<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Hill Aides Call For JSF Restructure</title> <atom:link href="http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/10/23/hill-aides-call-for-jsf-restructure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/10/23/hill-aides-call-for-jsf-restructure/</link> <description>Online Defense and Acquisition Journal</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:27:53 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: jim</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/10/23/hill-aides-call-for-jsf-restructure/comment-page-2/#comment-16565</link> <dc:creator>jim</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:17:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=10837#comment-16565</guid> <description>Yeah, I agree with the F-22/F-35, the high/low figher mix, but I think from a logical standpoint we should have way more F-22 to complement a much cheaper and far less stealthier, but longer ranging battlefield interdiction bomber than what the F-35 has become today.  If you look at how much money has been poured into the F-35 to make it &quot;stealth&quot; it seems like a waste.  The end result is an aircraft that is only stealthy from the frontal aspect and is still not able to penetrate an integrated air defense network with any hope of survival.  The F-22 can.  We need a High/Low mix that is actually effective.  What good are 1500 expensive semi stealthy F-35&#039;s if they are incapable of defeating current generation Sukoi S-35&#039;s?  I never got the arguments people had for the F-22.  It was trashed as being too expensive, and yes it did cost more than expected.  However, the F-35 gets praised.  Yet the F-35 is WAY over budget, under-capable with too many visions of what its mission should be, and made obsolete even before entering service due to Russian improvements in the Flanker and the SA-20 air defense systems.
My logic is, that with stealth, unless you go full fledged to make it an all aspect stealth airframe, then it isn&#039;t worth the additional costs when you balance it against the minor capability improvements.
I don&#039;t think people have, to date, looked at the F-35 program objectively.  I&#039;m sure now with the F-22 done, people might start to take notice of the train wreak that the JSF program has become. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I agree with the F-22/F-35, the high/low figher mix, but I think from a logical standpoint we should have way more F-22 to complement a much cheaper and far less stealthier, but longer ranging battlefield interdiction bomber than what the F-35 has become today.  If you look at how much money has been poured into the F-35 to make it “stealth” it seems like a waste.  The end result is an aircraft that is only stealthy from the frontal aspect and is still not able to penetrate an integrated air defense network with any hope of survival.  The F-22 can.  We need a High/Low mix that is actually effective.  What good are 1500 expensive semi stealthy F-35’s if they are incapable of defeating current generation Sukoi S-35’s?  I never got the arguments people had for the F-22.  It was trashed as being too expensive, and yes it did cost more than expected.  However, the F-35 gets praised.  Yet the F-35 is WAY over budget, under-capable with too many visions of what its mission should be, and made obsolete even before entering service due to Russian improvements in the Flanker and the SA-20 air defense systems.</p><p>My logic is, that with stealth, unless you go full fledged to make it an all aspect stealth airframe, then it isn’t worth the additional costs when you balance it against the minor capability improvements.</p><p>I don’t think people have, to date, looked at the F-35 program objectively.  I’m sure now with the F-22 done, people might start to take notice of the train wreak that the JSF program has become.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: roland</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/10/23/hill-aides-call-for-jsf-restructure/comment-page-2/#comment-16449</link> <dc:creator>roland</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:17:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=10837#comment-16449</guid> <description>With the looming problem with Iran, N. Korea and with possible conflict with its allies, war in Afghanistan and Pakistan I think we needed these Planes ASAP. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the looming problem with Iran, N. Korea and with possible conflict with its allies, war in Afghanistan and Pakistan I think we needed these Planes ASAP.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Steve Dixon</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/10/23/hill-aides-call-for-jsf-restructure/comment-page-2/#comment-15957</link> <dc:creator>Steve Dixon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:24:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=10837#comment-15957</guid> <description>Jeez Bill - I think you&#039;re just a little harsh mate.   Is it (even remotely) possible that &quot;they&quot; really did think WMD&#039;s existed in Iraq?   I mean Saddam had more than ample opportunity to allow inspectors to do a proper search for WMD&#039;s but what did he do?   He flipped the bird to the entire world and failed to understand that by doing so ammounted to what was seen as an admission that he either had them or was developing them.   You must remember that that GOOSE had already used WMD&#039;s on more than one occasion.
It&#039;s been a while since I&#039;ve admired any of your Presidents (and very few of our own Prime Ministers) but I really think you guys are too harsh in some ways.   I haven&#039;t seen ANYTHING from your new guy to impress me yet.
What we all need is a Political Party that&#039;s not left OR right wing who&#039;s ONE &amp; ONLY GOAL IS THE BETTERMENT OF THEIR COUNTRY.
So let&#039;s get back on-topic shall we?
...and &quot;That&#039;s all I have to say about that!&quot; </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeez Bill — I think you’re just a little harsh mate.   Is it (even remotely) possible that “they” really did think WMD’s existed in Iraq?   I mean Saddam had more than ample opportunity to allow inspectors to do a proper search for WMD’s but what did he do?   He flipped the bird to the entire world and failed to understand that by doing so ammounted to what was seen as an admission that he either had them or was developing them.   You must remember that that GOOSE had already used WMD’s on more than one occasion.<br
/> It’s been a while since I’ve admired any of your Presidents (and very few of our own Prime Ministers) but I really think you guys are too harsh in some ways.   I haven’t seen ANYTHING from your new guy to impress me yet.<br
/> What we all need is a Political Party that’s not left OR right wing who’s ONE &amp; ONLY GOAL IS THE BETTERMENT OF THEIR COUNTRY.</p><p>So let’s get back on-topic shall we?</p><p>…and “That’s all I have to say about that!”</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bill</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/10/23/hill-aides-call-for-jsf-restructure/comment-page-2/#comment-15954</link> <dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:24:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=10837#comment-15954</guid> <description>And as far as not being cut out for the job, it does not excuse the fact that he deserted his post. He took a billet that could have been filled by someone who probably went to VN in his place and may not have come home. I would be willing to bet if you or I decided we did not like our job when we were in uniform and simply left that we would not be in a position to run for any kind of civil office. Felons are not allowed to hold high public office.Now for foaming at the mouth goes, they and the whole crew of that cabal should be tried for war crimes and crimes against humanity. In the Nuremburg trials water boarding was consider a crime. Just because a Fascist regime writes laws that say its ok to break the law does not excuse or give them right to do so.You can say what ever you wish Col. about those of us on the left, we both fought and served for that right. You can distort the truth about the last regime; they were very good at that too, but you cannot hid the fact that they lied to get us in a war. Which in reality is more of an occupation than a war? For what? So some deserter and a draft dodger can strut their stuff and call themselves war time leaders when all they are, are chicken hawks: This mess has cost the lives of thousands of civilians, and wasted the blood of our brave young warriors and run this country into deep into debt by several trillion dollars. So when you talk about foaming at the mouth, remember three things, 1.It was on their watch that 911 happened even when warned in advance. 2. There were no nukes, that was all a put up deal, 3 Any historian will tell you that with the last regime, it is the closest that we have ever come to having the our constitution subverted and this Nation we both love so much becoming a Fascist State.In the words of forest Gump, that is all I have to say about that.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And as far as not being cut out for the job, it does not excuse the fact that he deserted his post. He took a billet that could have been filled by someone who probably went to VN in his place and may not have come home. I would be willing to bet if you or I decided we did not like our job when we were in uniform and simply left that we would not be in a position to run for any kind of civil office. Felons are not allowed to hold high public office.</p><p>Now for foaming at the mouth goes, they and the whole crew of that cabal should be tried for war crimes and crimes against humanity. In the Nuremburg trials water boarding was consider a crime. Just because a Fascist regime writes laws that say its ok to break the law does not excuse or give them right to do so.</p><p>You can say what ever you wish Col. about those of us on the left, we both fought and served for that right. You can distort the truth about the last regime; they were very good at that too, but you cannot hid the fact that they lied to get us in a war. Which in reality is more of an occupation than a war? For what? So some deserter and a draft dodger can strut their stuff and call themselves war time leaders when all they are, are chicken hawks: This mess has cost the lives of thousands of civilians, and wasted the blood of our brave young warriors and run this country into deep into debt by several trillion dollars. So when you talk about foaming at the mouth, remember three things, 1.It was on their watch that 911 happened even when warned in advance. 2. There were no nukes, that was all a put up deal, 3 Any historian will tell you that with the last regime, it is the closest that we have ever come to having the our constitution subverted and this Nation we both love so much becoming a Fascist State.</p><p>In the words of forest Gump, that is all I have to say about that.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bill</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/10/23/hill-aides-call-for-jsf-restructure/comment-page-2/#comment-15953</link> <dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:20:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=10837#comment-15953</guid> <description>Col I am not hear to argue with you, you obivously have your postion and I have mine. The F-22 and F-35 are way to expenisve for what the tax payer is getting. The maint down time far exceeds what the F-15&amp;16 per flight hour. The avionics have problems yet to be worked out.Most of the capret bombing that was done was done by the BUF&#039;s. The B1B was not designed for large conventional pay loads.As far as the body armor goes, when my neighbors son asked his dad to see if he can get him body armor becase he does not have any speaks volums as to the value the past administration put on the lives of our troops.And while I partialy agree with your observation on the humvees, that does not deminish the fact that the are called watermellons by the troops because they are green on the outside and red from the troops blood on the inside. All because a lack of armor</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Col I am not hear to argue with you, you obivously have your postion and I have mine. The F-22 and F-35 are way to expenisve for what the tax payer is getting. The maint down time far exceeds what the F-15&amp;16 per flight hour. The avionics have problems yet to be worked out.</p><p>Most of the capret bombing that was done was done by the BUF’s. The B1B was not designed for large conventional pay loads.</p><p>As far as the body armor goes, when my neighbors son asked his dad to see if he can get him body armor becase he does not have any speaks volums as to the value the past administration put on the lives of our troops.</p><p>And while I partialy agree with your observation on the humvees, that does not deminish the fact that the are called watermellons by the troops because they are green on the outside and red from the troops blood on the inside. All because a lack of armor</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Colonial-Marine</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/10/23/hill-aides-call-for-jsf-restructure/comment-page-2/#comment-15909</link> <dc:creator>Colonial-Marine</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 06:59:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=10837#comment-15909</guid> <description>Actually we have used the B-1B a ton. In Afghanistan it has provided a tremendous amount of ground support. And we still need new aircraft too, you simply cannot keep a plane flying forever. We need more F-22s to replace F-15s and we need F-35s to replace F-16s. Sooner or later we are going to need a new strategic bomber too.
Also regarding the HMMWV situation, the military cannot be blamed for the lack of armored HMMWVs in the beginning of the war. The HMMWV was never intended to be an armored car. And if all of our supply units are driving around in armored vehicles, it reduces the amount of gear they can bring up to the front. It made sense from a logistics standpoint although it was not suited for COIN operations in both Afghanistan and Iraq.
Likewise, the lack of body armor among support and rear-line units was excusable for an Army prepared to fight conventional wars. What is not excusable were the delays in getting new equipment up to the front.
The last president did not desert his duty, he was simply not cut out for the job, much like Obama. Meanwhile Rumsfield and Cheney may have been fools, but they were not guilty of crimes against humanity despite what the far left will foam at the mouth at. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually we have used the B-1B a ton. In Afghanistan it has provided a tremendous amount of ground support. And we still need new aircraft too, you simply cannot keep a plane flying forever. We need more F-22s to replace F-15s and we need F-35s to replace F-16s. Sooner or later we are going to need a new strategic bomber too.</p><p>Also regarding the HMMWV situation, the military cannot be blamed for the lack of armored HMMWVs in the beginning of the war. The HMMWV was never intended to be an armored car. And if all of our supply units are driving around in armored vehicles, it reduces the amount of gear they can bring up to the front. It made sense from a logistics standpoint although it was not suited for COIN operations in both Afghanistan and Iraq.</p><p>Likewise, the lack of body armor among support and rear-line units was excusable for an Army prepared to fight conventional wars. What is not excusable were the delays in getting new equipment up to the front.</p><p>The last president did not desert his duty, he was simply not cut out for the job, much like Obama. Meanwhile Rumsfield and Cheney may have been fools, but they were not guilty of crimes against humanity despite what the far left will foam at the mouth at.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: roland</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/10/23/hill-aides-call-for-jsf-restructure/comment-page-2/#comment-15904</link> <dc:creator>roland</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 03:38:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=10837#comment-15904</guid> <description>We have a lot of F-14&#039;s, why not recycle this planes to F-22 and F-35. Therby lowering the cost budget. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have a lot of F-14’s, why not recycle this planes to F-22 and F-35. Therby lowering the cost budget.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bill</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/10/23/hill-aides-call-for-jsf-restructure/comment-page-2/#comment-15891</link> <dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:52:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=10837#comment-15891</guid> <description>This whole thing is not about The F-22 or the F-35, it&#039;s about the fat cats getting fatter and the congressman or senator in those districts getting re-elected. Neither one of this birds are all that good if you look at the cost and the maint. hrs. required for each sortie. Like the B-1, we will never use them or need them. Give the B$ to the guys and gals who put themselves in harms way, buy better helmets with liners so our actors and actress do not have to chip in and buy them, send them to war with suitable body armor so the parents don’t have to buy it. Don’t make them go to a junkyard to find enough scrap metal to protect them in their Humvees.Yes somethings have changed thanks the citizens and the news getting involved, like in our number one veterans hospital with green slime in the toilets. GI&#039;s who kill their spouses 2 weeks after being home because they are afraid to seek mental health.That is where the money needs to go, not in to the pockets of some corp. or bureaucrat and people like Six deferment Dick and rummy the dummy not being tried for dereliction of duty, war crimes and crimes against humanly. If you want to start calling Presidents names, how about desertion of duty like the last one?We can argue all of this or non of this, but none of it will mean s--- if we don’t start electing people who will represent the people and honor their job and country instead of the damn dollar And worry about who is scratching whos back in order to get ahead while the country and its military suffer.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This whole thing is not about The F-22 or the F-35, it’s about the fat cats getting fatter and the congressman or senator in those districts getting re-elected. Neither one of this birds are all that good if you look at the cost and the maint. hrs. required for each sortie. Like the B-1, we will never use them or need them. Give the B$ to the guys and gals who put themselves in harms way, buy better helmets with liners so our actors and actress do not have to chip in and buy them, send them to war with suitable body armor so the parents don’t have to buy it. Don’t make them go to a junkyard to find enough scrap metal to protect them in their Humvees.</p><p>Yes somethings have changed thanks the citizens and the news getting involved, like in our number one veterans hospital with green slime in the toilets. GI’s who kill their spouses 2 weeks after being home because they are afraid to seek mental health.</p><p>That is where the money needs to go, not in to the pockets of some corp. or bureaucrat and people like Six deferment Dick and rummy the dummy not being tried for dereliction of duty, war crimes and crimes against humanly. If you want to start calling Presidents names, how about desertion of duty like the last one?</p><p>We can argue all of this or non of this, but none of it will mean s— if we don’t start electing people who will represent the people and honor their job and country instead of the damn dollar And worry about who is scratching whos back in order to get ahead while the country and its military suffer.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Weaponhead</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/10/23/hill-aides-call-for-jsf-restructure/comment-page-2/#comment-15890</link> <dc:creator>Weaponhead</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:14:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=10837#comment-15890</guid> <description>Pretty amazing that the F-35 JPO and LMCO said that they learned all the lessons on F-22 and the F-35 would therefore come in on-time and on cost.  This is another &#039;keep sholving $Bs&quot; and eventually you will get something type of program ala F-22 &amp; JASSM.  As for legacy assumptions on flight testing, F-35 has  been in SDD  fight testing for three years.  These 3 years have proven that the &quot;legacy assumptions&quot; are if anything optimistic for the F-35 program and has also proven that the F-35 program has no idea how to predict flight testing progress. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty amazing that the F-35 JPO and LMCO said that they learned all the lessons on F-22 and the F-35 would therefore come in on-time and on cost.  This is another ‘keep sholving $Bs” and eventually you will get something type of program ala F-22 &amp; JASSM.  As for legacy assumptions on flight testing, F-35 has  been in SDD  fight testing for three years.  These 3 years have proven that the “legacy assumptions” are if anything optimistic for the F-35 program and has also proven that the F-35 program has no idea how to predict flight testing progress.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: VPRONE</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/10/23/hill-aides-call-for-jsf-restructure/comment-page-2/#comment-15886</link> <dc:creator>VPRONE</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 11:53:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=10837#comment-15886</guid> <description>Tell the pilots that fly into combat that the stealth tech is not needed, better yet tell his wife! As in any project, the better it is the more it costs, IE Bose surround sound $2500.00 other companies $400.00 - $1500.00. You get what you pay for. As for the F-15 and F-18&#039;s they are out dated and our foes have better ones. You prevent invasions by having bigger and better weapons than your foes. Ask a historian why Japan did not want to invade mainland America and they&#039;ll say the Japanese felt that &quot;behind every blade of grass is a gun&quot;. When you have the most of the best, it keeps your foes out of your back yard. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell the pilots that fly into combat that the stealth tech is not needed, better yet tell his wife! As in any project, the better it is the more it costs, IE Bose surround sound $2500.00 other companies $400.00 — $1500.00. You get what you pay for. As for the F-15 and F-18’s they are out dated and our foes have better ones. You prevent invasions by having bigger and better weapons than your foes. Ask a historian why Japan did not want to invade mainland America and they’ll say the Japanese felt that “behind every blade of grass is a gun”. When you have the most of the best, it keeps your foes out of your back yard.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Cole</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/10/23/hill-aides-call-for-jsf-restructure/comment-page-2/#comment-15884</link> <dc:creator>Cole</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 04:17:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=10837#comment-15884</guid> <description>Mark, how much background does one need to comprehend that 186 F-22s and thousands of U.S. and allied F-35s are more than up to task against the &quot;daunting&quot; list of countries and fighters cited earlier in this thread (and many of those to include India, Vietnam, and Ukraine are friends).COL(R) Ehrhard has some good ideas but adding 99 more F-22s to give up 905 F-35As is not one of them at a savings of just $50-65 billion. Is that what keeps the USAF from bleeding white? Whatever happened to quantity having a quality all its own?BTW, I had already scanned his document a month ago, and read all the Australian stuff and Bill Sweetman and ELP rants and forum arguments. How do you think I knew all the L-Band &quot;threat&quot; counterarguments.Pretty amazing how an aircraft replete with F-22 lessons, engineers, and R&amp;D is &quot;high risk&quot; and China/Russia aerospace is a done deal.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, how much background does one need to comprehend that 186 F-22s and thousands of U.S. and allied F-35s are more than up to task against the “daunting” list of countries and fighters cited earlier in this thread (and many of those to include India, Vietnam, and Ukraine are friends).</p><p>COL® Ehrhard has some good ideas but adding 99 more F-22s to give up 905 F-35As is not one of them at a savings of just $50–65 billion. Is that what keeps the USAF from bleeding white? Whatever happened to quantity having a quality all its own?</p><p>BTW, I had already scanned his document a month ago, and read all the Australian stuff and Bill Sweetman and ELP rants and forum arguments. How do you think I knew all the L-Band “threat” counterarguments.</p><p>Pretty amazing how an aircraft replete with F-22 lessons, engineers, and R&amp;D is “high risk” and China/Russia aerospace is a done deal.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Trophy</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/10/23/hill-aides-call-for-jsf-restructure/comment-page-2/#comment-15883</link> <dc:creator>Trophy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 03:35:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=10837#comment-15883</guid> <description>That was due to flawed doctrine and training along with unreliable IFF equipment... buying too much into an unproven technology. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was due to flawed doctrine and training along with unreliable IFF equipment… buying too much into an unproven technology.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gregg R</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/10/23/hill-aides-call-for-jsf-restructure/comment-page-1/#comment-15881</link> <dc:creator>Gregg R</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:47:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=10837#comment-15881</guid> <description>F-22/F-35 is not a high-low mix:  It is a Super-high/Very-high mix.  The bottom line is that a P-51 with a GPS guided bomb can give me everything I need CAS-wise for the COIN fight and we really only need to be able to establish superiority at the point of contact vs anyone else flying gen 4+ aircraft.  183 quarter billion dollar airplanes are more than enough to do that.  When we&#039;re already burning 3/4 trillion dollars per year on two wars and the military base budget, we absolutely CANNOT afford to burn trillions more on hundreds of extra airframes that are way more advanced than they really need to be to do the job that they&#039;ll actually have to do. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>F-22/F-35 is not a high-low mix:  It is a Super-high/Very-high mix.  The bottom line is that a P-51 with a GPS guided bomb can give me everything I need CAS-wise for the COIN fight and we really only need to be able to establish superiority at the point of contact vs anyone else flying gen 4+ aircraft.  183 quarter billion dollar airplanes are more than enough to do that.  When we’re already burning 3/4 trillion dollars per year on two wars and the military base budget, we absolutely CANNOT afford to burn trillions more on hundreds of extra airframes that are way more advanced than they really need to be to do the job that they’ll actually have to do.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mark</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/10/23/hill-aides-call-for-jsf-restructure/comment-page-1/#comment-15880</link> <dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:30:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=10837#comment-15880</guid> <description>Cole,
Suggest you read Tom Ehrhard&#039;s white paper on long term AF strategy (CSBA). Tom is special asst to CSAF. His history lesson the AF is pretty accurate as is the amount of money the AF budget has coughed up to the ARMY (something you constantly bleat about). I agree with part of his solution to the AF force structure in part, the part about cutting the F35, adding a few more F22s, adding long range ISR &amp; strike and a few others. Read the article...you might learn something instead of speculating about stuff for which you have little real info or backgroun. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cole,<br
/> Suggest you read Tom Ehrhard’s white paper on long term AF strategy (CSBA). Tom is special asst to CSAF. His history lesson the AF is pretty accurate as is the amount of money the AF budget has coughed up to the ARMY (something you constantly bleat about). I agree with part of his solution to the AF force structure in part, the part about cutting the F35, adding a few more F22s, adding long range ISR &amp; strike and a few others. Read the article…you might learn something instead of speculating about stuff for which you have little real info or backgroun.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris the Patriot</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/10/23/hill-aides-call-for-jsf-restructure/comment-page-2/#comment-15879</link> <dc:creator>Chris the Patriot </dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 23:11:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=10837#comment-15879</guid> <description>Wonder Weapons...
Wasn&#039;t that what partly contributed to the fall of the Nazi&#039;s ?
Didn&#039;t we (and the Soviets) win WWII with massive numbers of affordable built war materials and men?
Didn&#039;t Eisenhower warn us about the Military Industrial Complex?
Considering our economy, the state our nation is in and the rise of other world powers with China and a renewed Russia, even India and Brazil on a smaller scale or the good old EU...
How can we be so blind to the historical lessons of the past?
Are we just like the Roman Empire? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonder Weapons…</p><p>Wasn’t that what partly contributed to the fall of the Nazi’s ?</p><p>Didn’t we (and the Soviets) win WWII with massive numbers of affordable built war materials and men?</p><p>Didn’t Eisenhower warn us about the Military Industrial Complex?</p><p>Considering our economy, the state our nation is in and the rise of other world powers with China and a renewed Russia, even India and Brazil on a smaller scale or the good old EU…</p><p>How can we be so blind to the historical lessons of the past?</p><p>Are we just like the Roman Empire?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ray Von</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/10/23/hill-aides-call-for-jsf-restructure/comment-page-2/#comment-15878</link> <dc:creator>Ray Von</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 22:59:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=10837#comment-15878</guid> <description>Are you kidding me build more F-18&#039;s and F-15&#039;s? Your talking about a legacy airframe complete with leagacy avionics. The F-35 is by far the most advanced fighter ever built. The Avionics alone in the F-35 are far more advanced than even the F-22.  A single F-35 Will be able to target and destroy as many as 5 targets at 1 time .Stealth alone will allow the F-35 to dominate the air and acquire the ever coveted 1st shot
You would like a Mustang to replace a Corvette.... there is no comparison.Senators and Congressmen balk at a  $80 million price tag of a F-35 , and $50 Billion for the entire fleet of 2,400 F-35;s but have no problem dumping 700 Billion into a sinking Credit Crad Companys. Or 100 Billion into Cash For Clunkers , and even better $150 Billion for Car Companys etc etc.
FYI: We still have 4 or 5 different aircraft Companys in the United States : Lockheed , Northrop , Boeing , Douglas , Fairchild etc </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you kidding me build more F-18’s and F-15’s? Your talking about a legacy airframe complete with leagacy avionics. The F-35 is by far the most advanced fighter ever built. The Avionics alone in the F-35 are far more advanced than even the F-22.  A single F-35 Will be able to target and destroy as many as 5 targets at 1 time .Stealth alone will allow the F-35 to dominate the air and acquire the ever coveted 1st shot<br
/> You would like a Mustang to replace a Corvette.… there is no comparison.Senators and Congressmen balk at a  $80 million price tag of a F-35 , and $50 Billion for the entire fleet of 2,400 F-35;s but have no problem dumping 700 Billion into a sinking Credit Crad Companys. Or 100 Billion into Cash For Clunkers , and even better $150 Billion for Car Companys etc etc.<br
/> FYI: We still have 4 or 5 different aircraft Companys in the United States : Lockheed , Northrop , Boeing , Douglas , Fairchild etc</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: RocketSci</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/10/23/hill-aides-call-for-jsf-restructure/comment-page-2/#comment-15840</link> <dc:creator>RocketSci</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 03:43:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=10837#comment-15840</guid> <description>We can agree or disagree on military policy but what got to me was Wright&#039;s comments about &quot;Mr. Obama&#039;s Muslim allies&quot;. I work in the defense indusrty so I know about ups and downs. I know it quite well because I just recently got laid off from a defense firm.  And you&#039;re right, we&#039;re back to the old&quot; guns and butter &quot; debate from Economics 101. But just because someone thinks we&#039;re spending too much money on the military and little on something els edoesn&#039;t make him anti-American or less of a patriot. I&#039;m just sick of th ename calling, that&#039;s all. You want to debate the merits of F22 and F-35 great. But let&#039;s keep this name calling to a minimum. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can agree or disagree on military policy but what got to me was Wright’s comments about “Mr. Obama’s Muslim allies”. I work in the defense indusrty so I know about ups and downs. I know it quite well because I just recently got laid off from a defense firm.  And you’re right, we’re back to the old” guns and butter ” debate from Economics 101. But just because someone thinks we’re spending too much money on the military and little on something els edoesn’t make him anti-American or less of a patriot. I’m just sick of th ename calling, that’s all. You want to debate the merits of F22 and F-35 great. But let’s keep this name calling to a minimum.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Colonial-Marine</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/10/23/hill-aides-call-for-jsf-restructure/comment-page-2/#comment-15833</link> <dc:creator>Colonial-Marine</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 23:39:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=10837#comment-15833</guid> <description>Honestly RocketSci, anytime the Dems have been in power (in recent history) the defense industry is hit hard in a very bad way. I live by companies like Pratt and Whitney and Electric Boat and they are already feeling the strain. Obama doesn&#039;t give a damn about our air superiority, and Gates hatred of the F-22 program played into his hands. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly RocketSci, anytime the Dems have been in power (in recent history) the defense industry is hit hard in a very bad way. I live by companies like Pratt and Whitney and Electric Boat and they are already feeling the strain. Obama doesn’t give a damn about our air superiority, and Gates hatred of the F-22 program played into his hands.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: RocketSci</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/10/23/hill-aides-call-for-jsf-restructure/comment-page-2/#comment-15831</link> <dc:creator>RocketSci</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:26:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=10837#comment-15831</guid> <description>I can&#039;t believe you just said that. It only shows your ignorance. First of all gates was appointed by Bush not Obama. If he were this soft-headed anti-war person you make him out to be he wouldn&#039;t have reappointed Gates but would have picked some left wing weanie  It was the Bush White House that started the moves to shut down the F-22.  The overrun on the F-35 occurred on Bush and Rumsfeld&#039;s watch. So let&#039;s stop with the name calling and discuss facts. i suspect Mmr Wright that you aren&#039;t in the military because I know aactive military would speak in that manner about the duly elected Commander-in-Chief. You want to call him an idiot -- that&#039;s your right. You want to call him a left wing fool. Fine. But do not call him a traitor. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can’t believe you just said that. It only shows your ignorance. First of all gates was appointed by Bush not Obama. If he were this soft-headed anti-war person you make him out to be he wouldn’t have reappointed Gates but would have picked some left wing weanie  It was the Bush White House that started the moves to shut down the F-22.  The overrun on the F-35 occurred on Bush and Rumsfeld’s watch. So let’s stop with the name calling and discuss facts. i suspect Mmr Wright that you aren’t in the military because I know aactive military would speak in that manner about the duly elected Commander-in-Chief. You want to call him an idiot — that’s your right. You want to call him a left wing fool. Fine. But do not call him a traitor.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jim Wright</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/10/23/hill-aides-call-for-jsf-restructure/comment-page-2/#comment-15823</link> <dc:creator>Jim Wright</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:32:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=10837#comment-15823</guid> <description>What you really entended to say was that now that the F-22 was canceled all that Mr. Obama and his allies in congress need is an excuse to kill this program too so that they can deny equipment need to keep the military strong to defend the United States from Mr. Obama&#039;s Muslim allies.  That is one of his Changes. He is no friend of this country. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What you really entended to say was that now that the F-22 was canceled all that Mr. Obama and his allies in congress need is an excuse to kill this program too so that they can deny equipment need to keep the military strong to defend the United States from Mr. Obama’s Muslim allies.  That is one of his Changes. He is no friend of this country.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 14/47 queries in 0.141 seconds using apc

Served from: cloud-milcom-web1.hspheredns.com @ 2010-03-10 19:45:34 -->