adviser David Kilcullen, speaking at USIP last week, said clandestine Taliban cells in Kandahar are waging a “silent war of terror.”

In a report issued last December, the Senlis Council, a Brussels based research organization, warned of an insurgent noose tightening around Kabul, and that there was a risk of the city being overrun by the Taliban. The report was largely dismissed as being a tad hyperbolic. The sizeable ISAF presence in Kabul would preclude any direct Taliban attack on the capital, although clearly suicide and car bombings and mortar and rocket attacks are a persistent threat.


Where the insurgent noose is really tightening is around Kandahar. Already there are well established Taliban enclaves in the Pashtun city. A number of the districts surrounding Kandahar are under serious stress. Kandahar holds important significance for the Taliban and if insurgents were to gain a foothold, even to the point where it became a debate as to who actually controlled the city, it would be a staggering defeat for the U.S. led coalition.

The Council on Foreign Relation’s Stephen Biddle, for one, believes the current disposition of U.S. forces should be changed. Troops currently operating in the northeast, in the mountainous areas along the order with Pakistan, should be shifted down south to the Kandahar area.

Some experts have hinted, without coming right out and saying so, that the ongoing offensive in Helmand has been a poor use of the Marine Expeditionary Brigade; that the Marines would have been more effectively employed in and around Kandahar. The Helmand offensive was planned in advance long before the new Afghan commander, Gen. Stanley McChrystal, took over. It will be interesting to see if there is a reallocation of forces in coming months.

Kandahar is now the priority for new Afghan Army units and resources, according to officials. The Army’s 5th Stryker brigade is also now operating in the area and should bolster security around the city.

Join the Conversation

With this report I’m guessing the rumors of Generals wanting even more troops could be indeed true. And hopefully Obama will do as he said, “Listen to his Generals”.

The problem is that we need sufficient troops to secure Kandahar, root out the Taliban in Helmand, and keep the pressure on the warlords and Taliban in the east.

This is simply 8 years of Bush’s neglect and focus on Iraq coming home to roost; McChrystal needs to tell Obama and Gates the truth on how many more troops are needed before we bleed the military dry as Bush did in Iraq

Having just read an article bemoaning the return General Dostum to Afganistan, and how he may have “violated” the “human rights” of possibly 2,000 Taleban, the more he is endeared to me !

Perhaps this is the man that can help us save Kandehar, as well as the rest of this miscreant land. Let’s employ him immediatly!

Dispense with all the squishy European second guessing and let’s win this war, and get it done.

Then move back into Pakistan, the roach infested nest of Wahabist Islam, and settle a few scores there, as well.

BTW, I’ve voften wondered why my former employer, VOA (Voice of America) doesn’t seem to wish to engage militant Islam in a simple wrestling match of ideas. Do Islamists not love their mothers, their sisters, their wives, their daughters? It would appear that they hold them in such low regard that they are willing to render them to the tender mercies of the brain dead Taleban, who throw acid in their faces if they dare wear lipstick ! This calls into question not only the mentality, but the manhood of all Afghan men. Do they not wish to protect their women from the Taliban?
Why is this not being questioned daily on the airwaves of Afghanistan? ??? Do theyhave no code of chivalry, other than their demented “honor killings”? More to come

Only in Islam do we find a “culture” in which men so demean an degrade women that if a dsaughter or sister is raped, she is killed by her male relatives. How perverse is thuis? Yet it is widespread. There needs to be at thurough re-examination of the tenats of Islam throughout the Islamic world.
It is a religion thet preaches hatred of the “infidel” while it uses the infidel menu of goodies, such as cell phones, televisions, cars, car bombs, computers, even toilet paper. All these are “forbidden” inventions, none invented by jealous muslims.
Islam detests the west because it knows it is inferior to the west, and inferior to Christianity. Since they cant challenge us on an intellectual plane, they decide to murder us.

Let’s examine, for example, the construct that gives 72 dark haired virgins to each suicide bomber. Really?

Well, what if you wanted a few blonds nad redheads? And why only 72? After all, this is eternity ! I could go through 72 virgins in 72 hours. Then what? Whose paradise is this? Do you recycle these poor virgins? Or are they raped by the next bomber who kills a bussload of Israelies. Do they get vacations? Health care?
Something tells me there’s something a bit strange about “Islam”, but we’re not allowed to dicuss it because it’s politically incorrect.
Get a grip, folks. This isn’t a religion, it’s a cult of evil. The rantings and ravings of a bedouin pedophile.

He better listen, we need to get Afghanistan under control or we will loose control of Iraq. May not make sense to you, but if the terrorists see we are losing in afghanistan they might just open the iraqi front right back open again.

Andrew…Afghanistan is the “wrong war”.

The “mission” in Afghanistan was to destroy an Al Queda safe haven not to replace the Taliban with a democracy or to crush the Taliban.

The amount of additional troops obama wants to inject will do little but increase the US death toll and his powerbase of liberal anti-war refugees from the 68–72 timeframe won’t abide by the type of commitment and expenditures of men and money (it will come from their part of the payoff) it will take to make a dent in the Afghanistan problem. obama’s powerbase doesn’t want to share our tax dollars with the military in any way and he can’t afford to alienate them by giving “the generals” what they want. Afghanistan and obama have cluster f*** written all over it.

The Wars have been won. If not for the political gain of people like Obama, Pelosi, Martha and the other Demorats — our sons and daughters would have been out of both countries a long time ago. Get rid of them and we’ll be out of both countries and onto Iran (next)… As mentioned in another blurb — let the Generals fight the War. They know best because at least they are our fighting men and women. Most politicians were never in the Military although they state they are experts within that field.

Joe Hammer…I’m not shooting a round across your bow but I must ask, have you been to Afghanistan recently? This is my 2nd tour in 4 years and 4 combat tours since 2002. This battle in Afghan was NEVER won. We were very close but then had the rug pulled out from under us due to Iraq ambitions.

I am of the opinion that strategic air power must be used to the maximum in Afghanistan.
An announcement could be made in advance about the area to be bombed in order to prevent civilian casualties. The area,or areas would then be denied to the insurgents, and more ground troops would not be needed. Air power is awesome, and must not be restricted. Please tell me if I am wrong.

As we all know afgan has been at war for centuries with other countries.We might win if we look the other way and start using cluster bombs were its neede to save more of our lives.Brittian for example lost more troops in July alone then the whole year pols are going open as eyes from citizens all over!!

Not many want to say it, but I believe we are in a war of civilizations, religion etc. Not all moslems are crazy wahhabi’s, but to some this is very true. The Crusades in 1100, now we have the same here, moslems trying to expand thier religious views, laws, by ANY means neccessary. Kick them back across the PAK border, then bomb them to dust. The problem IS P-stan. its where they live, operate with impunity. hell with that, take the fight to where they are.

Rodney Bryant is right. This should have been farther along than we are now. Iraq was not a threat, Saddam was boxed in. iraq sucked the resources we coulda used where the 9/11 attacks were directed. Godspeed Mr Bryant, good luck.

*required

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement