Film Offers Gospel of the Surge

Film Offers Gospel of the Surge

President Obama will announce his new strategy on Afghanistan and Pakistan sooner or later. Given that the key decision — at least publicly — will be how many more troops to send to Afghanistan it seems propitious to consider the Bush administration’s decision to surge roughly 30,000 troops to Iraq.

Just what did the surge accomplish and how did it work. A new Washington thinktank the Institute For the Study Of War — which some might consider The Surge thinktank — produced a movie called “The Surge: The Untold Story,” to answer just those questions.

To get some idea just how closely identified the institute is with the surge, consider that retired Army Gen. Jack Keane, a chief architect of the surge, Frederick Kagan, scholar at the American Enterprise Institute and an early surge advocate, and Liz Cheney, former principal deputy assistant secretary of State for Near Eastern affairs and daughter of former Vice President Dick Cheney are board members of the institute and attended the first screening of the movie. And, of course, Frederick Kagan’s wife, Kim Kagan, is the institute’s president.


Perhaps the most salient point to come out of the surge movie was that the increase in troops made possible penetration of Iraqi neighborhoods that had been largely left uncontested by American and Iraqi forces. Troops moved from their forward operating bases to the villages and neighborhoods infested by insurgents, militias and Al Qaeda in Iraq.

This was the clear portion of clear, hold, build. But many people seem to forget or never knew that sending US troops to the worst parts of the worst neighborhoods — those that were controlled by militias or where Al Qaeda in Iraq swept through capturing and killing — involved serious combined arms slugfests.

Abrams tanks, Bradley Fighting Vehicles, Strykers and other vehicles went in with dismounted troops and shot and blasted their way against pretty determined foes who knew every inch of the territory.

Once U.S. troops and Iraqi forces were in, they built command outposts that gave them a good view of the neighborhood and allowed them to defend the posts they built right in the middle of the nastiest spots.

To provide residents with more assurance of safety and to better control the flow of insurgents and their supplies, the US and Iraqis restricted access to neighborhoods using concrete barriers and guarded points of entry.

At the same time, U.S. and Iraqi troops started going house to house for tea and intelligence, making it impossible for insurgents to target any one house or family. And they held and they built. In many areas, each phase of the COIN approach went ahead simultaneously.

But Jack Keane told the audience after the film that COIN strategy was not sufficient by itself. It had to be coupled with “vigorous strikes” against Al Qaeda in Iraq. That was the specialty of the Joint Special Operations Command, then led by Gen. Stanley McChrystal, now the commander in Afghanistan.

At the same time as all this was unfolding, the US teamed with the Iraqi government to train 125,000 Iraqi forces to join the fight. “That is a surge in itself and we couldn’t succeed without it,” Keane said. That effort was led by then-Lt. Gen. James Dubik, commander of Multinational Security Transition Command, who spoke after Keane.

Dubik said one of his greatest challenges — aside from training these troops in the middle of a war — was working with the Iraqis to figure out how big the force needed to be, how it was trained, how it was sustained, how it was developed and, lastly but not least, how the money was spent. Dubik said gearing everyone up to use the money was very challenging and would loom as a key test for the US in Afghanistan.

The surge may not have made Iraq safe for democracy and peace, but it did radically change the political and military dynamics in Iraq, giving the Iraqis breathing room to act, consolidate their gains and decide just what kind of a country they want.

Should we achieve that much in Afghanistan with a surge there it would mark another major victory for US forces and prove to allies and competitors that the United States can defeat irregular enemies and possesses a creative, flexible and potent force, backed by an impressive national security apparatus.

Join the Conversation

osbama wants the USA and especially her defender the US Military humiliated.

The central conviction of Obama’s ideology is that America is guilty of limitless moral failures and is the chief architect of the world’s ills. Obama has boundless enmity for America, its key institutions, and its longtime allies.

When the H*** are the people who support our current president going to wake up and see this guy isn’t fit to be commander in chief? It’s not his fault; he’s a community organizer.
That being said somebody’s got to remind him men are dying while he try’s to figure out a way to placate the dangerous whack jobs on the extreme left from staging a coup; when he does the right thing in Afghanistan. What happened to what he said when he asked people to vote him where he said this the war we need to fight.
You have two choices mr president fight, or pull these good men out NOW.

Bronco if you want to sent troop then you get of yours and go fight

Bronco, you make the point: sent more troops or get out.
Robert, you make the point: don’t drink and post.

Stryker
I may not be the sharpest knife in the draw but I have gone and fought for this country in a useless war can you say that as you want to send everyone else over to fight

Well I fought … twice and I saw alot of good done and a lot of mistakes made. I also saw leadership that learned from those mistakes. the Surge was part of the very expensive lessons we learned.

Well there’s good arguments for staying, and good arguments for pulling out all troops immediately.

First off, we will ignore press & publicity, mainly because in the long run it is meaningless.

For staying:

Well currently america is a war economy. The military-industrial sector is doing very well, spending is up, and arms exports are at an all-time high. This means jobs, income and a strong military (and thus the ability to tell people what to do). Pulling out would immediately have negative results for the arms industry, as funding would get cut, programs would be shut down and acquisition would be scaled back. Strategically america would also have to give up having a major prescence in both afghanistan and iraq, which could have negative effects in future tensions with russia (which will start getting serious in about 5 years or so) and iran.

For leaving:

America has already achieved its objective of destabilising the middle-east to the point where all the different sub-groups are at each others throats. This way no one single country or alliance that will be formed that will be able to rise and stand up to america on a military, economic or political level. As long as the region remains unstable enough to prevent this from happening, but stable enough to supply oil, as far as america is concerned, it’s all good. Also this move would boost public opinion of the current leadership allowing them to be re-elected (keep your eyes peeled for that as the next election cycle starts approaching).

Surge or no surge doesn’t really make a difference at this point…look to the President to split the difference and send 20,000–30,000 troops max.

Actually Robert I can say that I have fought for my country with 32 months combined in combat and 23 years active service. So we are straight – that is front line duty on the ground in Iraq. Again, I stand by my post… President Obama needs to show leadership and make a decision.

To the poster “WarScientist” :

You wrote: “For leaving: ”

You mean, the U.S.A. could hold on indefinitely to Iraq and Afghanistan if they wanted to, “because they have that option” ?

In 1968, you had over 500.000 soldiers in Vietnam, plus heavy bombers, tens of thousands of helicopters and chemical weapons, and left.

i am sick of hearing new strategy’s announced.… gotlucky​.net, http://​www​.gotlucky​.net

does the film/video mention buying off the Sunni tribes? wasn’t that the primary victory?
pete saussy

We have an extraordinary military with the brightest and best who are organized, equipped, and trained to fight on a front line as they advance forward.

We are not facing an organized force in uniform.

We are in a regionally organized country with porous borders where tribal boundaries cross the lines in almost impassable terrain.

The Soviets killed about 1 million Afghans and bombed them back to grass soup.

Although we recognize the roots of war are economic, we talk to Nation Building but we are not organized, equipped, or trained to do that.

Meanwhile we’re heavily in debt.

So I don’t think the way ahead is clear nor are the decisions easy.

The only thing I can see working are fortified villages with re-establishing the agricultural infrastructure.

you are all complete doodles

I’m a half-wit, and I don’t know that! In fact, It is quite obvious, from Obama’s actions and statements, that he dislikes this exceptional country, it’s glorious achievement of a workable the republican model of government, the concept of a constitutionally-defined and limited government, the free market system, and personal responsibility and the freedom that it engenders. Don’t feel so bad — like you, many people voted for the big, blank unknown (mostly because they didn’t bother to look beyond the facade to the character within) hoping he would be a change for the better, and are now devastated to discover that the change they voted in is taking this country to ruin. You can redeem yourself in the next election by voting in a government of laws, not of (a) man. In the meantime, pray fervently for the preservation of this shining city on the hill.

Eric, you my friend, are seeing things from a blind location.… you probably get tingles all up and down your legs whenever Obama speaks. It is time for people like Jet, Guest, and me to take back our country from liberal know nothings. Our country is being destroyed by your ILK. So I say to Jet, Guest and anyone else… It is not enough to bitch about Obama and his crew of slugs… we must remove them from power, we must be active and we must take our country back NOW. We have to get out the vote, we have to put people of integrity, honesty, and conservative values into power.

“Klotzen, nicht kleckern”

- Heinz Guderian

“Treat ‘em rough”.

- The motto of the US Army Tank Corps in WWI.

*required

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement