AF Chief Pushes Ethics, ‘The Only Path’

AF Chief Pushes Ethics, ‘The Only Path’

Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Norton Schwartz revealed in his major speech at the Air Force Association conference that the service began a wide-ranging technology study to come up with approaches that may help the service answer some of its pressing mission challenges and help find technologies “that should underwrite our future.”.

Schwartz told reporters after the speech that the study is being led by the service’s chief scientist, Werner Dahm. The horizon study was launched in July and should be finished by “next summer.” One promising technology ahs already been identified, Schwartz said. “Virtual machines” could be used to help protect the utility and integrity of the services’ networks. “That technology is close at hand. I would not have known about that if our chief scientist had not told me,” Schwartz noted.

Schwartz also addressed a wide range of other acquisition issues, including that the Quadrennial Defense Review may result in the service losing some capabilities it hoped to develop. “It may e that in many areas we might, in (Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Gen. James) Hoss Cartwright’s word, not end get as exquisite systems as perhaps” the service had planned for.

Schwartz on other programs:

The tanker RFP: Speaking personally, Schwartz said he wants the Air Force to run the KC-X program “but ultimately this is a decision for the Secretary of Defense to decide.” He also said service had done a much better job of communicating with the companies since the GAO protest was issued. “I think Jim Albaugh (Boeing) and Ron Sugar (Northrop Grumman) and Paul Meyer (Northrop) will tell you that there has been far better communication than had been the case…” he said.

Asked whether he expected a protest once the RFP comes out, Schwartz said the “the companies will do what they have to do. Do you think we would put out an RFP that would not be near foolproof?”

On the C-130 upgrade: Schwartz confirmed that the service had killed the C-130 AMP program, saying “the bottom line is we couldn’t afford it.” Instead of installing a state of the art glass cockpit, the service will now install collision avoidance and an air traffic beacon.

Finally, Schwartz focused in his AFA speech on ethics, saying the “only one path to take… is the straight path, strictly in accordance with the law. We have also learned that our reputation is fragile” and bad acts “reverberate for years.” Watch for the tanker RFP to come out in the next few weeks and see if Schwartz has come up with the right people possessed of the right attitudes and expertise.

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Join the Conversation

Good Morning Folks,

The big news here is General Schwartz’s ethics statement, a first, I would like to see Adm Mullens and the other service chiefs make the same statements and for Sec. Gates to hold them to it.

Duty, Honor and Country, and Do not lie, cheat, steal nor tolerate those that do, might become more then just a legacy saying from an idealized past.

ALLONS,
Byron Skinner

Couldn’t agree more Skinner! (ALLONS)

I’m still waiting for the usual USAF solution; a no bid IDIQ contract award to Boeing for the immediate delivery of unspecified number of Ethical Souls, LMAO!!

While I agree with the statement on ethics, I am concerned that he has placed ethics within the confines of what is lawful. The ethical thing to do might be illegal and the legal thing just might be unethical. We make a mistake when the ethics advisors to Generals and Admirals are lawyers. Ethics must be seen as something larger and different than legal.

Just another flyboy, I guess. He literally equates being ethical with following the law. All that is is being lawful. Ethics goes a step beyond. It goes to values and morals and has more gray that a law with its words on paper. Especially with his responsibilities. Gen Schwartz should learn the real meaning of ethics, not just staying within the law. I can only wonder how many conversations he has been in during his career that he was told to forget or deny ever took place.

*required

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement