Troubled STSS Readies for Launch

Troubled STSS Readies for Launch

5. 4. 3. 2. 1. Northrop Grumman employees will be holding their breath around Sept. 15 when the enormous billows of flame and smoke begin to spew forth from a rocket lifting a new generation of space sensors into orbit.

That launch will carry two demonstration satellites of a $1.4 billion program known as the Space Tracking and Surveillance System. Northrop Grumman employees will be holding their breath because STSS may mean billions in new business if the satellites perform as planned. And there is always the possibility of a launch failure. Given how long the program has been in gestation — more than a decade, after having been canceled once before — there is almost no hope of building more STSS birds. A new program would have to be started and this is a difficult time to get any new program approved by the Pentagon.

STSS will provide capabilities the US does not have now. The two satellites will be able, from their low earth orbit, to give missileers a “stereo” view of a cold missile flying through space. That means the US could shoot one missile at the incoming threat, see if it hits and then ready another strike with much higher confidence than is currently possible, said Larry Dodgen, sector VP for Northrop’s information systems. That ability to track a “cold” missile in space also gives US forces much greater confidence they can take out a missile that is maneuvering since the threat is being tracked through space in close to real time.

Today, US forces rely on the DSP satellites to spot a missile launch and then the threat is tracked by ground or ship-based radar. STSS will, if it all works, allow the US to use far fewer ground stations. Northrop sent me a backgrounder saying that STSS would provide tracking capability equivalent to about “50 TPY?2 radars or approximately 20 sea?based X?Band radars.”

STSS could also provide crucial help to one of the country’s most pressing military issues — improving our knowledge of what is in space and where it is at any given time. Dodgen said STSS could help improve the data in the so-called space catalog that is compiled by NASA and the Air Force. However, that will come after the satellites go through their rigorous on-orbit checkout and they prove themselves able to carry out their primary missions of tracking launched missile.

A classified STSS payload launched in May could also provide some new capabilities but I know next to nothing about it.

The entire program was publicly criticized for lousy quality control by no less a figure than Lt. Gen Patrick O’Reilly, director of the Missile Defense Agency. Testifying before the House Armed Services Committee, O’Reilly said May 21 more than half of his agency’s $152 million budget overrun in 2008 was due to STSS. Fred Ricker, the former STSS program manager who is now Northrop’s VP for military space systems, told me that they had had problems with a “box” supplied by a subcontractor, among several technical issues they faced.

Because the subcontractor no longer did any military business, Northrop had to open up the box and reverse engineer it to figure out what was causing the problem and then fixed it. That sort of work eats up tremendous numbers of very expensive man hours. But that is all behind them now and he said he would tell Gen. O’Reilly that those problems are fixed.

The Delta 2 launch in mid-September will be just the beginning of the process of proving that all is now well with STSS.

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Join the Conversation

September 15th: “The STSS satellite, built by Northrop Grumman Space Technology, exploded shortly after reaching orbit today, sources in the DoD tell Space News. Reports that its first picture was a small humanoid figure pointing a rocket launcher and making an obscene gesture are ‘unconfirmed’, according to the source.”

I was a subcontractor to Northrop/Grumman 10 years ago and they were going through alot of hard times. I hope they have overcome their problems and get this bird up and running.

“It takes a constellation.…” “Stereo” implies at least two birds with differing views, which makes this launch the true test of the stereo capability. Whereas the May launch is likely confirming basic systems, commanding and sensor operation as I type. Depending on coverage and accuracy requirements, the number of birds required to complete the LEO constellation for high confidence tracking and targeting could exceed 18, plus ready-to-launch spares. Best of luck NGST, this could be a real breadwinner in the long run.

Orbit info from: http://​www​.as​.northropgrumman​.com/​p​r​o​d​u​c​t​s​/​s​t​s​s​/​a​s​s​e​t​s​/​S​T​S​S​_​F​a​c​t​_​S​h​e​e​t​_​J​a​n​0​3​.​pdf

DensityDuck,

How dare you mention Space News in this space! I am shocked. You know we’d have it first!! BTW, how did you know about the humanoid.…

Have it flown and attach a rocket booster on the sides that can be controlled on earth in respect to its mobility, so it can be used over and over again. And make 1000 of this. We’ll never know when rougue nations (Iran, N. Korea, Russia, China, Cuba, and other rougue nations) will fire their missiles until they do. With this we will surelly know when and where they will be flown.

Colin: I’m sure that DODBuzz would obey the terms of BLUE BOOK classification for this sort of information!

If every thing is redy why not try it, As every day we see healhcare cartel is draining the surface minded people like myself​.My Question is why do we need to be healty? to be occupied by ennemies of united state ofAmerica. Think about it for a second!Why do we need to fight for budget when is not our country any more and…

thats nuts… but will be excellent for the united states. Thank GOD. i love my Country. yay!

but i really wonder when we will be able to commercially go to the moon, ya know? i know we can now, but i want an article on that or something. AHH im just waiting to sign up and go to iraq

The anticipated capability to replace 20 sea based X-band radar arrays is quite significant if that in fact is the case. However, you would not want to give up the counter strike launch capability of the sea based platform.

*required

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement