<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Rumors Fly About JSF Second Engine</title> <atom:link href="http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/11/02/just-how-bad-are-f136-problems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/11/02/just-how-bad-are-f136-problems/</link> <description>Online Defense and Acquisition Journal</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:20:46 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Arthurn Gain</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/11/02/just-how-bad-are-f136-problems/#comment-17684</link> <dc:creator>Arthurn Gain</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 04:42:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=11018#comment-17684</guid> <description>as you would know only to well,the moment you start to wring the engines neck you will obviously start having serious issues with the &quot;lifed items&quot; carried over from previous design parameters of Raptor eng, certain components of this eng are not able to handle higher workload stresses. These issues must be resolved before delivery. Rgds Arth. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as you would know only to well,the moment you start to wring the engines neck you will obviously start having serious issues with the “lifed items” carried over from previous design parameters of Raptor eng, certain components of this eng are not able to handle higher workload stresses. These issues must be resolved before delivery. Rgds Arth.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Turbineguy</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/11/02/just-how-bad-are-f136-problems/#comment-16062</link> <dc:creator>Turbineguy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:07:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=11018#comment-16062</guid> <description>Jeff, are you suggesting the F135 design doesn&#039;t work? It&#039;s based on the F119 powering the F-22, which seems to be working quite well (at least in that application). </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, are you suggesting the F135 design doesn’t work? It’s based on the F119 powering the F-22, which seems to be working quite well (at least in that application).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Megatron</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/11/02/just-how-bad-are-f136-problems/#comment-15956</link> <dc:creator>Megatron</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:15:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=11018#comment-15956</guid> <description>The f136 has multi-national content and therefore multi-national support. I suspect this is key.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The f136 has multi-national content and therefore multi-national support. I suspect this is key.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jeff</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/11/02/just-how-bad-are-f136-problems/#comment-15894</link> <dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:06:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=11018#comment-15894</guid> <description>I&#039;m always for doing things that will save money, thats the intended goal of having two viable engine designs. How much cheaper will the F136 have to be and how much would Pratt and Whittney really have to come down on the price of the F135 as a result of that competition to make the pay off? Or what type of improvement in performance is worth the amount of money thats been dumped into a failing design. Some supporters point to the F136&#039;s possible superior temperature margins, but the question is if Pratt and Whittney had been given the additional dollars the F136 has recieved, maybe they could have made improvements to match it? At least they&#039;d be starting from a design that works. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m always for doing things that will save money, thats the intended goal of having two viable engine designs. How much cheaper will the F136 have to be and how much would Pratt and Whittney really have to come down on the price of the F135 as a result of that competition to make the pay off? Or what type of improvement in performance is worth the amount of money thats been dumped into a failing design.</p><p>Some supporters point to the F136’s possible superior temperature margins, but the question is if Pratt and Whittney had been given the additional dollars the F136 has recieved, maybe they could have made improvements to match it? At least they’d be starting from a design that works.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.004 seconds using apc
Object Caching 640/641 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.dodbuzz.com

Served from: dodbuzz.com @ 2012-02-09 09:36:57 -->
