<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Arms Control: It’s Back and Hot!</title> <atom:link href="http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/11/arms-control-its-back-and-hot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/11/arms-control-its-back-and-hot/</link> <description>Online Defense and Acquisition Journal</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:50:35 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: BOOMER</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/11/arms-control-its-back-and-hot/#comment-18595</link> <dc:creator>BOOMER</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:30:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=12116#comment-18595</guid> <description>The TRIDENT fleet needs the neccessary funding to maintain and upgrade these boats,  repair and storrage facilities. They are one of our greatest assets of keeping us safe, despite the politicians thinking that they are the ones doing it. We have already been cut down by liberal treaty agreements reducing us down to the bare minimum. WE went from the 41 for freedom boomer fleet down to 10, we let the Russinas take away the Tomahawk ALPHA because they didnt see it as fair us having a weapon they could not detect or defend against or give them a chance to retaliate. They cut the submarine force budgets down to minimal so they could move the funds to other pet pee programs. Politicians need to stay out of military affairs and just find away to get our troops what they need to keep us safe. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The TRIDENT fleet needs the neccessary funding to maintain and upgrade these boats,  repair and storrage facilities. They are one of our greatest assets of keeping us safe, despite the politicians thinking that they are the ones doing it. We have already been cut down by liberal treaty agreements reducing us down to the bare minimum. WE went from the 41 for freedom boomer fleet down to 10, we let the Russinas take away the Tomahawk ALPHA because they didnt see it as fair us having a weapon they could not detect or defend against or give them a chance to retaliate. They cut the submarine force budgets down to minimal so they could move the funds to other pet pee programs. Politicians need to stay out of military affairs and just find away to get our troops what they need to keep us safe.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: William C.</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/11/arms-control-its-back-and-hot/#comment-18480</link> <dc:creator>William C.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 03:09:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=12116#comment-18480</guid> <description>Further cuts to the nuclear arsenal are unfeasible without a modernization of our nuclear systems. And of course one must wonder the utility of such cuts at this time when there is a greater danger from countries like North Korea using a nuke, rather than the Russian Federation starting World War III. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Further cuts to the nuclear arsenal are unfeasible without a modernization of our nuclear systems. And of course one must wonder the utility of such cuts at this time when there is a greater danger from countries like North Korea using a nuke, rather than the Russian Federation starting World War III.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Drake1</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/11/arms-control-its-back-and-hot/#comment-18474</link> <dc:creator>Drake1</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 20:50:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=12116#comment-18474</guid> <description>The Administration scored a win with the JASON report ( which seemed to squash the concerns of the Secretary of Defense and company), but the NNSA surveillance program is currently a mess and in need of revamp and/or funds. I&#039;m also eagerly awaiting the Nuclear Posture Review coming in the summer. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Administration scored a win with the JASON report ( which seemed to squash the concerns of the Secretary of Defense and company), but the NNSA surveillance program is currently a mess and in need of revamp and/or funds.</p><p>I’m also eagerly awaiting the Nuclear Posture Review coming in the summer.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: dow</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/11/arms-control-its-back-and-hot/#comment-18473</link> <dc:creator>dow</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:50:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=12116#comment-18473</guid> <description>of course barry wants unilateral disarmament of the USA - just remember USofKKA Jerimiah Wright is barry&#039;s mentor. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>of course barry wants unilateral disarmament of the USA — just remember USofKKA Jerimiah Wright is barry’s mentor.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.005 seconds using apc
Object Caching 640/641 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.dodbuzz.com

Served from: dodbuzz.com @ 2012-02-09 09:01:51 -->
