<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: DoD Dodges Budget Bullet</title> <atom:link href="http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/26/dod-dodges-budget-bullet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/26/dod-dodges-budget-bullet/</link> <description>Online Defense and Acquisition Journal</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:26:09 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: jakedar1</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/26/dod-dodges-budget-bullet/#comment-19139</link> <dc:creator>jakedar1</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:07:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=12580#comment-19139</guid> <description>Servicemembers deserve their pay. They are better trained and more motivated than most civilians. In addition the nature of the work is quite dangerous. Recruitment is already a difficult buisness. If a freeze on pay was enacted recruitment would become much more expensive and ineffective. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Servicemembers deserve their pay. They are better trained and more motivated than most civilians. In addition the nature of the work is quite dangerous. Recruitment is already a difficult buisness. If a freeze on pay was enacted recruitment would become much more expensive and ineffective.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: William C.</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/26/dod-dodges-budget-bullet/#comment-19130</link> <dc:creator>William C.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 04:23:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=12580#comment-19130</guid> <description>What do you get when you subtract personnel costs from that $700 Billion? A much smaller number although I can&#039;t recall what it is off the top of my head. Personnel costs should be separated in order to better show the amount we are actually spending on new equipment and research. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you get when you subtract personnel costs from that $700 Billion? A much smaller number although I can’t recall what it is off the top of my head. Personnel costs should be separated in order to better show the amount we are actually spending on new equipment and research.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: William C.</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/26/dod-dodges-budget-bullet/#comment-19131</link> <dc:creator>William C.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:25:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=12580#comment-19131</guid> <description>There are indeed many such problems in the industry but there are also many problems on the political end that have to be addressed to. And if we can stomp out all of the corruption and fraud we shouldn&#039;t reduce funding as some automatically want to do. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are indeed many such problems in the industry but there are also many problems on the political end that have to be addressed to. And if we can stomp out all of the corruption and fraud we shouldn’t reduce funding as some automatically want to do.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jason</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/26/dod-dodges-budget-bullet/#comment-19091</link> <dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:19:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=12580#comment-19091</guid> <description>Mustang, you deserve an applause. The DoD is going to have the largest Defense Budget  ever, passing $700 Billion, bigger then Reagan during the Cold War. The problem is, the  damn Europeans expect the Americans to &quot;take care of them&quot;. So, at the same time, their Defense Budget&#039;s stay flat, or even decrease, while the US&#039;s increase. The President should stand up and say, look if we protect your candy***, you damn well better pay for it. Being a world police man is one thing, it&#039;s another thing to bend over to the so-called &quot;allies&quot;. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mustang, you deserve an applause. The DoD is going to have the largest Defense Budget  ever, passing $700 Billion, bigger then Reagan during the Cold War. The problem is, the  damn Europeans expect the Americans to “take care of them”. So, at the same time, their Defense Budget’s stay flat, or even decrease, while the US’s increase. The President should stand up and say, look if we protect your candy***, you damn well better pay for it. Being a world police man is one thing, it’s another thing to bend over to the so-called “allies”.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ruth</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/26/dod-dodges-budget-bullet/#comment-19089</link> <dc:creator>Ruth</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:13:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=12580#comment-19089</guid> <description>What percentage of deferred benefits --or better yet--real-time benefits do government officials recieve and never put their life on the line for this country.  They work part-time, draw hugh paychecks, and have the best medical coverage of all Americans. Have you heard anything about them taking furlough days WITHOUT PAY or getting their benefits cut?  NO you have not and you will not until the working Americans stand up and say Capital Hill needs to sacafice not just the military and everyday citizens.  My husband is retired military and anyone who thinks after spending 26 years in the military you can retire and live the &quot;high life&quot; need to do some research.  You will be lucky if you can pay your rent, utilities and buy groceries on that.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What percentage of deferred benefits –or better yet–real-time benefits do government officials recieve and never put their life on the line for this country.  They work part-time, draw hugh paychecks, and have the best medical coverage of all Americans. Have you heard anything about them taking furlough days WITHOUT PAY or getting their benefits cut?  NO you have not and you will not until the working Americans stand up and say Capital Hill needs to sacafice not just the military and everyday citizens.  My husband is retired military and anyone who thinks after spending 26 years in the military you can retire and live the “high life” need to do some research.  You will be lucky if you can pay your rent, utilities and buy groceries on that.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mustang</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/26/dod-dodges-budget-bullet/#comment-19088</link> <dc:creator>Mustang</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:52:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=12580#comment-19088</guid> <description>I understand the need to provide BMD for Europe.  But why are we not having the Europeans pay the expenses for it?  We could provide the technology and they could pay the expenses for protecting their own countries.  It seems to me that we are giving them a free ride for defense while they are pouring their money into social programs. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand the need to provide BMD for Europe.  But why are we not having the Europeans pay the expenses for it?  We could provide the technology and they could pay the expenses for protecting their own countries.  It seems to me that we are giving them a free ride for defense while they are pouring their money into social programs.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bill R.</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/26/dod-dodges-budget-bullet/#comment-19087</link> <dc:creator>Bill R.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:25:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=12580#comment-19087</guid> <description>We&#039;ve seen this train wreck coming. I&#039;m glad the mugwumps at CBSA think that the revolution has been postponed. This just shows how out of contract with reality those guys are. RDT&amp;E is hosed. Clinton whittled it down, and Rumsfeld had to build his ambitious ventures on the bones of red-blooded programs that were fairly mature. The Gates comes in and does the same kind of thing. Back in the seventies and eighties you could talk intelligibly about squeezing efficiencies out of the system. That made sense then. This is now - you are not cutting out fat any more, you are cutting out muscle and bone. Its the old story of the tortoise and the hare. We be the hare, and eventually our international competitors will catch up. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We’ve seen this train wreck coming. I’m glad the mugwumps at CBSA think that the revolution has been postponed. This just shows how out of contract with reality those guys are. RDT&amp;E is hosed. Clinton whittled it down, and Rumsfeld had to build his ambitious ventures on the bones of red-blooded programs that were fairly mature. The Gates comes in and does the same kind of thing. Back in the seventies and eighties you could talk intelligibly about squeezing efficiencies out of the system. That made sense then. This is now — you are not cutting out fat any more, you are cutting out muscle and bone. Its the old story of the tortoise and the hare. We be the hare, and eventually our international competitors will catch up.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bill</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/26/dod-dodges-budget-bullet/#comment-19082</link> <dc:creator>bill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:14:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=12580#comment-19082</guid> <description>After spending 22 years on active duty and the last 5 as an Army Civilian at the largest weapons manufacturing facility, I can honestly say I could balance the budget in 2 years just cutting blatant outright theft, waste fraud, embezzlement and abuse.  It is mind blowing to see just how much tax payer money is wasted paying relatives of high ranking civilian employees who have no experience, no skills and no knowledge of the high paying jobs they are given.  Nepotism is rampant, contract kickbacks fraud and theft is way out of control.  Unfortunately if you try to do the right thing and help clean it up, you are considered a problem and nuisance.  You can&#039;t tell me high ranking officials and politicians don&#039;t see this!  Of course to curb it, they would have to eliminate nepotism and inheritance of good paying jobs which I don&#039;t see happening! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After spending 22 years on active duty and the last 5 as an Army Civilian at the largest weapons manufacturing facility, I can honestly say I could balance the budget in 2 years just cutting blatant outright theft, waste fraud, embezzlement and abuse.  It is mind blowing to see just how much tax payer money is wasted paying relatives of high ranking civilian employees who have no experience, no skills and no knowledge of the high paying jobs they are given.  Nepotism is rampant, contract kickbacks fraud and theft is way out of control.  Unfortunately if you try to do the right thing and help clean it up, you are considered a problem and nuisance.  You can’t tell me high ranking officials and politicians don’t see this!  Of course to curb it, they would have to eliminate nepotism and inheritance of good paying jobs which I don’t see happening!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gunney one</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/26/dod-dodges-budget-bullet/#comment-19070</link> <dc:creator>Gunney one</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 02:01:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=12580#comment-19070</guid> <description>The Democrat party is the oldest of the 2 party&#039;s.  And also the one that refuses to take the blame for anything that has gone wrong with this country.  Their mantra is &quot;blame it on the Republicans&quot;.  You Liberals claim to be intellectuals.  It seems the more learnin&#039;  you get the more common sense you loose. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Democrat party is the oldest of the 2 party’s.  And also the one that refuses to take the blame for anything that has gone wrong with this country.  Their mantra is “blame it on the Republicans”.  You Liberals claim to be intellectuals.  It seems the more learnin’  you get the more common sense you loose.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DogWasher</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/26/dod-dodges-budget-bullet/#comment-19068</link> <dc:creator>DogWasher</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:31:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=12580#comment-19068</guid> <description>DoD does need trimming, but DoD is one of the few things that is specifically mentioned as a justifyable expense in the U.S. Constitution (the paper document -- not the wooden boat with sails).  The trimming of federal budgets should start at the top -- where the money gets authorized.  Cut funding to congress and everything will get right real fast. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DoD does need trimming, but DoD is one of the few things that is specifically mentioned as a justifyable expense in the U.S. Constitution (the paper document — not the wooden boat with sails).  The trimming of federal budgets should start at the top — where the money gets authorized.  Cut funding to congress and everything will get right real fast.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chantelle</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/26/dod-dodges-budget-bullet/#comment-19065</link> <dc:creator>Chantelle</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:14:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=12580#comment-19065</guid> <description>Boy, you lot have got some real thick heads that have floated to the top of the tank! Basic common sense shows that fat, dumpy pigeon known as the F-35 JSF is going to cost far more than the F-22 Raptor to both develop and to buy, unit cost wise. Yet, you are allowing them brainiacs in the OSD to shut down the making of  something that works on the promise of something that likely won&#039;t, for which you will pay through the nose. Well might you say, &quot;God save America&quot;, &#039;cause someone is going to have to! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boy, you lot have got some real thick heads that have floated to the top of the tank!</p><p>Basic common sense shows that fat, dumpy pigeon known as the F-35 JSF is going to cost far more than the F-22 Raptor to both develop and to buy, unit cost wise.</p><p>Yet, you are allowing them brainiacs in the OSD to shut down the making of  something that works on the promise of something that likely won’t, for which you will pay through the nose.</p><p>Well might you say, “God save America”, ’cause someone is going to have to!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: William C.</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/26/dod-dodges-budget-bullet/#comment-19064</link> <dc:creator>William C.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:49:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=12580#comment-19064</guid> <description>It wouldn&#039;t be a Byron Skinner post without an attack on us &quot;EVIL!!!!&quot; conservatives who are blamed for everything bad in his universe. First the ranting about generic &quot;EVIL!!!&quot; corporations followed by an attack on God? Will he whine about WalMart and &quot;In God we Trust&quot; on the dollar next? You act as if bribery and corruption didn&#039;t occur in congress for the last century. Yet I suppose it is okay when ACLU lawyers and other leftist groups are the benefactors. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wouldn’t be a Byron Skinner post without an attack on us “EVIL!!!!” conservatives who are blamed for everything bad in his universe. First the ranting about generic “EVIL!!!” corporations followed by an attack on God? Will he whine about WalMart and “In God we Trust” on the dollar next?</p><p>You act as if bribery and corruption didn’t occur in congress for the last century. Yet I suppose it is okay when ACLU lawyers and other leftist groups are the benefactors.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Harry</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/26/dod-dodges-budget-bullet/#comment-19055</link> <dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:43:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=12580#comment-19055</guid> <description>They should freeze military pay for a few years to help. GIs already make 2-3 times more than civilians. Want proof, read the blog at G2mil. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should freeze military pay for a few years to help. GIs already make 2–3 times more than civilians. Want proof, read the blog at G2mil.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: William C.</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/26/dod-dodges-budget-bullet/#comment-19063</link> <dc:creator>William C.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:41:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=12580#comment-19063</guid> <description>Harry those serving deserve what they are getting due to the nature of their work. However the way the DoD budget is laid out and organized needs to be changed. Personnel costs should be separated. It is clear to anybody who has looked at the numbers that the budget is personnel driven, the amount given to research, development, and procurement is not nearly as large as the anti-military crowd wants you to believe. By separating this two areas of the budget, perhaps it will be easier for the US Military to get the new equipment and systems it needs for the future. Modernization and results should come first. Not the cost in money that senators would rather use for their bribes and personal deals. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harry those serving deserve what they are getting due to the nature of their work.</p><p>However the way the DoD budget is laid out and organized needs to be changed. Personnel costs should be separated. It is clear to anybody who has looked at the numbers that the budget is personnel driven, the amount given to research, development, and procurement is not nearly as large as the anti-military crowd wants you to believe. By separating this two areas of the budget, perhaps it will be easier for the US Military to get the new equipment and systems it needs for the future.</p><p>Modernization and results should come first. Not the cost in money that senators would rather use for their bribes and personal deals.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Byron Skinner</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/26/dod-dodges-budget-bullet/#comment-19054</link> <dc:creator>Byron Skinner</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:34:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=12580#comment-19054</guid> <description>Good Morning dow,I would suggest you invest more time in reading Constitutional law dow. Property rights are not commutative in the Constitution, but individual.Of course that has not stopped Conservatives from corrupting the Constitution. I guess starting in 1794 and the Fugitive Slave Act that a southern dominated Supreme  Court ratified. Ironically the owner ship of human beings is the first right that the corporation wanted to protect.Since the corporation is mentioned now where in the US Constitution (along with God) it appears that the Corporation has hijacked individual rights and has stolen the Constitution.What the Supreme Court along with the eminent domain ruling of a few years ago smashes any individual property rights as set forth in the Constitution, this campaign finance is nothing more then the legalization of bribery.In short of you or I dow approached a member of Congress with a wad of money and request some special law or his/her support on a vote we would be committing an illegal act, attempted bribing of a member of Congress. If Boeing comes up to that same member and says we (Boeing Corp.) would like to donate to your campaign fund ( which when that member leaves office they can take their campaign funds with them) or and by the way _________. It&#039;s all legal.Can someone explain why?Under this corrupted and bought off court the corporation has the legal right, through a bought off local/state government to take your real property, and now has the right to bribe members of Congress to support useless spending that serves nothing more then corporate profits, in short they are now in your wallet.ALLONS, Byron Skinner</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Morning dow,</p><p>I would suggest you invest more time in reading Constitutional law dow. Property rights are not commutative in the Constitution, but individual.</p><p>Of course that has not stopped Conservatives from corrupting the Constitution. I guess starting in 1794 and the Fugitive Slave Act that a southern dominated Supreme  Court ratified. Ironically the owner ship of human beings is the first right that the corporation wanted to protect.</p><p>Since the corporation is mentioned now where in the US Constitution (along with God) it appears that the Corporation has hijacked individual rights and has stolen the Constitution.</p><p>What the Supreme Court along with the eminent domain ruling of a few years ago smashes any individual property rights as set forth in the Constitution, this campaign finance is nothing more then the legalization of bribery.</p><p>In short of you or I dow approached a member of Congress with a wad of money and request some special law or his/her support on a vote we would be committing an illegal act, attempted bribing of a member of Congress. If Boeing comes up to that same member and says we (Boeing Corp.) would like to donate to your campaign fund ( which when that member leaves office they can take their campaign funds with them) or and by the way _________. It’s all legal.</p><p>Can someone explain why?</p><p>Under this corrupted and bought off court the corporation has the legal right, through a bought off local/state government to take your real property, and now has the right to bribe members of Congress to support useless spending that serves nothing more then corporate profits, in short they are now in your wallet.</p><p>ALLONS,<br /> Byron Skinner</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Byron Skinner</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/26/dod-dodges-budget-bullet/#comment-19053</link> <dc:creator>Byron Skinner</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:21:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=12580#comment-19053</guid> <description>Good Morning dow,I would suggest you invest more time in Constitutional law. Property rights are not commutative in the Constitution but individual.Of course that has not stopped Conservatives from corruption the Constitution I guess starting in 1794 and the Fugitive Slave Act that a southern dominated Supreme  Court ratified. Ironically the owner ship of human beings is the first right that the corporation wanted to protect.Since the corporation is mentioned now where in the US Constitution (along with God) it appears that the Corporation has hijacked individual rights and has stolen the Constitution.What the Supreme Court along with the eminent domain ruling of a few years ago smashes any individual property rights as set forth in the Constitution. This campaign</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Morning dow,</p><p>I would suggest you invest more time in Constitutional law. Property rights are not commutative in the Constitution but individual.</p><p>Of course that has not stopped Conservatives from corruption the Constitution I guess starting in 1794 and the Fugitive Slave Act that a southern dominated Supreme  Court ratified. Ironically the owner ship of human beings is the first right that the corporation wanted to protect.</p><p>Since the corporation is mentioned now where in the US Constitution (along with God) it appears that the Corporation has hijacked individual rights and has stolen the Constitution.</p><p>What the Supreme Court along with the eminent domain ruling of a few years ago smashes any individual property rights as set forth in the Constitution. This campaign</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: BOOMER</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/26/dod-dodges-budget-bullet/#comment-19050</link> <dc:creator>BOOMER</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:21:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=12580#comment-19050</guid> <description>continued: AN ideal from some of the troops in country was why not utilize some of the M1&#039;s set for demil, remove the turrent and fire control systems, put in a HUMVEE type turrent fo a 50 cal or MK19 and use them for convoy leads. already on hand, would be even faster after removing the gun turrents, could carry additional personnel, were already fitted with plate and reactive armour. would have been a cheap and easy fix. But instead they decided to use them for bombing proctice and put billions of dollars worth of taxpayers money into MRAPS which were not battle proven or tested for longevity or in different types of terrain. There is no longer any deployment of common sense by the decision making brass or an open ear for the grunts ideals or wants.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>continued: AN ideal from some of the troops in country was why not utilize some of the M1’s set for demil, remove the turrent and fire control systems, put in a HUMVEE type turrent fo a 50 cal or MK19 and use them for convoy leads. already on hand, would be even faster after removing the gun turrents, could carry additional personnel, were already fitted with plate and reactive armour. would have been a cheap and easy fix. But instead they decided to use them for bombing proctice and put billions of dollars worth of taxpayers money into MRAPS which were not battle proven or tested for longevity or in different types of terrain. There is no longer any deployment of common sense by the decision making brass or an open ear for the grunts ideals or wants.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: BOOMER</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/26/dod-dodges-budget-bullet/#comment-19048</link> <dc:creator>BOOMER</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:06:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=12580#comment-19048</guid> <description>OVER UTILIZING CONTRACTORS HAS GOTTEN OUT OF CONTROL. Look at this up armour Humvee and MRAP abortion, We (AMERICAN MILITARY) faced the same issue during NAM with IED&#039;s and RPG attacks against convoys. They didnt send out a flash report for new equipment to be developed and sent incountry. The guys on the ground took control and developed the MA DUCE (not the M2B 50 cal) they added plate steel to 2 1/2 ton trucks and mounted 50 cal&#039;s on them to counter the threat and they were fairly effective to be so crude. and they only cost a couple thousand to convert rather than millions. The half tracks of WW2 (still used by Isreal for the same reasons) is another example of what could have been done.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OVER UTILIZING CONTRACTORS HAS GOTTEN OUT OF CONTROL. Look at this up armour Humvee and MRAP abortion, We (AMERICAN MILITARY) faced the same issue during NAM with IED’s and RPG attacks against convoys. They didnt send out a flash report for new equipment to be developed and sent incountry. The guys on the ground took control and developed the MA DUCE (not the M2B 50 cal) they added plate steel to 2 1/2 ton trucks and mounted 50 cal’s on them to counter the threat and they were fairly effective to be so crude. and they only cost a couple thousand to convert rather than millions. The half tracks of WW2 (still used by Isreal for the same reasons) is another example of what could have been done.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: pennst98</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/26/dod-dodges-budget-bullet/#comment-19047</link> <dc:creator>pennst98</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:54:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=12580#comment-19047</guid> <description>Point 1: So what, we outsource everything but the infantry? Think through this logic, this is the stupidity that destroyed intelligence. &quot;The private sector can handle this...&quot; and BLAM! We emptied the best minds overnight, lost control of the information, and now pay 10x what it used to cost for 1/3 of the output. Point 2: Once the vehicles and equipment are handled by &quot;the professionals&quot; the services increasingly become ignorant to how / if their equipment works, and more importantly what is a reasonable cost. Pretty soon you&#039;re being told that oil filters cost $150 dollars a pop because their &quot;custom&quot; and we experiencing program delays because the flux capacitor didn&#039;t reach 21.1 Gigawatts at 55mph. Point 3: Point 2 is already happening. Why design our own equipment, the contractors will handle that? Why manage that program when there is a consulting company to do that? Pretty soon no one knows what&#8217;s going on, you can only get service for 2 hours on a Tuesday, and the service support contractors cost more than the battalion they support&#8230;&#8230;. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Point 1: So what, we outsource everything but the infantry? Think through this logic, this is the stupidity that destroyed intelligence. “The private sector can handle this…” and BLAM! We emptied the best minds overnight, lost control of the information, and now pay 10x what it used to cost for 1/3 of the output.<br /> Point 2: Once the vehicles and equipment are handled by “the professionals” the services increasingly become ignorant to how / if their equipment works, and more importantly what is a reasonable cost. Pretty soon you’re being told that oil filters cost $150 dollars a pop because their “custom” and we experiencing program delays because the flux capacitor didn’t reach 21.1 Gigawatts at 55mph.</p><p>Point 3: Point 2 is already happening. Why design our own equipment, the contractors will handle that? Why manage that program when there is a consulting company to do that? Pretty soon no one knows what’s going on, you can only get service for 2 hours on a Tuesday, and the service support contractors cost more than the battalion they support…….</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Olaf Brescia</title><link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/01/26/dod-dodges-budget-bullet/#comment-19039</link> <dc:creator>Olaf Brescia</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:45:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dodbuzz.com/?p=12580#comment-19039</guid> <description>The DoD may have indeed dodged a bullet. The question is have we bought the &#8216;correct&#8217; bullets? Multi-sensor combat aircraft should not be dismissed. What if they don&#039;t fly where they&#039;re supposed to? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The DoD may have indeed dodged a bullet. The question is have we bought the ‘correct’ bullets? Multi-sensor combat aircraft should not be dismissed. What if they don’t fly where they’re supposed to?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.006 seconds using apc
Object Caching 816/817 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.dodbuzz.com

Served from: dodbuzz.com @ 2012-02-09 06:38:14 -->
