A “Year of Continuous Challenge”

A “Year of Continuous Challenge”

Jim Jones, president Obama’s national security advisor, didn’t break any big news today at the Center for Strategic and International Study. But he did highlight that this year will be tough and he offered some of the reasons why, like Iran.

His comments on Iran came closest to news, when he said that Iran, facing increased pressure from the international community over its apparent pursuit of nuclear weapons might well strike out at Israel as a result.

His reasoning was simple: a “pressured country often lashes out through its surrogates,” he said. That may mean “heightened risk” of attacks against Israel or more violence on the West Bank.


The Iranian threat clearly arose from a more general trend that Jones identified, the “intransigence” of some international actors that “continue to pose great threats to our national security.”

Jones laid out some of the guiding principles of the Obama administration’s national security approach, the most prominent of which was the president’s desire to “usher in a new order of engagement.”

Jones told the CSIS gathering that he knew “there’s been a lot of debate and some confusion about what the term engagement means.” And then he answered his own question. saying that the administration’s “strategic vision” is to approach the world in “an open and transparent way” instead of “focusing solely on threats that endanger us” they also focus on values and goals we share around the world. Proof of the new approach: the long and deep consultations that lead to the Afghanistan strategy decision, and our aid to Haiti. Haiti demonstrates, he said, that the “U.S. is a partner that can be counted on in good times and bad times.”

However, “engagement is not end in itself” and the president “is determined that we shape the future and not be swept away by it.” For those who might see engagement as a softening of the U.S. approach to Al Qaeda and other terrorist groups, Jones noted that the Obama administration has killed “far more” terrorist leaders than in the previous year.

He may not have intended it this way, but Jones offered a good example of how engagement might yield dividends when he was asked what weapons the U.S. might be ready to sell to Taiwan.” What we announce or don’t announce will not come as a surprise to our Chinese friends,” he said. Why would the U.S. make certain to inform China of its intent to sell weapons to Taiwan? “We are bent on a new relationship with China as a rising power in the world,” Jones said.

He didn’t offer much of an assessment of the Obama administration’s first year, though he called it one of “progress.” The future? The “year ahead will be one of continuous challenge,” he promised.

Share |

Join the Conversation

“What we announce or don’t announce will not come as a surprise to our Chinese friends”

Of course. The U.S. is in debt to the Chicoms big time to the trillions. Want to sell arms to Taiwan? Better get it cleared with the communists. Meet with the Dalai Lama? Ditto. I forget. Are we allowed to pay back the communists using clunkers?

barry has a multiple of Mao followers in the Admin and barry himself was raised by a Communist, Barry obama and the Chicomms are fellow travelers. OF course they are “friends”

Pray for Taiwan.….

Too bad we just gave Taiwan alot of new military hardware, with the cost of cutting ties with China… again… (just like Bush did).

That military hardware we sell Taiwan however, despite the small numbers could be quite a deterrent if such an idea were to enter the PRC’s head. Those 30 Block III AH-64D Apaches for example could do quite some damage to any armored unit the Chinese could land.

Thunder350 selling that latest batch of equipment to Taiwan may have offended the Chinese somewhat, but they aren’t going to cut trade with us or anything drastic.

I was replying to DOW with his “Obama loves China, hates Taiwan” speech.

I support giving Taiwan military help. Tho would also like a closer partnership with China. :)

Good Morning Folks,

Although I have a great deal of respect for General Jones, on the issue of Taiwan he is flat out wrong. It make no sense to poke a stick at China over something that we the United States have almost zero strategic interest in. The arms deal has escalated in a couple of weeks from $1.6 to now $6 billion.

There is a strong indication here is that President Obama has take personal affront to the way the Chinese greeted him on his recent trip. Now he is upping the arms race with Taiwan and kissing up to the Dali Lama and getting involved in Tibet.
This is needless posturing on President Obamas part. The last thing the US needs is to get involved in a “Cold War” with China or a “Hot War” in South East Asia, again.

This is not the way a President of the United States Acts, but the 9mm behavior of some body who can’t get the code of the Streets of Chicago out of his psychic.

ALLONS,
Byron Skinner

It’s amusing how the US tries to pressure Russia and others about arms sales to nations the US opposes, and does this business w/ Taiwan against China’s interests.

Guess they figure it’s worth the cost of whatever is at stake.

I don’t think this’ll help persuade China to pressure DPRK or Iran to the extent that it can, in the interests of ratcheting down hostility towards their neighbors or the west.

Of course, I’m in favor of the US guaranteeing defense of Taiwan, Israel and everyone else because it’s in the constitution. Unlike providing education, health and general well being of it’s own citizens.

Regarding the President’s supposedly hostile actions towards China it is simply minor political bickering. We have swapped between selling Taiwan advanced equipment and not supplying them with any modern designs for decades now. This just appears to be a time of sales to Taiwan, China has seen this enough to know it is not some sort of plot. Taiwan isn’t in any sort of position to even threaten the PRC from a military standpoint.

I see no reason why we should deny this multi-billion $ deal which will undoubtedly keep many defense workers in the US from losing their jobs among other things.

Good Evening Folks,

Its amusing to see the responses to this post. Why any rational person would do a lousy $6 billion arms deal to a corrupt government that we don’t even officially recognize is beyond comprehension.

The economic damage China could do to the US in one month would make that $6 billion look like chump change. In November China fired a shot over the US’s bow when it liquidated $10 billion in treasury bill, it seems that no one was home when the message was delivered.

The US economy is supported 70% by retail sales. Is the game the wingers playing here is how many days the US economy if China turned off credit to major importers like Wal-Mart?

All President Obama and those peculiar institutions of winger tanks is doing here is daring the Chinese to do something. It’s the Chinese here that is acting like adults, not the United States.

If this reckless behavior by the United States continues it won’t be a question of if, but when and what. China in a real short period of time could do enough damage to the US economy that it would be a decade or longer in recovering.

On the Chinese part, hey they have know hard times for the last 3,500 years. This is called combat, and if any of you had read any history at all you will know that the Chinese are very, very good at strangling another culture. They won’t have to fire a shot.

ALLONS,
Byron Skinner

All I can say to your post is LOL. China damage the US economically? OMG whatever drugs your taking I WANT THEM!

It is the US that can destroy China by cutting trade. China basically exports EVERYTHING to us. They NEED us. They wouldn’t know what to do if they couldn’t export their cheap, child labored, poisoned, led contaminated products to us anymore. Also I swear Japan (yea that tiny Island). Was destroying mighty China 60+ years ago until we stopped exporting oil to them. Which everyone knows followed Pearl harbor, and us entering WWII.

Only thing is, China sees Taiwan as their territory, (as it was their territory until their civil war). We would be upset aswell if Alaska rebelled, and China supplied them with military equipment. Or like during our civil war when foreign nations helped the confederate states. :)

@Byron Skinner — You make an excellent argument as to why we need to deep 6 this debt culture we have in Washington and pay our way. As the good book says, the borrower is slave to the lender. Maybe if we got from underneath our boot we could support the ROC without fear of PRC retaliations.

But of course, the billions going to Taiwan are small compared to the projected $40 billion plus that US foreign military sales are going to pour into the Middle East. Because there’s no business like US arms business… makes those difficult policy discussions just go away.

Humm, let’s think about that.
(1) Use Taiwan arms sales to drive the Chinese to retaliate with economic sanctions against the U.S.
(2) Use that sanction to re-envigorate the U.S. economy by making more stuff here at home (textiles, toys, electronics, etc.)
(3) Create 5 million new jobs in the U.S.
I like it!

It’s all a sham, we could do more to hurt China than they can us. All they have on us is worthless paper becuase no way in He** will Americans stand by and watch china take control of US territory becuase of an agreement congress made with them. On the other hand we can stop importing food — resources — and jobs to china and cause rioting in the streets, we could also cut off grain and food supplies to russia and a host of other countries including wealthy middle east ones we currently supply. Oil is nice but you cant eat it. The middle east will opose iran on its own just as it did iraq when they launched skuds against Isreal and the Isrealies let it be know they were going defcon. Egypt Omahn and the others jumped on the US band wagon to prevent an Isreali strike. I have no issue selling outdated equipment to other countries — as long as it is really outdated and we no longer use it but I’d prefer it not happen at all, It was really disheartening fighting enemy equiped with our gear and ammo from previous foreing sales and black markets. But I agree it will be a trying year because the world has seen a leader in doubt and a congress that cant coinside in the interest of the country.

*required

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement