Hill Pork Meisters Retreat, A Little

Hill Pork Meisters Retreat, A Little

The House and Senate Armed Services Committees have taken a small but significant step to eliminate – well, almost – one of the most outrageous congressional behaviors in defense legislation.

For years, these committees have raided the Pentagon’s critical Operation and Maintenance accounts to offset the cost of earmarks (pork) they add to their bills.

A major part of the O&M budget pays for training, weapons maintenance, food, fuel, spare parts, and all the other things troops need when they go to war. Even though O&M spending is the budgetary embodiment of “Support Our Troops,” and even though research on these raids has been around for years, no one paid the slightest attention and the appalling behavior continued.


For example, the House and Senate Armed Services Committees added over 900 earmarks altogether to their defense bills. The House committee added 502 earmarks, and the Senate committee added 426. To help offset their cost, the House committee reduced O&M by $1.9 billion; the Senate committee raided O&M by $2.0 billion.

Then, the press started paying attention to research (reported at Military​.com, the Huffington Post, and the website of the Straus Military Reform Project) about all this. The Washington Post and Congressional Quarterly made references to the behavior. The matter was brought up by Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) and a few others in the debates in the Senate on this year’s defense bills, and then the Washington Times ran a front page story about the issue.

The jig was up. Under the emerging public glare, the House and Senate Armed Services Committees cleaned up their act. In the final version of their 2010 bill – the “conference report” — they dropped the various phony pretexts they had used to cut O&M spending. Gone were “civilian under-execution” (pretending DoD wasn’t hiring civilians when it was actually hiring more: cut over $500 million), fuel cost reductions (pretending worldwide fuel prices would decline by a known amount: cut over $200 million), and “unobligated balances” (declaring money DoD had not yet spent to be forever excess: cut hundreds and hundreds of $millions). These and the other gimmicks were (almost) all gone. Just a, relatively speaking, small $100 million reduction for those yet-to-be-obligated unobligated balances remained.

That’s the good news.

They did end up reducing the President’s request for O&M. Obama asked for $156.4 billion; they cut that by $264 million. Anyone paying the slightest attention knows each of the military services need major increases for training and maintenance.

They also did not take their pork out of the bill. The conference report lists about 900 House and Senate earmarks. There was no meaningful effort to reduce them. The Armed Services Committees simply shifted the burden of paying for most of them to other accounts.

It is also very important to note that little else changed. These committees still have our defenses on the same course they have been on for decades. That is not a good thing; our forces have been growing smaller, older, and less ready to fight – at increasing overall cost – for decades. The increasing dollar bloat continues to buy a weaker force.

The worst news is that even though the Armed Services Committees may have taken a small, constructive step, it may amount to nothing.

Those committees don’t control the money. The appropriations committees do. The authorization bill from the House and Senate Armed Services Committees is a policy bill that only recommends funding levels. Most people don’t know it, but their dollar figures are purely advisory.

To whom does this advice go? In the House, it goes to the Ultra-Porker, John Murtha (D-Penn), chairman of the House Appropriations defense subcommittee. Murtha, of course is the subject of much reporting questioning his ethics and actions. Many defense watchers will not be surprised to see him indicted in the not too distant future. In the Senate, the appropriators are led by Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii) whose typically gentlemanly behavior coexists with some of the most voracious porking for Hawaii that I have seen in more than 30 years on Capitol Hill.

The House and Senate Appropriations Committee are now in conference resolving the differences in their bills, each of which raided O&M for billions of dollars. The Armed Services Committees have laid out a different path for themselves: Make the pork, not O&M, pay for itself. It is a small step, but it is very much worth taking – if you have any decency. It will be interesting to see what the appropriators do. We should all pay attention.

Winslow Wheeler is director of the Straus Military Reform Project of the Center for Defense Information in Washington.

Join the Conversation

Congress can’t be trusted.…the real embarassment to our nation! Everyone still thinks the President runs the nation…little do they know that Congress is in charge!

thank God the president doesnt run the nation,he has no idea or does he care about the military

President Barack Obama is pressuring Congressional officials to stop adding pork to appropriations bill. In my opinion he isn’t pushing hard enough. But he is probably the very first president to openly oppose this disgusting practice. Thank goodness we have a new administration.

Respectfully,

Daniel Russ
Civilianmilitaryintelligencegroup​.com

Dan, you’re talking about the same president who as a Senator voted for the barely oversighted TARP bill which handed hundreds billions of dollars to badly run banks and as president signed off on the trillion dollar “stimulus” which has yet to do anything other than spend money on Congress’ pet projects. Go back through his voting record and see how many spending bills he voted for which has put us trillions futher into the red.

Despite apparently working on the Hill for a number of years, Mr. Wheeler obviously has no understanding at all of the types of accounts, the scoring associated with each, and that you can’t move $2B in O&M to fund earmarks in R&D or Procurement within budget rules. Just another example of a self-described do-gooder spewing misinformation and recklessly throwing out allegations without foundation. No one listened to Wheeler when he worked in the Senate and no one should listen to him now! He is a jerk!

US Strategic Command is the worst pork barrel meister in US military history. $500 million a year thrown down the drain since 1992. StratCom was Colin Powell’s brainchild, so you know they have not accomplished a thing in 17 years. Over $6 billion wasted and they cannot account for over $2.5 billion of their pork, lost to their notorious corruption, nepotism and mismanagement. Their comptroller and his cabal should be in Leavenworth doing 20 years of hard labor.

Actually, Global Insight (recognized as one of the most accurate forcasting companies in the world) has recently stated that the stimulus package is actually doing more than people think in terms of jobs and jobs retained. The stimulus should have been larger according to many economists, yes, but whose fault is that? I’m sure Obama could have pushed harder for a larger stimulus, but I doubt the American people or the GOP would have let him — if you look at the overblown reaction people are having to the deficit and the way most react to nonsensical analysis if repeated over and over again by news agencies that don’t have a clue about complex issues, this would have cost him even more. Of course, you can’t expect people to understand these things, search for other sources of information rather than Fox News, Drudge Report and the Heritage Foundation, or even understand that the future is nearly impossible to predict. TARP did rescue the world from a financial meltdown, so it really wasn’t that bad considering the alternative (also note that people can’t predict the future and TARP was a response to a problem that had to be dealt with IMMEDIATELY). Here’s how I know you REALLY don’t know what your talking about… large deficits in times of high to normal GDP growth and large deficits in times of low GDP growth and recessionary conditions ARE COMPLETELY DIFFERENT. Moron.

Ummmm.… they are talking about money BEFORE IT IS APPROPRIATED. YOU are the one that has no idea what you’re talking about. After it is appropriated, yes, it can’t just be thrown to R&D, MILCON, etc. This report isn’t talking about that. Think!

*required

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

AdChoices | Like us on , follow us on and join us on Google+
© 2014 Military Advantage
A Monster Company.