Manual Preps Army For Afghanistan

Manual Preps Army For Afghanistan

American troops in Afghanistan face a very different enemy than the one they encountered in Iraq. The single biggest difference: insurgents in Afghanistan will stand and fight. The Taliban and other insurgent groups display good small unit tactics, with sophisticated synchronization of direct and indirect fire and fire and maneuver, all hallmarks of a seasoned and well trained enemy, says Col. Robert Forrester, director of the Center for Army Lessons Learned (CALL).

“We’ve got to remember that this enemy is experienced,” Forrester said, “this is a warrior culture.” The U.S. military has been fighting for going on eight years and considers itself combat seasoned. Some fighters in Afghanistan, certainly tribal elders, have been battling a range of enemies, from a global superpower to rival militias, nonstop for nearly thirty years. “They are very resourceful, they are very adaptive they are willing to stand toe-to-toe with you and fight it out at the small unit, light infantry level,” Forrester said.

Forrester discussed with reporters on a conference call yesterday a new manual just released by CALL, 09–37, Small Unit Operations in Afghanistan, that compiles specific observations and lessons learned at small unit — that is platoon and company — level.

The manual has been tailored to prepare soldiers for the unique battlefield conditions encountered in Afghanistan, including: intermittent radio and satellite communications that can be hindered by high mountains; physical fitness as a major priority and how to prepare soldiers for operating at high altitudes; ensuring that every soldier is able to operate every weapon in the unit; how to call for close air support and fire support; medical training; patrolling and fortifying patrol bases. The manual goes into considerable detail on establishing security for remote combat outposts, in light of lessons learned from the bloody insurgent attack on a U.S. outpost in Wanat last year.

Afghanistan is extremely decentralized, hence so is the enemy, so U.S. troops can expect to encounter different styles of fighting depending on the area where they operate and the specific tribe or insurgent group they’re fighting.

The Army is struggling to counter insurgent IED attacks, the single biggest killer of U.S. troops in Afghanistan. Forward deployed evaluation teams there immediately feed any new enemy tactics encountered back to the service’s combat training centers in the U.S.

Afghanistan’s rural and mountainous terrain drives insurgents IED tactics. They take advantage of natural defiles, how the roads are built with large drainage ditches on each side and thousands of culverts, “which are ready made IED emplacing areas,” Forrester said. As for triggering, Afghan insurgents use much more command wire detonation versus wireless signal triggering, which was common in Iraq.

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Join the Conversation

That’s really good that they are prepping for that. I was waiting for that! Go ARMY, im going soon!!

Oh no, here comes the cynic in me again! Darn, this SWA adventure is turning me into a curmugeon.
Sounds like Col Forrester is doing an advertisement for his newest phamphlet. Actually, if the Afghan Taliban will stand and fight — this is great news! That plays to our strengths in fire support, manuever, etc. If they will just stand there and take it we can use artillery, helicopters, etc to nail them.
The worst news we could get would be if he was to say that the Taliban was gonna adopt classic insurgent tactics of ambush and fade away.
Still, our best efforts are to go after the experts who build the detonators for the IEDs. Those people are few, highly trained, and hard to replace.

The enemy is different because they live their whole life in fighting. I’d say if this is a so called war against the terrorists who killed more 4000 innocent americans in 9/11, we should not give any limits or restrictions to it. How else can we win this?

The reasons for the limits and restrictions is to give the enemy less propaganda to use against us to reduce local, home side, and international support for the cause as well as for recruiting more terrorists to fight against us.

It wouldn’t bode well for our forces if we just ran through the Middle East shooting anyone that has brown skin, doesn’t speak English, and wears a cloth wrapped around their head. That’d just increase how many enemies we have to fight tenfold… because then it wouldn’t be just terrorists we’re fighting, but innocent people simply defending themselves. That’s how the terrorists recruit: they paint us to be a threat to even the innocent people who meant us no harm in the first place. And when we have cases of servicemen stealing from the locals, raping their women, or executing innocent people for no reason, it makes it that much easier for them to get new recruits.

I think, they will stand and fight because they (Taliban,Al-quida and its allies) dont have any place to go.

One best way to fight these terrorist is produce good Afghan troops that wil be allied and honest to us. The afghan knows their borders, the Taliban, the Al-quida and its allies than us.

*required

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement