<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: US-PRC Militaries Talking Again</title> <atom:link href="http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/09/15/us-china-resume-military-talks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/09/15/us-china-resume-military-talks/</link> <description>Online Defense and Acquisition Journal</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:05:17 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: pennst98</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/09/15/us-china-resume-military-talks/comment-page-1/#comment-14190</link> <dc:creator>pennst98</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:07:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=9718#comment-14190</guid> <description>Keep your friends close and your enemies closer....whichever you think China is this is a good idea.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.…whichever you think China is this is a good idea.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Drake1</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/09/15/us-china-resume-military-talks/comment-page-1/#comment-14128</link> <dc:creator>Drake1</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:20:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=9718#comment-14128</guid> <description>This stuff is all about lessening incidents in disputed waters and perhaps trying to ward of the militarization of space. Chinese and American international priorities are pretty much diametrically opposed, unless you count piracy.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This stuff is all about lessening incidents in disputed waters and perhaps trying to ward of the militarization of space. Chinese and American international priorities are pretty much diametrically opposed, unless you count piracy.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alex</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/09/15/us-china-resume-military-talks/comment-page-1/#comment-14125</link> <dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:05:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=9718#comment-14125</guid> <description>I really do hope we forge a closer military alliance with China.  They could be an extremely valuable ally in places like Afghanistan and North Korea, especially given that they probably don&#039;t have nearly the same aversion to conflict as our Western European &quot;allies&quot; do.  If we are really lucky, China will stop selling weapons to our enemies (but I won&#039;t get my hopes up for that).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really do hope we forge a closer military alliance with China.  They could be an extremely valuable ally in places like Afghanistan and North Korea, especially given that they probably don’t have nearly the same aversion to conflict as our Western European “allies” do.  If we are really lucky, China will stop selling weapons to our enemies (but I won’t get my hopes up for that).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 12/22 queries in 0.011 seconds using apc

Served from: cloud-milcom-web1.hspheredns.com @ 2010-03-18 16:05:44 -->