<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: V-22 Ready for Action: Boeing</title> <atom:link href="http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/09/14/v-22-ready-for-action-boeing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/09/14/v-22-ready-for-action-boeing/</link> <description>Online Defense and Acquisition Journal</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:24:54 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Tumbling</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/09/14/v-22-ready-for-action-boeing/comment-page-1/#comment-16106</link> <dc:creator>Tumbling</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:44:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=9555#comment-16106</guid> <description>All those other issues aside..... where&#039;s the gun.....? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All those other issues aside.…. where’s the gun.….?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: daskro</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/09/14/v-22-ready-for-action-boeing/comment-page-1/#comment-15945</link> <dc:creator>daskro</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:12:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=9555#comment-15945</guid> <description>What is the source of the fairings issue with the C-17?
Also what are your thoughts on the c-17&#039;s readiness rate compared to the C-5? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the source of the fairings issue with the C-17?<br
/> Also what are your thoughts on the c-17’s readiness rate compared to the C-5?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Wrenchturner</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/09/14/v-22-ready-for-action-boeing/comment-page-1/#comment-15942</link> <dc:creator>Wrenchturner</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:55:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=9555#comment-15942</guid> <description>Am I missing sumptin here or what? This program is right inline with programs such as Stryker. Bloated, failed to meet expectations or logistical goals ala C17 transportability and continually shoved through by politicians more interested in the economies of their districts then utility in the field.
Why are we surprised when these systems don&#039;t perform as expected?
Case: we put composited fairings on the lower fuselage of the C17 and wonder why we have high rate of mechanical casualties operating in the Afghan theatre. Don&#039;t these procurement strategist ever get out of the D ring?
Or, are we expecting the new and expensive crop of ac to do more then is reasonable?
Maybe some of all the above. It&#039;s still being flown all over Iraq loaded up on low density alt conditions.
I&#039;ll reserve critical opinion til I see OFFICIAL readiness reports. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I missing sumptin here or what? This program is right inline with programs such as Stryker. Bloated, failed to meet expectations or logistical goals ala C17 transportability and continually shoved through by politicians more interested in the economies of their districts then utility in the field.<br
/> Why are we surprised when these systems don’t perform as expected?</p><p>Case: we put composited fairings on the lower fuselage of the C17 and wonder why we have high rate of mechanical casualties operating in the Afghan theatre. Don’t these procurement strategist ever get out of the D ring?</p><p>Or, are we expecting the new and expensive crop of ac to do more then is reasonable?</p><p>Maybe some of all the above. It’s still being flown all over Iraq loaded up on low density alt conditions.</p><p>I’ll reserve critical opinion til I see OFFICIAL readiness reports.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Vacaville</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/09/14/v-22-ready-for-action-boeing/comment-page-1/#comment-15165</link> <dc:creator>Vacaville</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 01:13:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=9555#comment-15165</guid> <description>Mr. Cunningham is pocketed millions of dollars working on this failed program.  Ask him why readiness rates for squadrons in the USA were even lower than those in Iraq. They were not subject to &#039;harsh conditions&quot; nor &quot;combat.&quot; sic. yes, he really said &quot;combat.&quot;
The answer is that after four years V-22s are so broke down they must be retired. That is why half of the 156 V-22s the Corps has purchased are not in service. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Cunningham is pocketed millions of dollars working on this failed program.  Ask him why readiness rates for squadrons in the USA were even lower than those in Iraq. They were not subject to ‘harsh conditions” nor “combat.” sic. yes, he really said “combat.”</p><p>The answer is that after four years V-22s are so broke down they must be retired. That is why half of the 156 V-22s the Corps has purchased are not in service.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dilbert</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/09/14/v-22-ready-for-action-boeing/comment-page-1/#comment-15161</link> <dc:creator>Dilbert</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:29:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=9555#comment-15161</guid> <description>They have been flying these things since 1989. They have flown them over 60,000 hours, including desert conditions. They are still broke down half the time, and can only carry half as much as promised. Bell and Boeing are making billions &quot;fixing&quot; this thing, and will do so until it is retired. Just buy more CH-53Ks that will enter production soon at half the price, with twice the range and five times the payload.
The only people who say positive things about the V-22 are corporate spokesmen or Marines whose career is tied to the V-22. You never hear any Marine gripe about the V-22 to the media, because he will get hit with NJP for disobeying an order and sent to a remote Iraqi outpost the next day. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have been flying these things since 1989. They have flown them over 60,000 hours, including desert conditions. They are still broke down half the time, and can only carry half as much as promised. Bell and Boeing are making billions “fixing” this thing, and will do so until it is retired. Just buy more CH-53Ks that will enter production soon at half the price, with twice the range and five times the payload.</p><p>The only people who say positive things about the V-22 are corporate spokesmen or Marines whose career is tied to the V-22. You never hear any Marine gripe about the V-22 to the media, because he will get hit with NJP for disobeying an order and sent to a remote Iraqi outpost the next day.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: killer</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/09/14/v-22-ready-for-action-boeing/comment-page-1/#comment-15099</link> <dc:creator>killer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 02:02:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=9555#comment-15099</guid> <description>The ITV s the osprey is supposed to transport would be ideal for Afghan terrain. There is the LSV and the PM
The PM tows a 120mm Mortar it seems our men could use this kind of fire power. I wonder what there waiting for? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ITV s the osprey is supposed to transport would be ideal for Afghan terrain. There is the LSV and the PM<br
/> The PM tows a 120mm Mortar it seems our men could use this kind of fire power. I wonder what there waiting for?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: CombatCrewChief</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/09/14/v-22-ready-for-action-boeing/comment-page-1/#comment-15098</link> <dc:creator>CombatCrewChief</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 01:59:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=9555#comment-15098</guid> <description>They promised a 300mph aircraft that could drop 24 combat loaded Marines off over the horizon.
We got an aircraft that is the size of a H-53 with the lift capability of a H-60 and has less range then a H-47.  Oh, and it can&#039;t operate in thin mountain air.
No 300mph. No 24 Marine capability.  For the low, low price of $100,000,000 dollars each.  We could buy one each of the above with that money.  And they can fly in Afghanistan.  They&#039;re doing it right now.
As for the guys who fix it and fly it?  They&#039;d deploy with M1 Garands and H-34s if that&#039;s all they had.  It&#039;s up to us to give them the best and to hold the mil-ind. complex responsible for their errors.  This is one of those errors. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They promised a 300mph aircraft that could drop 24 combat loaded Marines off over the horizon.</p><p>We got an aircraft that is the size of a H-53 with the lift capability of a H-60 and has less range then a H-47.  Oh, and it can’t operate in thin mountain air.</p><p>No 300mph. No 24 Marine capability.  For the low, low price of $100,000,000 dollars each.  We could buy one each of the above with that money.  And they can fly in Afghanistan.  They’re doing it right now.</p><p>As for the guys who fix it and fly it?  They’d deploy with M1 Garands and H-34s if that’s all they had.  It’s up to us to give them the best and to hold the mil-ind. complex responsible for their errors.  This is one of those errors.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Solomon</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/09/14/v-22-ready-for-action-boeing/comment-page-1/#comment-15094</link> <dc:creator>Solomon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 01:48:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=9555#comment-15094</guid> <description>A few ITVs have made it to units.  Supposedly its going to Afghanistan soon, if it isn&#039;t already there.
I read the comments and wonder why the negativity?  I&#039;ve seen the testimony from the guys that fly the thing and they say its good to go.  Has any of the critics flown the airplane?  Performed maintenance on it?  Or are these knee jerk reactions and a case of taking popular positions? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few ITVs have made it to units.  Supposedly its going to Afghanistan soon, if it isn’t already there.</p><p>I read the comments and wonder why the negativity?  I’ve seen the testimony from the guys that fly the thing and they say its good to go.  Has any of the critics flown the airplane?  Performed maintenance on it?  Or are these knee jerk reactions and a case of taking popular positions?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: killer</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/09/14/v-22-ready-for-action-boeing/comment-page-1/#comment-15092</link> <dc:creator>killer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 00:15:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=9555#comment-15092</guid> <description>What happened to the ITVs the osprey was supposed to carry? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happened to the ITVs the osprey was supposed to carry?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: killer</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/09/14/v-22-ready-for-action-boeing/comment-page-1/#comment-15093</link> <dc:creator>killer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 00:15:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=9555#comment-15093</guid> <description>What happened to the ITVs the osprey was supposed to carry? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happened to the ITVs the osprey was supposed to carry?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/09/14/v-22-ready-for-action-boeing/comment-page-1/#comment-14842</link> <dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 22:07:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=9555#comment-14842</guid> <description>I can say they work, they have been practicing ops here! Lets just say they are far from base right now. Well at least 2 are, they seemed to perform very well. The neighbors don&#039;t like the rotor wash though,lol.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can say they work, they have been practicing ops here! Lets just say they are far from base right now. Well at least 2 are, they seemed to perform very well. The neighbors don’t like the rotor wash though,lol.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: CombatCrewChief</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/09/14/v-22-ready-for-action-boeing/comment-page-1/#comment-14787</link> <dc:creator>CombatCrewChief</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 07:56:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=9555#comment-14787</guid> <description>Kipling wrote a stanza I never understood until now:When you’re trapped in a burning osprey on Afghanistan’s plains,
because in flight the V-22 failed to remain,
jus’ roll to your M4 an’ blow out your brains,
An’ go to your gawd like a soldier.I’d like to see Bell-Boeing take 24 combat loaded superfans to an Afghan-like LZ in an osprey to show us how safe this bird is. Any takers?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kipling wrote a stanza I never understood until now:</p><p>When you’re trapped in a burning osprey on Afghanistan’s plains,<br
/> because in flight the V-22 failed to remain,<br
/> jus’ roll to your M4 an’ blow out your brains,<br
/> An’ go to your gawd like a soldier.</p><p>I’d like to see Bell-Boeing take 24 combat loaded superfans to an Afghan-like LZ in an osprey to show us how safe this bird is. Any takers?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: 0IFOEFshepard</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/09/14/v-22-ready-for-action-boeing/comment-page-1/#comment-14134</link> <dc:creator>0IFOEFshepard</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:46:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=9555#comment-14134</guid> <description>The question is why is it not in Afghanistan?Gee this thing is so great debate is pointless if it is sitting in a hangar at Cherry Point, NC.Unless we are making North Carolina the main front for the war against AQ. Are we?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question is why is it not in Afghanistan?</p><p> Gee this thing is so great debate is pointless if it is sitting in a hangar at Cherry Point, NC.</p><p> Unless we are making North Carolina the main front for the war against AQ. Are we?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jimbo</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/09/14/v-22-ready-for-action-boeing/comment-page-1/#comment-14132</link> <dc:creator>jimbo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:27:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=9555#comment-14132</guid> <description>the thing flys, and does what its supposed to do... but they havnt hammered out repairs and logistics of parts... nuff said</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the thing flys, and does what its supposed to do… but they havnt hammered out repairs and logistics of parts… nuff said</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: pennst98</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/09/14/v-22-ready-for-action-boeing/comment-page-1/#comment-14130</link> <dc:creator>pennst98</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:45:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=9555#comment-14130</guid> <description>Every time I read about this darn aircraft I&#039;m left feeling like I&#039;m either reading propaganda written to get me to believe this thing is the greatest thing since slice bread, or I’m reading an incoherent list of complaints which are worrying but don’t necessarily = cancellation...The craft works or it doesn’t. (Period) Logistics and Sustainment issues can be dealt with, an airframe that just isn’t up to the task can’t. WHICH IS IT? Surely someone can illuminate me.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every time I read about this darn aircraft I’m left feeling like I’m either reading propaganda written to get me to believe this thing is the greatest thing since slice bread, or I’m reading an incoherent list of complaints which are worrying but don’t necessarily = cancellation…</p><p>The craft works or it doesn’t. (Period) Logistics and Sustainment issues can be dealt with, an airframe that just isn’t up to the task can’t. WHICH IS IT? Surely someone can illuminate me.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: 0IFOEFshepard</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/09/14/v-22-ready-for-action-boeing/comment-page-1/#comment-14117</link> <dc:creator>0IFOEFshepard</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:42:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=9555#comment-14117</guid> <description>This is a total load of crap. Why does this piece of equipment need a year to recover from IRAQ before it will barely drag itself with its special staff to the main front.
Bottom line The Osprey was not ready for the AFGHAN front , especially when it  is hot.                                                The most expensive war machine in US history was left at Cherry Point NC. That is the Reality</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a total load of crap. Why does this piece of equipment need a year to recover from IRAQ before it will barely drag itself with its special staff to the main front.</p><p> Bottom line The Osprey was not ready for the AFGHAN front , especially when it  is hot.                                                The most expensive war machine in US history was left at Cherry Point NC. That is the Reality</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: TB</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/09/14/v-22-ready-for-action-boeing/comment-page-1/#comment-14093</link> <dc:creator>TB</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:09:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=9555#comment-14093</guid> <description>Re: bad parts planningHow could they not project how parts would behave in Iraq?  We wear the crap out of our hardware in the Southwest US all the damn time.  If they bothered to fly the plane at 29 Palms in the summer for a few weeks and they should have had a pretty good idea.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: bad parts planning</p><p>How could they not project how parts would behave in Iraq?  We wear the crap out of our hardware in the Southwest US all the damn time.  If they bothered to fly the plane at 29 Palms in the summer for a few weeks and they should have had a pretty good idea.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dow</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/09/14/v-22-ready-for-action-boeing/comment-page-1/#comment-14091</link> <dc:creator>Dow</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:22:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=9555#comment-14091</guid> <description>Townes does not know the diff between a v-22 and an f-22.  Neither does barry osbama.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Townes does not know the diff between a v-22 and an f-22.  Neither does barry osbama.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 12/37 queries in 0.023 seconds using apc

Served from: cloud-milcom-web1.hspheredns.com @ 2010-03-15 11:30:08 -->