Another Protest, Stop-Work: FMTV

Another Protest, Stop-Work: FMTV

The latest contract award for FMTV — worth roughly $2 billion — was declared a stunning upset when it was awarded and it looks as if BAE Systems and Navistar, the stunned ones, weren’t willing to accept the results. Once the protest was filed Oshkosh received a stop-work order from the Army. The good news here is that Oshkosh won’t actually start production until the middle of next year and won’t go to full production until 2011. So the chances of production being harmed are moderately low.

BAE announced this morning that “the Army did not properly evaluate the proposals, consistent with the Government’s stated requirements, and the Army failed accurately to assess the various risks associated with the different proposals.” Perhaps the best news coming out of this protest is that the company’s designated spokesman on the issue, Linda Hudson, president of land and armaments, said the company “did not take lightly” the decision to protest the award to Oshkosh.

“The Army’s stated objective was to conduct a best-value competition based upon a clear-cut set of criteria. We are seriously concerned that this did not happen,” Hudson said in the release. BAE has built more than 56,000 FMTVs over the last 17 years so the company has a great deal vested in this award. If you want to do the legislative geography, BAE Systems employs 3,200 people on the FMTV program at facilities in Texas, Ohio and Michigan.

The GAO must rule on the protests by Dec. 14. Although the acquisition community continues to insist that very few contract awards are ever protested, ATL has consistently declined to release the figures proving this, arguing that they are very difficult to compile.

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Join the Conversation

:sigh: ATL? Association of Teachers and Lecturers? Atlas Transformation Language? William B Hartsfeld International Airport?

“Linda Hudson, president of land and armaments, said the company “did not take lightly” the decision to protest the award to Oshkosh.”

Well, of course she’d say that. What do you expect, she’d say “yeah we pretty much just crapped this protest out as standard procedure, in fact we had the letter drafted and ready to go six months before the award date”

Density,

I am still waiting for a company to declare that they planned for a protest from the beginning and their lawyers readied the papers within hours of learning they lost. My wait may extend for some time, I’m guessing.

Protests are inevitable unless Congress acts to change the law. Does anyone think that CSAR-X would be in production today if not for the protests that ensued after the source selection?

Something is wrong when we can’t buy a truck.

I think the M142 HIMARS can be usefull in any future-large type of war , say Korean, Chineese or Rusian war type of usage. It can be usefull for future defense.

This one seemed pretty likely to be protested if anyone but BAE won. After all, they designed the truck in the first place and have been producing it for years. For that matter they will continue to make it until Oshkosh ramps up production. At least the government was smart enough to buy and retain the rights to the entire design on the truck, so they can compete it in the first place.

Doesnt OshKosh have enough to do?? starting to look like somebody knows somebody, hmmm

Recon:

Something is wrong when that truck has a unit cost of over 100k.……

Ish… our military should have the best trucks we can get but that is absurd.

@Bill,
Have you priced a large commercial truck lately, let alone one that can go cross country? And the contract is not just for a barebones truck. Seems reasonable to me.

Someones’ brother-in-law must have a design that they want to push so the Bro-in-law can stop borrowing money. This company has ‚for years, produced trucks trhat are very good, meet and exceed reqs and aren’t a problem to service when and if maint becomes a necessity.

Stop what you are making, I smell a acorn in the pot.….….

I worked S&S on the program, and they screwed up in reverse: The drawing package was marginally acceptable, but bad enough that it made competing bids difficult.

My guess is that Oshkosh buckled down, and redid the drawings on their own dime.

Resurrect the duece-n-half. New Cat engine, new allisson 645 tranny. Cheap workhorse that proved itself since WWII, Korea, and ‘Nam. Cheap. easily repaired and if need be, disposable.

Oshkosh sucks the Big One.

hey rob BAE SUCKS

Not only that, but the cabs are also armored, which requires a lot of metal and specialty manufacturing.

*required

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement