<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Schwartz Cool on F-22 Export</title> <atom:link href="http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/09/15/schwartz-cool-on-f-22-export/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/09/15/schwartz-cool-on-f-22-export/</link> <description>Online Defense and Acquisition Journal</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:54:34 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Eagleeyes</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/09/15/schwartz-cool-on-f-22-export/#comment-14634</link> <dc:creator>Eagleeyes</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:26:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=9755#comment-14634</guid> <description>The next Generation Fighter will be cheaper, no pilot, meaning no environmental and egress systems to buy and maintain. They will be RPV&#039;s, just spares and ground crew support. Cheaper to build or put back into technology advancements. Will be able to out performed manned aircraft in dogfights, pull higher G&#039;s, etc...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The next Generation Fighter will be cheaper, no pilot, meaning no environmental and egress systems to buy and maintain. They will be RPV’s, just spares and ground crew support. Cheaper to build or put back into technology advancements. Will be able to out performed manned aircraft in dogfights, pull higher G’s, etc…</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: SEOOO!</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/09/15/schwartz-cool-on-f-22-export/#comment-14283</link> <dc:creator>SEOOO!</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 02:47:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=9755#comment-14283</guid> <description>187 F-22 aircraft from simple to Russia or China-type T-50 and SU 35</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>187 F-22 aircraft from simple to Russia or China-type T-50 and SU 35</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris M</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/09/15/schwartz-cool-on-f-22-export/#comment-14185</link> <dc:creator>Chris M</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:23:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=9755#comment-14185</guid> <description>The Truth of the Matter is, with a Democratic controlled Congress, and a democrat President, defense takes a back burner as it always has. We are giving money to social programs, banks, and car companies.We need A thousand and got two hundred, you can be assured the Russians and Chinese will build a thousand each of their next aircraft and we will be hopelessly trying to spread what we have left around the globe to counter that threat.Our F-15, F-16, and F-18 programs are seeing an extreme amount of use in what has been a 16 year air war in the middle east and now Afghanistan, those airframes are seeing alot of hours earlier than originally expected.Where do we go from here? The F-35 program has not produced thier five flying aircraft for this year, but the F-22 program is up and functional. It doesn&#039;t take a genius to figure it out.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Truth of the Matter is, with a Democratic controlled Congress, and a democrat President, defense takes a back burner as it always has. We are giving money to social programs, banks, and car companies.</p><p> We need A thousand and got two hundred, you can be assured the Russians and Chinese will build a thousand each of their next aircraft and we will be hopelessly trying to spread what we have left around the globe to counter that threat.</p><p> Our F-15, F-16, and F-18 programs are seeing an extreme amount of use in what has been a 16 year air war in the middle east and now Afghanistan, those airframes are seeing alot of hours earlier than originally expected.</p><p>Where do we go from here? The F-35 program has not produced thier five flying aircraft for this year, but the F-22 program is up and functional. It doesn’t take a genius to figure it out.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: pfcem</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/09/15/schwartz-cool-on-f-22-export/#comment-14166</link> <dc:creator>pfcem</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 06:57:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=9755#comment-14166</guid> <description>TB,I think you ae reading it incorrectly.  The US is in danger of being surpassed without the F-22 &amp; F-35.No, even if the F-22 cost &#039;only&#039; $50 million we would still have ended up with less than 500 of them.  Cost is a red herring, the true reason for cutting the F-22 has NOTHING to do with how much it costs.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TB,</p><p>I think you ae reading it incorrectly.  The US is in danger of being surpassed without the F-22 &amp; F-35.</p><p>No, even if the F-22 cost ‘only’ $50 million we would still have ended up with less than 500 of them.  Cost is a red herring, the true reason for cutting the F-22 has NOTHING to do with how much it costs.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: TB</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/09/15/schwartz-cool-on-f-22-export/#comment-14161</link> <dc:creator>TB</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 03:48:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=9755#comment-14161</guid> <description>Not so fast Recon, according to the Air Force brass in the other blog, the F-22 and F-35 are in danger of being surpassed and we should spend hundreds of millions on another handful of planes.We built thousands of planes in the past because for one thing, they didn&#039;t cost an arm and a leg per copy.  If the F-22 had a price tag of say $50 million we&#039;d have a thousand of them on order.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not so fast Recon, according to the Air Force brass in the other blog, the F-22 and F-35 are in danger of being surpassed and we should spend hundreds of millions on another handful of planes.</p><p>We built thousands of planes in the past because for one thing, they didn’t cost an arm and a leg per copy.  If the F-22 had a price tag of say $50 million we’d have a thousand of them on order.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ReconTeam</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/09/15/schwartz-cool-on-f-22-export/#comment-14158</link> <dc:creator>ReconTeam</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 03:20:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=9755#comment-14158</guid> <description>True Drake, and this wouldn&#039;t be a problem if we had some common sense. The production line should stay up and running.We once built tens of thousands of fighters back in World War II. Even decades later we built over 5000 F-4 Phantom II fighters. Don&#039;t tell me we can&#039;t produce enough F-22s to meet USAF requirements. Hell, I think we should go further and built 850 or more of them! It is an amazing aircraft with unrivaled capability.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True Drake, and this wouldn’t be a problem if we had some common sense. The production line should stay up and running.</p><p>We once built tens of thousands of fighters back in World War II. Even decades later we built over 5000 F-4 Phantom II fighters. Don’t tell me we can’t produce enough F-22s to meet USAF requirements. Hell, I think we should go further and built 850 or more of them! It is an amazing aircraft with unrivaled capability.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Drake1</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/09/15/schwartz-cool-on-f-22-export/#comment-14155</link> <dc:creator>Drake1</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 02:03:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=9755#comment-14155</guid> <description>Export F-22 is just a back door towards keeping the F-22 production line alive. If the line were alive and pumping, no one would care about Australia and Japan.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Export F-22 is just a back door towards keeping the F-22 production line alive. If the line were alive and pumping, no one would care about Australia and Japan.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: dow</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/09/15/schwartz-cool-on-f-22-export/#comment-14148</link> <dc:creator>dow</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:26:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=9755#comment-14148</guid> <description>Barry may not like China tires competing with his union thug buddies but he sure does not want American allies like Japan and Australia to compete militarily with his chicomm comrades.....</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barry may not like China tires competing with his union thug buddies but he sure does not want American allies like Japan and Australia to compete militarily with his chicomm comrades.….</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.005 seconds using apc
Object Caching 684/685 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.dodbuzz.com

Served from: dodbuzz.com @ 2012-02-09 08:07:37 -->
